‘US, Russia plunging into new Cold War’

Russia's problem is that they consider sovereign nations to be a part of their back yard.

 

Because you are clueless, unable to even grasp the meaning of missile defense

 

But why the former Soviet Union presumably didn't, having been split into its various component parts.

 

Ah, that'll be it....Lol.

 

You people are clueless. Stationary silos can be taken out with a wide variety of weapons systems in a wide variety of locations. No need for radar installations in particular areas.

 

So.

To summarise.

Everyone is clueless, including a native Russian, save for Dixon on the internet.

 

They see it as an affront to their ability to nuke Europe.

 

Our War Cabinet was re-branded Orwellian-style to The Ministry of Defence. Do you understand why they did that?

 

Our War Cabinet was re-branded Orwellian-style to The Ministry of Defence. Do you understand why they did that?

 

Please stop the petty dodging and prove your claim
or admit you made it up
how is any 1 supposed to take you seriously otherwise no matter how often you use the right words?

 

USA has been waging war on Russia for quite a while.
They blew up Chernobyl to ruin large areas. It was the great heroism of Russian and Ukraine men who stopped the reactor from being far worse a disaster than it was.

They supported the Chechnians, and the "Muslim" murderers and terrorists against Yugoslavia, and Belsan.

They destroyed the Russian economy with "democracy" so that their buddies could plunder the nation.

They expected Putin to further assist in completely dismantling Russia. That's partly why they hate him so much.

They sunk the Kursk.

They have planted attack forces all around Russia.

And they destroyed Libya, and are attempting to destroy Syria to prepare a vast "Muslim" army of crazed killers to attack Russia.

And that is just part of their efforts to destroy Russia.

 

I think it all fell to bits when the US sent forces into Russia to help kill the revolution in 1917. Messing in another country's internal politics generally causes resentment.
Sort of went downhill from there.

 

It is standard US military operating procedure to target civilians:
US General Sherman: "We are not fighting against enemy armies, but against an enemy people, both young and old, rich and poor, and they must feel the iron hand of war in the same way as organized armies."

They did it to the Indians, Germans, Japanese, Philippinos, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Yugoslavia, Iraqis, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Libya and now Syria.
The only reason there is trouble is because of the USA and her Talmudic lovers.

 

Actually, the US forces that invaded Russia were there to help the revolution.

 

This is another reason that the Talmudic war crazies in the USA hate Russia:


Another reason is that the Talmudists have hated Russia since Russia wrecked their nice Khazar kingdom racket.

Another reason is that Russians are a significant portion of Christian Israel.

 

Whereas the US of AIPAC is really keen on having a Russian presence in Cuba and the Chinese in Mexico.

Yanqui, go home.

 

I think you should provide proof when you make an accusation of that sort.

 

You can see why I don't like or trust secret socieites, like the Masons, right?

They've always been bedfellows of the chosenites too.

 

Good points but not sure about Chernobil, and Kursk sink? Would you tell little more.

 

No. Just trolling each other.

USA problem is that they consider sovereign nations to be a part of their back yard.
Corrected in the name of TRUTH.

 

I think Indofred should go research the story of the guy who ordered the reactor into self destruct phase, and the US engineers who designed the paricular explosive flaw for the reactor at Chernobyl, IF HE REALLY WANTS TO KNOW FOR HIMSELF.
Most of the time, most of the posters at these forums totally discount any sort of research or testimony unless it comes from the Rabbis that control the government and the news media.
Our national history has abundant episodes of lies and coverup that have been exposed, but most so called Americans don't want to know the truth. They prefer the comforting lies they get on TV. A few examples, President Wilson lobbying for WW1, FDR's effort to create Pearl Harbor event, Hiroshima, 3 Kennedy assasinations, Gulf of Tonkin scam, Bush the First setting up Iraq for the first Gulf war, Colin Powell, 9/11, various mass shootings in the USA and of course many other events of similar ilk.

 

3 points:
1. The US has attacked and sunk Russian submarines before the Kursk: One was sunk in the Pacific and the SS Glomar Explorer was sent to raise the sunken sub. Unfortunately for the CIA, the part of the sub they wanted broke off.........so the story goes. They wanted the communications equipment on the sub.

2. The US had attack submarines in the area at the time.

3. This picture of the Kursk's hull:


Regarding Chernobyl:
An administrator of the reactor facility came to the reactor at night under the guise of running a test. He had 2 operator technicians shut down the reactor's cooling system until the core heated up enough to run away.
No one ever prosecuted the administrator.
Yet he was nervous and anxious when he came to start the "test".
For several days after the explosion, other parties to this effort refused to warn anyone of the radiaton being released.
No one wants to discuss the motives of the initial shut down.
These are tell tale signs that nearly everyone is lying about the event for some reason or reasons.

 

No we didn't. Where do you get such nonsense. It was an accident, but of course you'll call conspiracy.

Our Russia was proof that Communism doesn't work and is nothing short of pure corruption.

Again, this was another accident, but you'll again call for conspiracy instead of realizing it was probably nothing more than shotty production.

There is a difference between a missile shield and putting warheads on an island.

You just can't help but bring the Masons up can you? My affiliation has nothing to do with my opinion.

 

Is there some problem with my bringing up the Masons? Am I obligated to like or approve of them, secret societies, and those that then work in high office, where they should be most accountable? The answer to all of those things is 'no'. Once again, and for the second time today, you seem to want to control the thoughts and emotions of others.

Why don't you speak for you. And I will speak for me. You good with that?

 

It's irrelevant to the discussion and all you are trying to do is undermine my credibility by saying I am somehow influenced by the Masons (who you for some reason believed are intimately tied to some Jewish conspiracy).

I could care less if you approve of them or not, but with your character, personality, and beliefs, I feel that I belong to a good group. It still stands though that bringing them up is irrelevant to the discussion and all you're trying to do is attack the messenger and not the message which is a violation of the rules.