Can't we end the income tax and go with a 13% sales tax ?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Channe, Feb 7, 2014.

  1. Channe

    Channe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Messages:
    14,961
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm tired of seeing what I really made vs what I actually got. It's depressing and feels like theft. It's nothing now, but it's 2014. Isn't time we just put a sales tax of 13% on all sales and services. It's more fair. LET ME KEEP WHAT I WANT EARN, DAMMIT !
     
  2. LivingNDixie

    LivingNDixie New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,688
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What is the logic of 13%?
     
  3. Channe

    Channe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Messages:
    14,961
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    13%, 25%, WHATEVER it takes to keep our nation going.
    But at least I'll get to dictate the amount I'm feeding the beast.
     
  4. Paul8591

    Paul8591 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2014
    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I agree with you. In the history we have seen that governments used to tax the items not the earnings of the people. Unless and until it is some treasure.

    So people knew it at that time, we could buy the things only if we will work.

    I think , this is also a good idea today. It will solve lot of problems.
     
  5. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Great plan if you want to help the 1% get even more of the nation's wealth and income and run up a (*)(*)(*)(*)load more debt.
     
  6. Gemini_Fyre

    Gemini_Fyre New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,087
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exactly. They don't want you, me, anybody to have that power. Then they might actually have to listen to us.
     
  7. Channe

    Channe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Messages:
    14,961
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no, now is the scam because the middle class is paying 27% taxes and the richest Americans are using their laywers and loopholes to avg about 10%, and some pay none.

    with this, the rich who will obviously buy more expensive things will be contributing the same percentage value as all others

    in theory, a man who spent $100,000 in one year on good and services would have contributed (if sales tax were 20%) $20,000 towards funding the gov.t'

    and a richer man who spent $1 million that same year would have contributed $200,000
     
  8. Strasser

    Strasser Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,219
    Likes Received:
    526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    these 'Fair Tax' scams don't fly because they invariably include a whole raft of 'exemptions' for the usual suspects and the tax burden is left almost entirely on the backs of those least able to afford it. Put a 13% sales tax on stock market sales which is mostly just gambling, no different than playing craps or slot machines, for instance, and see how many middle and upper class voters contribute to your re-election campaign next year.
     
  9. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree that is a scam, though on average, the rich do pay a little more than the middle class. But the remedy is to fix the scam, not impose a new unjust system.
    Not true. The richest tend to save most of their income and spend less of it. So if a rich person spends 50% of his money and a poor person spends 100% of his, the poor person is paying 100% of the tax rate and the rich person is paying 50% of the tax rate.

    It is in effect a regressive tax on the poor.
    And if he made $100,000, that would be 20% of his income.

    And if he made $2 million, that would be only 10% of his income.

    Great plan for the rich guy.
     
  10. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,149
    Likes Received:
    19,987
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I think a fear may be people may clam up on buying. And that will be bad for economy. IMO.
     
  11. Strasser

    Strasser Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,219
    Likes Received:
    526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, yes, since state and local sales taxes in many areas are already in the 8% to 10% range already.
     
  12. little voice

    little voice New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    2,248
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This would never work when you consider
    They would eliminate incentives to donate to Charity
    And it would greatly reduce consumer spending
    And a person earning $100,000 a year pays nowhere near $20,000 income tax
    That is if they know how to properly file income tax
     
  13. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just saying .... sales tax passes from the stores to the consumer and it decreases sales , lack of demand kills the economy.
     
  14. Channe

    Channe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Messages:
    14,961
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you misread - I said a person SPENDING $100,000 on services and goods would have contributed $20,000 in taxes
     
  15. little voice

    little voice New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    2,248
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry
    But most people think they pay a larger percentage than they do
     
  16. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So instead we should have an economy stabilized by theft?
     
  17. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Apologies but i don't want to derail the thread , i will only say that the state and it's laws including taxation exist with your consent so where the hell you see theft?
     
  18. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I didn't vote in support of them, so no, they do not have my consent.
     
  19. Channe

    Channe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Messages:
    14,961
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no, it's not - when did I give consent for my state and federal to take out what they do ? I am giving away $.27 for every $1 that I make - I don't remember agreeing to this.
     
  20. Mjolnir

    Mjolnir New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You choose to be a part of this society, and taxes are what you pay for that privilege. If you don't like it, you're welcome to leave. It's no more "theft" than a coffee shop asking me to pay for my drink.
     
  21. AdvancedFundamentalist

    AdvancedFundamentalist New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Then make more.

    If it feels like theft then that would be your delusion that you think you shouldn't have to pay taxes.

    Fair is irrelevant.
     
  22. AdvancedFundamentalist

    AdvancedFundamentalist New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Find another country with a better deal and move there.

    It is your delusion that you should not have to pay taxes.
     
  23. Sadanie

    Sadanie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    14,427
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wouldn't mind if two conditions were met:

    1. NECESSITIES (such as basic food, basic services, and basic clothing ) were totally exempt from taxation.
    2. If there was a two level sales taxes: one for ordinary needs and wants (i.e., a TV, a Fridge, shoes, basic cars, houses below $500,000, basic services) and one for "luxury" wants (i.e., yachts, luxury cars, mansions, jewelry, furs, pools, etc. . .) which would be taxed at 25 or 30%.

    Then I could be interested in it. Because obviously, people who make $35,000 a year spend EVERY PENNY they have just to "survive." so they would be taxed on EVERY PENNY they make, while people making $1 million a year, would only spend a fraction of that money, and thus would only be taxed on a small amount (let's even say $500,000).
     
  24. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gentlemen, meet JJ Rousseau .

    and remember: without some form of a government you can not have any property claims .
     
  25. goober

    goober New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    6,057
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    0
    33% on everything.....even home sales.......
     

Share This Page