You don't have to like gays to support gay marriage.

Oh really. It's not uncommon for gay lovers to kill each other in fits of rage. just ask Versace, oh wait, he's dead because his gay lover shot him in the face on his doorsteps in Miami for "cheating"..go figure..

And I also recall a gay guy was on Donohue some years ago that killed his gay lover for making a move on him when he wasn't down for that.

Now comes the Gay couple raising a kid to be gay when he's not, oh the horror hen he finds out the truth. Don't think it can't happen.

 

Whose argument is based upon the fact that not all heterosexuals procreate?

 

Yep, the writing is on the wall for the bigots. Your days are numbered. Bigotry is no longer acceptance in civilized society.

 

How many heterosexuals have you heard of killing their spouse for the same insane reasons you have listed? I can name a few, making your "point" irrelevant.

 

Oh, really, you have some statistics on how "uncommon" it is for "gay lovers to kill each other in fits of rage"?

Why don't we compare them to domestic violence statistics among heterosexual couples? Obviously husbands never beat their wives, wives never shoot their husbands, somehow this is something gay people do.

 

There are more instances of male violence in general perhaps due to the fact that evolution designed them to be apex predators and hunters and they now sit in cubicles?

 

Don't blame me--blame the lexicon. I've said, now for the 3rd time, we can call it something else if you'd like. I'm open for suggestions. But you'd rather play games instead it appears.

 

But perversion is. makes sense. NOT

 

Semantics.

 

Perversion? It's as natural as heterosexuality and far more natural than you typing on your PC. (Think about that.)

 

Im not concerned with what its called but concerned with what in fact it is. All the court cases mandating gay marriage held that ONLY denying gays marriage presented a constitutional issue to be corrected.

 

Absolutely true!

 

Bigotry is perversion. Homosexuality is not.

 

You're not a pervert. His opinion doesn't matter. If you're happy...(*)(*)(*)(*) any of the rest of us who think we ought to have an opinion about it. Who is anyone to tell you about your life? Not some dude with a yoda avatar...or Waldorf and Statler.

 

Correct. The only opinion that matters os the one from the guy with the Red Wings av!

 

Well you're the one who got all semantically pedantic. So which is it?

 

Perversion is a concept describing those types of human behavior that are excessive or deviated from what is considered to be orthodox or normal .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perversion

Surely you are not trying to claim that homosexuality is orthodox, are you?

'Orthodox', in the English sense, is generally used to mean the adherence to accepted norms, more specifically to creeds, especially in religion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthodoxy

Normal?

"Normal" is also used to describe when someone's behaviour conforms to the most common behaviour in society.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normality_(behavior)

Not even close on either account.

 

You call it "gay marriage" bacause thats what it is. Calling it same sex marriage changes nothing. Its still "gay marriage"

 

You are assuming you know the 'replacement level' and, the planet is not overpopulated. Take a ride in a plane sometime and look down, most of the planet is vacant land. The only over-populated areas are metropolitan areas where liberals live and despoil their own surroundings while blaming everyone else.

State marriage licenses are not the 'government teet.'

 

Exactly what is your point here? Just come out and say it.

 

Tax advantages, entitlements, and other financial benefits most certainly are.

 

You just made the case that heterosexual coupling is most normal and natural. Thanks...

OK so, since the overwhelming majority of human beings marry a person of the opposite sex regardless of government largesse so, it would seem that heterosexuality is overwhelmingly normal and natural. Government supports lots of societal programs and most are liberal million/billion dollar boondoggles, heterosexual marriage is not one of them. In fact, it could be argued that heterosexual marriage produces a whole new crop of taxpayers. Unlike homosexual couples that are basically non-productive.

 

No those are meant to support married, heterosexual families because that is the foundation of our society. In other words, married, heterosexual couples actually contribute more than they receive from the State as opposed to homosexual couples who cannot contribute equally but want the fantasy of equality bestowed on them by the State.

 

Sorry, but how the hell do married heterosexual couples contribute more than married homosexual couples?

 

He's meaning giving birth to children. I think he forgets that lesbians have a womb.