Thirteen-year-old girl is forced to give birth under Mississippi abortion ban

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by omni, Aug 14, 2023.

  1. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where the HELL did you get that crazy idea?

    Republicans have worked nonstop for increasingly draconian abortion law.

    The very idea that they would stop at 20 weeks is literally ridiculous. They haven't stopped at ANYTHING.
     
  2. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,249
    Likes Received:
    33,214
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because it doesn’t provide any protection for individuals seeking an abortion prior to 20 weeks in areas where it has been banned.

    Why should democrats agree to nationwide restrictions on abortions if republicans will not agree to nationwide exceptions on abortions prior to 20 weeks?
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  3. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Late term abortions are rare and limited almost entirely to cases where there are serious problems - either with the woman or with the fetus.

    The problem with this law is that it leaves healthcare judgement to PROSECUTORS, not the woman and her doctor.

    We're not having some sort of pandemic of women carrying fetuses nearly to birth and then getting abortions without medical justification.

    You just don't have evidence of a problem that government must solve.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  4. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    32,009
    Likes Received:
    21,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    more likely upset about the demise of two woke mopes who are less likely to vote for Biden in 2024
     
    mngam likes this.
  5. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    32,009
    Likes Received:
    21,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    none of that ever objectively harmed you and much of it was drummed up after the 2020 election.
     
  6. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    32,009
    Likes Received:
    21,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    many people don't consider abortion "health care" but the fact is-the law allows abortion in the case of rape.
     
  7. Par10

    Par10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Messages:
    4,393
    Likes Received:
    3,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you are saying that the dems would rather just have the states super restrictive laws rather than the nationwide reasonable law and then work together to fix the little problems? I don't think so. They didn't want to get rid of the argument so that they could still run on the platform of the evil republicans and get donors to fund their campaigns.
     
  8. Par10

    Par10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Messages:
    4,393
    Likes Received:
    3,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Are you suggesting that you don't have the ability to look it up?
     
  9. Par10

    Par10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Messages:
    4,393
    Likes Received:
    3,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    BS, it leaves everything up to the woman and her doctor until 20 weeks and then up to the doctor to provide evidence that it is necessary for the health of the woman. Anyway, if it is rare and so limited like you say, it wouldn't have been a problem.
     
  10. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The reason that is BS is that it's been shown that it isn't actually available.

    The OP case is an example. The parents and the girl in the OP case wanted an abortion.

    They were denied.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  11. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You didn't counter anything I said.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  12. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,677
    Likes Received:
    17,543
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    My personal and anecdotal consequence/evidence is irrelevant to and has no bearing on Trump's four indictments of almost 90 felony counts.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  13. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,677
    Likes Received:
    17,543
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Public opinion has no import in medical technology, medicine, and medical practice. Abortion is a medical procedure and falls under the purview of health care.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2023
    Bowerbird and WillReadmore like this.
  14. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,155
    Likes Received:
    10,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right.

    But it is explicitly the limitation on the power and control of the federal government.
     
  15. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,249
    Likes Received:
    33,214
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    To my knowledge the bill proposed wouldn’t have gotten rid of the super restrictive provisions in red states it would have only banned abortion beyond 20 weeks in all states.

    Are you saying this bill would have forced republican states to allow all abortions prior to 20 weeks?
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  16. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,192
    Likes Received:
    37,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anything a state can’t take away isn’t a right.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  17. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You better make that more clear.

    Are you seriously unaware of the Republican changes to law since the Roe ruling?

    Do you think that the Republican efforts to make abortion more impossible to get didn't begin long before that recent ruling?

    Are you aware that the majority of Americans are NOT in favor of these laws against abortion?
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  18. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,155
    Likes Received:
    10,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wait.

    What?

    What does that double negative have to do with my point?
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2023
  19. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not that explicit. There are limitations to the rights listed. There are rights implied by the rights listed.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  20. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,155
    Likes Received:
    10,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The 10th amendment is pretty straight forward.
     
  21. omni

    omni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2021
    Messages:
    6,297
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The 20 week rule doesn't mean anything. It just says no abortions after 20 weeks. It doesn't stop states from enacting a 6 week ban.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  22. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are dodging the clear facts of the OP case.

    Why was the rape victim in the OP refused an abortion?

    She and her parents WANTED an abortion. She was raped.

    YOU say an abortion was available. Mississippi said NO.
     
    mdrobster and Bowerbird like this.
  23. omni

    omni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2021
    Messages:
    6,297
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. That the bill said no abortions after 20 weeks. It did not say abortions up to 20 weeks. A state would still be allowed to enact stricter laws. Republicans crafted it to trick people, but dems didn't fall for it.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2023
    Bowerbird and WillReadmore like this.
  24. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are reasons for abortions after 20 weeks.

    The 20 week rule means it is up to prosecutors and legislators whether doctors can address healthcare issues.

    Since doctors can not come anywhere close to treatments that could lose them their careers in medicine, the healthcare damage is FAR larger that the law says, as healthcare issues always come in terms of measures of health risk that can be challenged.

    Doctors have to deny care if it comes within a country mile of putting their licenses at risk.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2023
    Bowerbird likes this.
  25. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,491
    Likes Received:
    16,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's obvious, but also not the point.
     

Share This Page