Why are Pro-White advocates always smeared?

Any time, God forbid, anyone in the media or academia mention "white interests" or "European heritage" in a positive light, they are castigated as 15th century heretics or 1984 Thought Criminals and derided as despicable "racists".

Yet when Mestizo advocacy groups like the "Brown Berets" or black rights groups congregate on campuses or march in the street they are portrayed as humanitarians and civil rights advocates... Given that whites are now minorities in most large US cities, why is it ILLEGAL for whites to gave GROUP INTERESTS?


RACISM



MEDIA APPROVED PRIDE

 

Because half the time someone organises a white pride march they do so with swastikas, pictures of Hitler, walking around giving the Nazi salute, etc.

 

One sentence summed it up perfectly.

 

Yet when college leftists publicly worship Lenin and Marx no such negative imagery is implied, even though Communism killed at least 10-20 times more civilians than National Socialism.

 

Lenin and Marx represent political ideologies. Swastikas are interpreted as genocidal white supremacy.

 

What??? Are you forgetting about the "genocidal" gulags that killed 10+ million Russians in the name of ideological supremacy?

 

Everytime I hear the words 'White Pride' I automatically think 'racist'. I don't think I'm the only one.

 

I think my post was quite clear.

Lenin and Marx represent political ideologies. Swastikas are interpreted as genocidal white supremacy.

 

Well, Swastikas also indicate fascism, which is a political ideology.

 

Any time I here 'god forbid', I automatically put my muslim hat on.

But I realy have no opinion on this other than in the USA the white jeuwish who control the entertainment industry and broadcast media, show a manipulated view of reality. What we get fed on the TV is often to objectify women and worship white people. Minorities have always been demonized by the media. but I see this trend diminishing due to the general market being hispanic in the future. Hence, the competition for the latin viewer between jeuwish owned US media industry and the latin private media broadcastors.

If a forgen person comes to the USA for the first time they will be shocked to see the population is not majority of white as they show on media.

But with my white hat on, I must say that in the USA the white is not smeared, nor does it have brown stains on the under pants. They may want to have more color on ther bodies, but they go to tanning booths and the beach for that. At the same time black people try to make their skin more white. Only the brown or "people of color" have no problems with their skin, and most accept themselves as they are.

 

Congratulations, you exhibit as much free thought as a Pavlovian dog...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning#Pavlov.27s_experiment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

 

They also represent the Nazi party, who, while in control in Germany, murdered millions out of their perceived supremacy.

 

Yes. I am fully aware of this.

 

So... the Nazis were TERRIBLE... but the Trotskyites who founded the murderous Soviet Union were just a bunch of nice guys, "free thinking" academics???




.

 

Your whiney stormfront sentiments aren't going to go over anywhere but stormfront. If you want to try to sell people to your struggle try making your case with a little bit of masculinity instead of showing some woman in a forest with a "Preserve her..." caption.

 

Those numbers have actually dropped since the end of the Cold War. Most of it was propaganda. Take Stalin. During the Cold War it was claimed that he ordered the killings of tens of millions of people, whether through executions of ordering famers to move to factory work. That's down now to the low millions and most of those starved, which turned out to be needed for their fight against the Germans, who would have killed far more had they won.

 

No. I would argue that Trotskyites were elitists that utilized their positions in Czar society to recreate it in their own image.

 

Once again, I was expressly clear in my answer. You asked, I answered. If you wish to change the parameters to go from impression from symbology to actual actions that is a different question.

 

The difference is that the Communists killed people for more rational reasons, if you want to go there. The Nazis killed them because they were of the wrong race.

 

Wow, this is probably the most retarded post i've seen all week.

 

The only form of rational killing is in self-defense, and I mean when your life is on the line. I would even question killing out of self-defense.

 

What part of it is retarded?

The communists killed people because they viewed them as threats, or that they needed to increase production, at the expense of growing food, because they knew that eventually the Nazis would attack them.

The Nazis killed people, not because they viewed the people as a threat, but because they believed that mixing the blood of these people with the blood of the Aryans would create a bastard people not fit to live.

 

The other thing is that you can't separate Nazism from genocide because at its core that is what Nazism is about.

You can separate communism from killing, genocide, etc because at its core that isn't what it is about.

There is a difference once you ignore the propaganda from the Cold War.

 

The Communist killed people because they A. were completely inept at running a nation and B. because they were counter revolutionaries or perceived threats to the revolution.

National Socialist killed people because they were A. unable to deport them and fell into a state of total war and B. because they were perceived threats to the revolution.

If you're excusing the psychopathic and deranged horror show that was unleashed on the Russian and East European people by the Soviets because it wasn't racially motivated you're either completely ignorant of what took place or a sympathizer of the Communist revolution and thus blinded by your idealism.

 

STRAWMAN ARGUMENT ALERT!

Thanks for letting me win. You automatically lose when you engage in logical fallacies. Thanks for trying though. Gold star.