UK says it 'may exclude' Trump after petition to ban him gets 565,000 signatures

Maybe the Brits are inclined to shun demagogues and troublemakers. That's their prerogative.

 

That would be funny if Trump became president. Hhahahahahaha... Sorry, Britian... I know you wanted that trade agreement, but since Trump is "excluded" from visiting your island, maybe next time...

remember when the Huffpo use to put Trump in the entertainment section of their website??? but were later forced to put him in the news section... hahahahaha.. liberals are so stupid.

 

Right.. so what is being checked? I have asked what 8 times now? If you dont want people to think you are trolling provide something.. Debate something.. anything..

 

There is nothing to debate, the op wrote there was no vetting of Syrian Refugees coming into the UK, I provided proof that the British Home Secretary requires those refugees to be vetted. If you think those vetting procedures do not exist, are not adequate or are not being done provide some evidence, simples!

 

It's the same vague generalities that the US politicians spew out --- you know they check "stuff" and ask like, questions and things during conducted interviews by "people" who are anonymous.

 

Yup. WTF

And in another WTF: Trump’s strongest Republican supporters: Registered Democrats?



His supporters appear to be a blend of nationalism, center-left economics, and Jacksonian foreign policy.

 

That is a coalition that might even beat an entire united bipartisan alliance. Never underestimate the voter pull of a shrewd populist.

 

The liberals of UK banning non-liberal Americans who are outspoken is nothing new. They banned Michael Savage as example.

We should put buses at all Southern US entry points for free bus rides to the nearest major airport where they are given free 1-way flights to the UK. Anyone from Mexico, Central America and South America who wants to go to the UK and those wonderfully generous people gets a free ride courtesy of Uncle Sam.

 

So 565,000 Brits oppose him and 63,600,000 do not?

Apparently Trump would win election in the UK by an unprecidented landslide!

Since there are 2,660,116 Muslims in the UK, he'd even carry the Muslim vote!!

 

Michael Savage is a loud, abusive creep who sends spittle flying.

 

Lol at the vetted claim, anyone objectively looking at how it's done would have to say this process is a joke.... Unless you're uneducated and just don't know any better. Either way, usa > uk!!

 

Yeah it wouldn't be the side that dumps (*)(*)(*)(*) and feces on returning GI's being the cowards right? Wait, isn't one of those people running for president.

Our collective values are continually being destroyed, you know, like the right to bear arms? On of our oldest values in America, and I've watched you argue against it vehemently, making you a hypocrit.

What about assimilation? On of Americas oldest values, the left completely obliterated that idea. instead now we harass people holding onto the idea of people assimilating into our society instead of making special exceptions for them.

Hint hint, you can't vet anybody when ISIS has the machines used to make the documents.

 

You provided nothing outside of claims and promises/

 

The op wrote there was no vetting of Syrian Refugees coming into the UK, I provided proof that the British Home Secretary requires those refugees to be vetted. If you think those vetting procedures do not exist, are not adequate or are not being done provide some evidence, simples!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...she-promises-refugees-to-be-vetted-twice.html

 

As you cant even say what documents are being checked of course they are not adequate. Instead of admitting this you play stupid little games.

 

No it is the fact I will not play your stupid little games, now do you have any evidence that the government of the UK are not vetting Syrian Refugees?

 

Yes her own words.

Next thread.. see you there as you have no interest in civil discussion in this one.

 

Again you seem to think I should take the word of an anonymous nobody on the internet with no evidence rather than the British Home Secretary! You offer nothing to discuss.

 

I would laugh if he became president and a large scale insurrection occurred with in the British population.

With the growing numbers of immigrants who refuse to assimilate, it's becoming more likely.

 

How can you check documents if ISIS captured the machines to make them?

All it takes is one person to infiltrate another Burea and now they have a completely unchecked passport flood, they could literally send a thousand people to the border and every single one of them could walk right through.

 

You got asked to support your motivation by some evidence / link.
And you're now actually refusing to do so.

 

If they could walk on water!
All refugees come from refugee camps, you could not "send a thousand people to the border" it is impossible!

 

I think you should go by evidence instead of trying to make it personal constantly.. She provided nothing.

- - - Updated - - -

Hardly no one can provide what documents they are looking at or whom they are interviewing.. To fill in this lack of details she says they are going to do it.. twice as if that settles anything. Of course thats all Brits need...

 

If that is what they are telling you, and you actually believe them, then so be it. We are saying that countries use the same documents, and there aren't any. Buildings housing documents have been destroyed. You would be taking them at their word when they show your passport or other documentation. Haven't you ever heard of fake ID? ISIS has said that they are planting terrorists in with refugees. They don't lie about things like that. That means that they phony papers, but they look legitimate. If your "Home Secretary wants to play around with his citizens' safety, that's on the UK, but we do NOT want that here.

 

Exactly what is the vetting process in the UK? You have to be specific. You obviously take the dude at his word, but we would like to know exactly HOW these people are being vetted. If you don't know the answer, why are you trusting them?