Is Muslim Immigration a Form of Conscious Invasion That Should Be Resisted?

Funny you mention this because the very europeans who practiced genocide in america were themselves outcasts in european societies. outcasts as in they were despised and thought of as lowly, take the irish for example and the pilgrims. these guys were criminals in their homelands and because of this inferiority complex the resulting horrifying episodes in america occurred. when someone is bullied (euro american colonists) they in turn become a bully. much like pedophillia, where the victims of abuse themselves become the perp.

 

yep, thats why the mexicans are flooding your borders and taking over by numbers, not by genocidal tactic used by euro colonialists. the land belongs to whoever can control it, For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night

 

Who were you indoctrinated by ?

Revisionism is part of Marxist culturalism.

As for Spain and the Spanish conquistadors and their handling of the Aztec problem in the "New World", their brutal means came from the Muslims who ruled Spain from the 700 a.d. to 1400 a.d.

Spain was very contaminated by Islam for 600 years.

 

When there are no longer any white tax payers to pay for free stuff for the Mexican invaders, they'll go back to the cartels in Mexico.

Back during the 1980's when the world thought Mexico was on the verge of a revolution, overthrowing the ruling class, President Reagan had CIA director William Casey to look into what the hell was going on down south of the border.

When Casey got back to Reagan he reported that there would not be a revolution in Mexico. That Mexicans refuse to face their problems infact they run away from their problems.

Then Casey told Reagan there's a big problem, the Mexicans running away from their problems but were running towards El Norte and that they were bringing their politics and problems with them.

This is what caused Reagan to support the 1986 Immigration Reform Act, to secure the borders and to enforce immigration laws with in the interior. But the liberal Democrats refused to come on board unless there was an amnesty for the illegal alien criminals. The Democrats swore that it would be a one time amnesty never to be repeated again. It was just another lie from the left. There were six more amnesties snuck through Congress during the Clinton administration.

BTW: When Reagan put Harold Ezell in charge of the western region of the INS, he actually started enforcing America's immigration laws until CPUSA, Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), MEChA, La Raza, MALDEF and the radical left started yelling "racism." Ezell was forced to resign. Our borders have been wide open ever since.

You'll know when the Constitution and the nations laws that are on the books are being enforced, when the radical left starts yelling racism.

 

And the muslims learnt that from the Romans who contaminated Afrika/Israel, they generally liked to lynch anybody who disagreed with their laws and throw dissenters to the lions, thoroughly good folk.

 

they cant even get along in the middle east with each other i doubt they collectivally plot to take over the world by immigration.

 

The Romans were also fairly brutal people and so was Britain, Belgium, France, etc. Is Islam to blame for all the things these countries did to other people?

 

"I against my brother, my brothers and I against my cousins, then my cousins and I against strangers"

Pretty much sums up Semites.

 

what are you quoting

 

They are really trying to push this idea that Muslims are coordinating some sort of religious Jihad on the world but they don't have the money, the don't have the material.

I hgihly doubt these terrorists are really Muslims trying to wage war on the world. Operation Gladio clearly shows how the US and other European countries staged false terrorist events in order to scare people into accepting their particular views on foreign or economic policy. It's a shame, but some Americans are so stupid, they really believe that third and second world countries and a religion is actually trying to wage war against first world, nuclear-armed countries that vastly outpace them in almost every field concerning combat.

I'd like to ask the room, what is the real benefit of all these scattered terrorist attacks for Muslim's? What has it done, but provided an excuse for the First World nations to bear down on Muslim peoples all over the world with an even harder hand? There's absolutely no benefit in terrorism, it makes absolutely no sense in any way.

 

I think you have a little problem, there were no Muslims around until starting around 610 a.d. or so.

 

To think those damn Romans called my ancestors barbarians when they raped, pillaged and burned Rome down.

 

Tell me about it. And northern Europe had been trying to imitate Rome ever since. With success, unfortunately.

I think it might be psychological in some way how people view themselves and others. If your neighbor kills a man, he's evil. If your brother kills a man, he's misunderstood. Actually, I think the best way to illustrate it is comics. When the good guys go 5 versus 1 against a bad guy, it's team work. When the bad guy does it, it's foul play.

 

yes ido have a little problem. there was no spain in 600ad either, there was however iberia. you mistake modern spanish with Iberians. different people but idigress.

- - - Updated - - -

and caucusasians

 

Lol...Is Western imperialist meddling all over the world a form of conscious invasion that should be resisted?
Get back to us when Muslims start to invade countries, orchestrate coups, carry out drone strikes and air strikes that kill indiscriminately, and install military bases all around the world on foreign soil.
If the US was subjected to the sort of treatment that we dish out to foreign countries every day, our entire population would be up in arms resisting the invaders and colonizers, so spare us the ignorant, bigoted bull(*)(*)(*)(*), eh?

 

Cheerleading the destruction of the world economy is a bit psychotic you know. Wherever you live, if the U.S. Goes down you go down. Hoping the U.S. Turns into Mexico makes you an anarchist.

 

its not cheerleading the destruction of the world, it is cheerleading the destruction of the racist political and economic specter that is the G8 (illumiNazi) and everybody who associates with them. Come back to me when there is non white veto powers.

 

Well, I could be ignorant but I'd like to have a clear answer. What you are posting could be true, and possibly would make a good thread of your own, but it does not address the issue being discussed in this thread.

 

I read a good article about the latest anti-Muslim hysterics and I think that it might answer your question about what I think of all this.

http://www.vox.com/2015/2/7/7995803/obama-crusades

 

In a similar thread it was pointed out that, among the Muslim sects, it is the Salafists that seem most prone to violence, although it is apparently a mixed bag even with them.

"Salafi movement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Salafist movement, also known as the Salafi movement, is a movement within Islam that references the Salafist doctrine known as Salafism. Many Muslims in Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia identify as Salafists:[1] 46.87% in Qatar,[1] 44.8% in UAE,[1] 5.7% in Bahrain and 2.17% in Kuwait.[1]
Salafis are the "dominant minority" in Saudi Arabia.[2] There are 4 million Saudi Salafis, with that country's population being described as 22.9% Salafis while most of the rest are Wahhabi.[3][1] The Salafi movement is often described as synonymous with Wahhabism, but Salafists consider the term "Wahhabi" derogatory.[4] Observers differ over whether Salafi are the same as Wahhabis or not. At other times, Salafism has been described as a hybrid of Wahhabism and other post-1960s movements.[5] Salafism has become associated with literalist, strict and puritanical approaches to Islam – and, particularly in the West, with the Salafi Jihadis who espouse offensive jihad against those they deem to be enemies of Islam as a legitimate expression of Islam.[6]
Academics and historians have used the term "Salafism" to denote "a school of thought which surfaced in the second half of the 19th century as a reaction to the spread of European ideas" and "sought to expose the roots of modernity within Muslim civilization."[7][8] However contemporary Salafis follow "literal, traditional ... injunctions of the sacred texts", looking to Ibn Taymiyyah rather than the "somewhat freewheeling interpretation" of 19th century figures Muhammad Abduh, Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, and Rashid Rida.[9][10] The Muslim Brotherhood is often differentiated from Salafi, although the group did include the term in the "About Us" section of its website.[11]
It is often reported from various sources, including the German domestic intelligence service, that Salafism is the fastest-growing Islamic movement in the world.[12][13][14][15]"


The whole Wikipedia article was interesting but difficult to absorband I was left with a mild headache [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafi_movement].
I suppose the accounts of the various supposedly Christian sects is just as headache-producing to non-Westerners.