UK says it 'may exclude' Trump after petition to ban him gets 565,000 signatures

Yes,they say, "Are you a terrorist? The person answers "no" and the UK says, "Welcome to the UK." End of vetting. Sounds good to me.

 

To be fair they ask them twice

 

LOL I guess they want to be sure.

 

And here we have the panty wetters in full flow. British Home Secretary says Syrians Refugees are being vetted and with absolutely no evidence otherwise and with no knowledge of what that vetting procedure is they start to question it! It really is laughable you want me to find out the details of the vetting procedure that you say is not good enough without any knowledge of it. One American even thought that ISIS would just swamp the border and walk on through! When there is no (*)(*)(*)(*)ing land border! So it stands, the British Home Secretary has put in place vetting procedures and they are being used. Original OP was wrong when they stated there were no vetting procedures . Some American panty wetters think that they know the British Home Secretary is not doing her job, because they said so, pathetic!

 

Britain has the right to ban anyone they like from entering their country, based on their offensive or extremist public views.

 

I didn't see anyone claiming anything. Which documents are bring checked is a simple questing? Ignoring it is a simple answer.

 

Those that have researched this situation know that there is no way to properly vet Syrian refugees. Thus, when you espouse trust in a process claiming the impossible, people are calling you on it.

 

No the OP stated that there was no vetting, I proved that wrong. Others now claim that the vetting procedure is not good enough, so I asked them to prove it. I suspect they have not even bothered to look into the vetting process being carried out by the UK. So do you want to expand on the details of the vetting process used by the UK government and then show how it is impossible.

 

Well, this diatribe was no more helpful or enlightening than your other ones as to how the UK vets these people which means you have no clue. It is sad and scary that the UK has as many lemmings as the US when it comes to believing everything that the government tells them without questioning anything. " My Home Secretary told me it's so, so it must be true." LOL

 

If the uk government has it figured out, they should explain it to the fbi because they said they currently couldn't do it.

 

the USA allows in 800,000 immigrants a year.

and 10,000 refugees a year.

since 1990, how many of them have committed terrorism?

 

There have been a few Somalis who have left to join ISIS or Boko Haram and others who have left for ISIS. And let us not forget the San Bernardino terrorist as the most recent. Who knows how many others are planning something. It only takes one to do damage. How many do you want?

 

Source it that Syrians got no papers. Last time I checked,.. they had plenty of mobile phones, so...

 

"which documents are bring checked" is not a simple question.
it's real crooked English.

 

Yes we understand, in wet panty land " I heard it from this bloke on the internet" carries much more weight
We know you are scared, you cannot trust your government and the Syrians are coming!

 

What vetting procedures? Your link mentioned Documents ( what documents) and Interviews.. That is it. . That is all you have.

Its fine. Blindly trust her hell put a crown on her head if you like it doesnt change the situation.

 

That's your answer to the question? Crooked English? sometimes these Ipads have a mind of their own. Now which documents are being checked?we already know not many, if any, if Tashfeen Malik is any example.

 

I really don't care about England, but when you say that you believe your politician just because "she said so", it is absolutely ridiculous and you know it. When there is a UK attack, we will see who " wets her panties."

 

Tashfeen Malik filled in a 21 page visa application, with supporting documents.
And it has been concluded, no errors have been made with the checking of it

source

 

Are you suggesting that all the Syrians are going to fill out K-1 Visas?

 

No, you're right, and we don't need petitions; we leave it to our security services to deal with hate-mongering Islamists, then we export them to you. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/20/abu-hamza-david-cameron-theresa-may

 

And you know ISIS has these machines, how exactly?

 

Many people arrive with diseases like tuberculosis and no discernible skills. Meanwhile, there are doctors and engineers from civilized countries that are barred from immigrating.

We are the kindest and dumbest nation on the planet.

 

I replied to a post who claimed Malik documents weren't checked.... but they were.
And why would all the Syrians fill a K-1 visa? Hardly any go to the US.
So I certainly aint suggesting that at all.

 

So . . . more thorough than Trump's "Just ask 'em" plan to keep Muslims out.