jews did not kill germans pre WW2, while palestinians attacked the jewish when they came to israel by the allowence of the british who controlled the land back there, then at 1948 attacked the newly created israel, lost the battle and ran out of israel, so if you compare the reasons, wait, its not even close enough to compare it, hitler was a crazy murderer that wanted to rule the world and beside 6 million jews killed 17 million rusians and much more from other countries in europ
Indeed. You can't be waging war, which is itself premised on pre-emptive aggression, if you are resisting the said aggression.
It's not for anybody other than those under the jackboot to determine whatever tactics they deem necessary in helping to prevent further incursions onto their land.
It's not for anybody other than those under the jackboot to determine whatever tactics they deem necessary in helping to prevent further incursions onto their land.
Firing rockets into non-military targets is not resistance it is terrorism. If it was resistance they would be blowing up tanks and planes not schools and buses. Besides that they would have no reason to resist if they stopped firing rockets in the first place because then Israel would have no reason to retaliate.
That is a blunt lie. Here is the list of Attacks from Gaza on Israel this month before Israel responded:
Reminds me of the story of the Algerian resistance leader in the 1950s who, when asked by a French miliary commander why it was that the former bombed French cafes and Bistros in Algiers, replied that he would have hit the French military compounds directly if he had had at his disposal the logistical and military power of his opponent. By defintion, it's not Israel that retaliates but the Palestinian's given it's the case that the former occupies the land of the latter.
The Bible stories were initiation stories, not fact. They were symbolic and anyway they are of Semite Jews. The Jews who inhabit Israel are not Semites but many Palestinians are.
It means that Germany doesn't have a right to northern poland, Japan has no right to korea, Turkey doesnt have a right to the entire balkan region, the iranians don't have a right to greece, Italy has no right to all of europe and england has no right to northern france. What you used to own way back in "the day" is irrelevant." Would you like for turkey to get all of the middle east? Because their ownership is far more recent than Israels. You don't get to pick and choose which parts are legitimate conquest and which parts illegitimate. Israel is waving their "God gave us this land" defense for all it's worth, doesn't hold up any more than Britain's reconquest of Egypt would.
Politicians pockets have been well lined, it is said 80% of the British Parliament is in Israels pocket but not the peoples, the people of the World have turned against you almost completely. even Americans are turning against you and that I never thought I would see that happen. Every day more and more. In the end it will just be the Bible thumpers on your side.
LOL. Very well stated Besides the dude is lying, There simply is no international law declaring occupations illegal. The UN has never declared occupation illegal either (the UNGA has no authority to pass legal judgement in the first place). In fact the UNSC (resolution 242) declared it legal as the outcome of the 1967 war and called on both parties to make peace based on land (i.e. end of occupation) for peace formula. Israel said yes, the arab world said no.
The UN has declared that Israel allowing their own people to settle on occupied Palestinian land is illegal.
I see, this is of course very different from your first post I quoted which was all about writings. So with this explanation I have to ask whether Poland has the right it currently asserts over what was previously parts of eastern Germany and likewise Russia over previous parts of Poland and Finland etc. etc.?
See, I told you, you people are lying (ignorant or both). The occupations are not illegal, some aspects of occupations might be debatable which does not make occupations illegal. Occupation is a legal and legitimate war-time and post-war status which is resolved within the context of the peace treaty between warring parties. Unfortunately the Arab world rejects the idea of peace with Israel on any reasonable (i.e. non-suicidal for Israel) conditions. Those two arab states that made peace with Israel got every inch of their land back which further proves my point. PS what part of (*)(*)(*)(*) the UN did you not understand? LOL
