Indeed I would be. He didn't specify any particular concern, so there is nothing to share. Lot of people complain for the sake of complaining. In this case he said he doesn't care how ignorant people vote, so what's there to share?
v Should require some form of sanction when laws are enacted that deliberately If you lived or traveled outside of a settlement in early America a firearm and a knife were essential pieces of kit for everyone.
Sure, but the situation was what it was. If you didn't join the militia, you'd have to fight the bears and pumas with just the knife (unless they grabbed that too).
No one is asking the voters opinion. The sitting politicians in the States decided, and in most States the decision was hurried through before voters had a chance to vote for their representatives based on their stance on that issue. But that's fine by me, because I agree its a State issue. Trump flipped from pro-life to-proabortion, and I wonder if that wins him more votes than it loses.
In most states it's a losing issue for the GOP. It's gonna be why KY-a red state-retains a democrat governor. The GOP contender is an extremist on abortion
NO...our Governor has declared us a "Sanctuary State for the 2d Amendment"... local law enforcement won't enforce such unconstitutional efforts... and gun regulation has been pretty much given to the states by the Supreme Court anyway.
ATF won;t get far without local LEO help... info... enforcement,,, et al It's a mirror image of blue state "illegal immigrant sanctuary":... it worked for them to the tune of millions of illegals in country now
Just making s**t up, eh? For what objective? Since you are fabricating history tell us how Washington, an advocate for gun control, was on track to be king, until derailed by civil rights advocates who exposed his ownership of slaves.