Trump: I could 'shoot somebody' and I wouldn't lose voters

Great point!

There's about as much proof they were killed by the Clinton Machine as there is about WMD and Bush lying.

 

The Vince Foster conspiracy theory is not supported by any evidence at all.

The fact that the Bush adminstration lied in peddling its case for war in Iraq has long been well established and thoroughly documented.

 

Lets get this straight, Bush lying is nothing but a conspiracy theory, the terms "thoroughly documented and well established" are nothing but putting a pretty bow on a piece of garbage.

Look up conspiracy theory, it's dead on what you are trying to peddle.

 

Enjoy making your claims, but you can't document any of them, because we both know they're false.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/05/senate.iraq/index.html?iref=nextin

 

So if some slack-jawed KKK moron shot one of those, would you want a parade for him, yes or no?

If he does it before November, will he get your vote?

 

What the hell is "documenting" something that's a conspiracy, doesn't make a bit of sense!

 

That's how partisan politics works. Look at how many sheeple on this forum still plan on voting for clinton for confirmation.

 

It was said in jest and anyone with a sense of humor understood it. His theory is more steeped in reality than our Prez claiming some random kid could be his son.

 

Both Trump and Hillary Clinton have too many supporters that just don't care as long as their person gets through. I think this crap started with Barack Obama.

His supporters should be cringing over Trump's statement, but they're not.

 

Whose supporters?

 

I call em the Chumpeteers. They act like the children from the Disney show.

 

Bwahahahaha! Same dumbasses came up with Vince Foster.

 

I actually haven't noticed that many members advocating for a Hillary win in the primary election!

I have seen more Sanders supporters. . .and obviously, dumb Trump supporters!

 

If you're still hung up on one "remark", which was actually a remark made about him, not by him, then you are missing the broader picture. As another suggested, it's was all just rhetorical blah blah blah. Trump supporters are a lot like the Perot supporters used to be. Mostly anti-government, but anti-government for good reason. Better to be anti-government than anti-American like the far left is. I think both Trump and Perot strike a good balance between capitalism and populism; in other words, capitalism for the middle-class.

My main concern with Trump is what he would do with any Supreme Court appointees that might come up. The SC has become nothing more than a political arm of the far left, and it needs to be reigned in as much as, if not more so than the Federal gov't itself.

 

Don't know why you struggle to have a civil discussion.

 

Nice diversion, now where's the proof about George Bush lying??? Bwahahahaha!

 

Words cannot describe the smell of your dishonesty and/or irrational fear. I swear this nation is becoming infected with wussies who spend all their waking hours finding new ways to be offended or scared.

 

I won't get suckered out on a limb with "hypotheticals", Yguy. I haven't said one (ONE) word about the KKK's members, "slack-jawed" or otherwise, and I'm not going to now. But, to respond in kind, would you want a parade for da boyz in da 'hood if dey shot somebody who was a right-wing Conservative? Do you see how stupid a question like that is...? Busted whose windshield with an axe?

 

So. . .what did I say that wasn't civil?

 

I have not the slightest concern about any such remark.

Yes, I assume you see a trap. What you don't see is that it was set by you.

No. See how easy that was?

Yes, it's plenty stupid to ask a conservative a question like that and expect him to contradict himself. What's your point?

 

Everyone has always been unconditionally loyal to their guy, it did not start with blacks and the President.