Why are Pro-White advocates always smeared?

Because antifa rules.

 

Polar Bear I thought the op brought out some legit stuff but now it is antisemitism? Is it about the uneven playing field or do you hate Jews?

 

Yep, there are cockroaches EVERYWHERE, but why are you PROUD of it?

 

To respond to the original post-

What I said:

Because Pro-White advocates are inevitably bitter white bigots who are trying to make a case for why their version of who is white is superior to everyone else.

But as long as your 'pro-xxxx' position doesn't include attacks on other people simply because of their race, religion or creed, I don't really care. But as I have said- and what always comes out is that these posts are by bitter white bigots who just can't stand that America includes those who aren't their definition of 'white'.

Your response

Of course my response is a rant. A rant against bigots, pretending all they care about is setting up a social club where they can discuss the achievements of Steve Jobs and Benjamin Franklin.

If you want to set up an foundation for the advancement of poor whites in black areas I am fine with that. I will point out that there are tons of foundations that do that already with different sounding names- "Sons of Latvia", "Sons of Slovenia", "Daughters of the Revolution" etc- there are tons of foundations and scholarships focused on people who came from European heritages.

So yes- stop focusing on race and agree that we are all human.

I have nothing against anyone wanting to express pride in their forefathers, just so long as its intention isn't really just to express their bigotry towards others race, religion or creed.

 

So what? Why is that even relevant even if true? How does it change anything I just said?

No one except you people gives a crap about Jews. You are the only ones who buy into your retarded conspiracy theory. Have you considered the possibility that not everyone is as weak willed as you seem to think white people are?

No it doesnt. Affirmative action discriminates between minorities. There are lots of instances where you can get benefits from being black or native american that you would not get being South American or East Indian.

The victors write the history. That is as it should be. nations that embraced your ideology are now included under those FORMER empires. Nature does not recognize excuses.

And racists have never been known to kill millions of people? Is that your logic? LOL

I never made a claim as to which is more dangerous, just which is more despised in the US. Please pay attention.

I agree that racism, as an ideology, is weaker than communism. And that communism was therefore more dangerous.

In a nation of 300 million people...and you exaggerate this to make it sound commonplace.

Propaganda may have worked in Hitler's society, but in America, not so much.

 

I'm not quite sure what this means. What, exactly, in terms of policy, do you have in mind?

(Note: I will readily admit that I frequent large retailers whenever it is my family's best interest to do so--for instance, the very same brand, type, and size of ice cream that is $5.99 at Kroger costs only $3.97 at Walmart--but that is just sensible, in my opinion. I have no special affection for Big Business, and therefore do not support policies favorable to it, out of some deep, visceral love for it that is simply not in keeping with my actual feelings.)

 

Although I have an exceedingly low regard for Hitler, my feelings for Stalin, Mao, Che Guevara and Pol Pot are no warmer and fuzzier.

All of these folks were quite willing--actually, quite happy--to sacrifice millions, in the name of their respective ideologies.

 

Yet isn't it funny how Hitler's ideology and all of its variations are the only ones that are universally banned? In fact, in some European countries you will be imprisoned for publicly supporting National Socialism and its various offshoot ideologies. Certain right-leaning political parties are also banned, just like in some godforsaken banana republic!!!

Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, Mao, Che and all of the leftist butchers of the 20th Century have gotten off scott free!!!

Go to college wearing a [Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, Mao, Che] T-shirt and you will be applauded. Hell, someone may even offer you a joint.

Go to college wearing a T-shirt with Hitler or a swastika and you will be expelled immediately!!! Your life will be ruined!!! Your family will have to endure endless humiliation!!!

.

 

"Preserve HER"?

What, blonde blue-eyed women can't take care of themselves? These "fragile beauties" can't decide what they would like to do with themselves, and if there are swarthy men around, they may "stray" from the "White Path"?

Maybe that is the REAL problem for White Pride MEN is that they fantasize these white, "perfect" women are conceivable attracted to dark men, so male "white pride" demands their women be segregated away from the "bad influences" that may spark her lusts for "the DARK SIDE"?

What paranoid paternalistic rot! If that is "White Pride", "White Pride" whites are really sorry men and human beings!

 

Steve Jobs is Arab!! But otherwise I agree with much of your post. Racists are among the lowest forms of humanity. The one clarification I would make, is that I don't think pride in forefathers is ok. The only way it is ok, is if the same people similarly feel shame for the crimes of their forefathers. If people want to be proud because some white guys they never met, nor could ever meet wrote the constitution, they similarly need to feel guilt that some white guys they never met massacred native Americans, interred Japanese citizens, fire bombed Tokyo, committed the Holocaust(if they are German), etc. They need to take responsibility for imperialism, racism, transatlantic slavery, and the list goes on and on and on. If they only want to take credit for the good, while ignoring the bad, it is intellectually disingenuous and it leads to the sort of behavior they need to be sorry for, to happen again. Instead they should learn some things, have some accomplishments of their own, and then they will stop needing to piggy back on the accomplishments of some people who happen to share a similar level of melanin.

 

I wanna race mix. The browner the berry the sweeter the juice.

Leftists want to species mix. That doesn't work for me.

 

You are so funny sometimes Albert.

I am fine with horses breeding with donkeys- what do you have against mules Albert? Mule bigotry is rampant on these boards.

 

*Gasp*

No, no, no, perfect young blonde nice christian girls would never do that!

It's only by those non-white animals raping these poor defenseless women that they will breed us out.

(and other such ridiculous rants)

 

Women are in general more idealistic and have been throughout history. It has always been a masculine duty to preserve the eugenics of the herd; this is basic cave man survival stuff. Unsurprisingly, the most successful groups in history have also been masters of "preserving their herd". Ashkenazi Jews, indo-Europeans, Han Chinese, high caste Indians and Arabs, among other groups, have wielded disproportionate power by "smart breeding" and excluding certain groups from their populations.

It is also a historical fact that pretty European girls were always the most prized possessions within the royal harems of the Mongol, Berber and Ottoman kingdoms. Red and blonde hair and blue and green eyes were considered the most attractive and exotic physical features in a woman, just as they are now.

 

Actually lots of prominent left wingers are critical of organized Jewry with regards to the Jews' "oppression" of Arabs as well as their leading role in the banking and foreign war industries. Liberal Jew authors like Joe Klein (Time) and Paul Krugman (New York Times) are both virulent critics of Israel and organized Jewry in general.

Why not scrap them all? They are all blatant forms of anti-white racism and discrimination? If all quotas and affirmative action policies ended tomorrow, I would go silent.

That lets other prominent abusers of human rights off the hook. I will never waver from my anti-communist stance.

"Racists"? Who gets to decide who is "racist"? That is a loose terminology that could apply to dozens of ethnic and/or racial conflicts throughout the world, most of which do not involve "evil" Europeans.

 

Mmmm, so protecting this "white beauty" from the mud men AND her own lustful urges for "animalistic dark men" is the duty of the "white MAN"! and a GOOD reason to lynch any of those darkies that get out of line to whistle at YOUR ivory-white "property"!

This ridiculousness is simply trying to fantasize history! The HUNs were the most successful EMPIRE in history, and they DELIBERATELY mixed their genes with anyone they conquered that they admired to breed a stronger race.

Frankly, this ios a ratehr ego-centrui view, true sometimes and not true other times.

But you will take it on yourself to save them from the CURRENT "Mongols", right?

But you REALLY know in your heart that she TRULY prefers DARK men, don't you? SAVAGE men! Men who will TAKE her against their savage breast! And you must PROTECT her from her weakness! From the threat of her desire to mate with the primitive, in order to protect the purity of your SUPERIOR "white eugenics", right?

 

No one in America except white racists views that through a religious lens. It is kind of ironic that you whine about the supposed Jew conspiracy while citing two sources in your own post that completely undermine your own claim LOL.

Because most Americans (even most white Americans) think they deserve compensation because of the disadvantages they endure (real or imagined) due to how they or their ancestors were treated. Basically...because we feel like it. We need no reason other than that.

That is how democracy works. The majority gets to decide. If you want it to change, you will need to convince the majority of your point of view.

I doubt you would have a problem with it if positions were reversed. Lets not be hypocritical.

I dont believe that for a second. Complaining about how unfair everything is seems to be one thing white racists really are superior at.

Then you can thank Hitler for ruining it for you LOL.

The dictionary. duh.

If you make distinctions between people based on race, you are a racist. If it is what you really believe, why not just embrace the term?

Maybe, but in America it usually means white people, because the vast majority of racists here are white.

Not anymore. We exterminated or assimilated most of those.

 

There is no group in human history that has been more successful than the Untied States of America. We dwarf every civilization that has existed before us. And we are the most diverse nation in human history.

Apparently preserving the herd's eugenics was not the right way to achieve that eh? Otherwise Europe or China would be ahead of us by now. Racial loyalty is a trait common among the lower cultures. But as Americans, such distinctions are beneath us.

 

Keep in mind, the very concept of "whiteness" is a fairly recent one. The United States took all of the various European ethnicities and groups and turned them into one group of people. Meanwhile in Europe, the French, Germans, British, Danish, Italians, Spaniards, Poles, etc. all still distrust and even hate each other.

This is why pro-white advocacy is smeared. Its a dumb racial fantasy, mixed with silly notions of white victimization at the hands of minority groups. Sure there's pro-black advocacy, but most people understand that that's a reaction to centuries of racism from the dominant group. Most people have no clue as to why pro-white advocacy is even needed. Whites own most of the businesses, whites control the standards of beauty, whites control the majority of the wealth, whites make up the majority of the media, whites make up the majority of the political elite. What exactly is the pro-white advocacy for? To dominate the country even more than they already do?

 

What a load of BS. White guys are some of the biggest race mixers around. When Columbus landed in America, the first thing the sailors did was bang Indian women. When the Europeans brought black slaves from Africa, they were banging the black women. When U.S. troops defeated Japan in WW2, they were banging Asian women. White men have no interests in protecting the herd. They're only interested in getting their rocks off just like every other man on the planet.

White supremacists are basically white men who can't get any. So they get upset when they see a white woman with a non-white guy. However, they never get angry at the white man with the Asian or brown woman. That's mainly because the entire white pride movement is really a front for white male losers to control white women, while they still enjoy the pleasures of non-white women.

Yet another reason why pro-white advocates are smeared.

 

Do you have to capitalize everything in your childish rant in order to make a point? It didn't work.

Do you make this stuff up? Actually the Han Chinese built a 3,000 mile wall between themselves and Mongolia to prevent "multiculturalism" and "mixing", and to separate their culture from that of the restless nomads to the north.

More unintelligible ranting...

 

This is when I ignore you.

 

Oh my! You've discovered Patriarchalism and think it's unique to white American males. Evolution hardwired almost all men to think this way because such thinking is useful to the survival of genes. Genes want to survive. Are you aware that the most common genes on earth belong to the line founded by a Mongol named Genghis Khan?

I resent seeing any woman walking down the street with any man except me. That's because my genes demand survival. Hahahaha.

 

The most important facet of white advocacy, white nationalism, etc. does not revolve around the conditions white populations at present, but rather what their situation will be around the corner in the coming decades when they are slated to become minorities in their own countries. No "people" in human history have ever welcomed, much less cheered about becoming minorities in their own countries, for it indicates a loss of political power and is tantamount to committing suicide.

Spaniards and Portuguese, both Romance cultures, behaved much differently in the New World than did the Anglo settlers of New England. They never intended to establish a new Utopian civilization, rather, their gold mines and other ventures were intended to increase their personal wealth back home, where they were to eventually return. Basically it was a get rich quick scheme, and they did rape hundred of thousands of Indians.

Anglo settlers, in an attempt to foster civilization, never invited other cultures to join them and they did not welcome diversity or bring on multiculturalism by interbreeding with Indians or Africans. If you look at the strict rigidity to which Anglo society in North America functioned throughout much of the 19th Century, you will realize why Anglo countries like Canada, Australia, and America have been successes while race-mixing melting pots like Brazil and Mexico are considered Third World.

I didn't think you would stoop to this level. You're just like the other guy who blew his lid.

 

You are 100% correct.

Whatever is in the water these days is causing lots of white males not to care about their genes anymore, and I'm sure those "competing tribes" are ecstatic about the suicidal viewpoint most Europeans hold with regards to their race, ancestry, heritage, etc.