Says the person whose loyalty is only to Putin. Got it. I was not commenting on the OP. I did that in an earlier post and was quite consistent between that post and the one you commented on.
The infanticide of 1 Samuel 15. The mass murder of the global flood. God telling Israelites to take little virgin girls as their property after war. Pretty much all of Song of Solomon (though that's consensual sex at least).
Ah, you are under the impression that the only that matters are four letter words and not the actual content. We will just have to disagree about that. I'd rather my niece say the word "****" than actually promote slaughtering other children. But you do you.
You shifted the goalposts so that infanticide is okay but only four letter words are bad. I don't follow your philosophy there. But you do you.
LOL, you and Putin have the same goals, the same arguments, the same philosophy. But then again, you get the US Constitution wrong each and every time. You don't read what anything says. Your read what you want to interpret as to meet your political objective. This has been the case with Ukraine, Immigration, and pretty much every other topic on this forum.
You're not going to understand the irony of your post, particularly considering your blatant lies in the Birthright citizenship thread, but plenty of people will.
No blantant lies. It is well established Constituitonal Law and under the US Code no matter how you slice it. You disagree, but you are not in charge, are you?
No it isn't. There is no connection between the Chinese Exclusion Act and the Kim Wong Ark case. There isn't any history, constitutionally or otherwise, that links them.
exactly, I guess some do not feel their child is safe in the church any more so want their child to learn about God at school vs Sunday school now I am not even Christian and I bought each of my children a nice zippered bible when they were little - one is Christian today, the other is not, they chose for themselves, if the parents were too poor to buy a bible, sure the church would give them one for free
Can you identify what part of the book “And Tango Makes Three” couldn’t be read aloud? So you wouldn’t have an issue with book’s discussion on the seminal emissions or size of animals genitals? On the air? Maybe during a child’s tv program?
The Chinee Exclusion Act was the backdrop of the Ark Case. That's why there is a connection. Again, why would the immigration office of the USA prior to the case want Ark to acknowledge that he was not a US citizen to begin with? They were citing that very same law, among others. From this link, "The acts of Congress known as the Chinese Exclusion Acts, the earliest of which was passed some fourteen years after the adoption of the Constitutional Amendment, cannot control its meaning or impair its effect, but must be construed and executed in subordination to its provisions. And the right of the United States, as exercised by and under those acts, to exclude or to expel from the country persons of the Chinese race born in China and continuing to be subjects of the Emperor of China, though having acquired a commercial domicil in the United States, has been upheld by this court for reasons applicable to all aliens alike, and inapplicable to citizens of whatever race or color."
This is obviously sexually explicit. Care to explain why children need to read this in school libraries?
Try teaching (no puns intended) the others Christians that who are trying to force biblical teachings and prayers back into schools by law.
Ezekiel 23:20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.
Reminds me of the idea that Satanism is very inclusive. Satan doesn't mind if you're straight white male or a purple person part of the LGBQ+ rainbow. Everybody is welcome in hell. So eat your heart out mister pope.