Hillary a liar? When? Where? How? Inform us.

I did. Nothing there as evidenced later by Comey's later testimony, which in fact he himself had to walk back after finding out the three emails he was in question about were marked with the wrong labels.

So you see, everything that was said that needed saying at the thirteen hour hearing that wasn't said, got said with the Comey hearing when the three emails were exposed for not being labeled properly. Which must be totally embarrassing for the committee and the FBI to find out later that their issues about her got totally smothered when they missed the wrong labeling of those three emails.

Lol! And the FBI and the committee want to talk about others being careless? Lol! What a friggin joke. They tried to give Clinton a tongue lashing and for what? Nothing, that's what!

 

There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. That being you and your fellow Clinton sheep.

 

Sorry, but without a sound rebuttal to the very facts I just laid out to you is just you conceding my point. After the three emails were found to have the wrong labels, "game over". Nothing else about this needs saying. The three emails are what were in question by Comey. Once he discovered the FBI and the committee made a boo boo, it just sort of shut down. Anything else you'd like to add to this manufactured scandal?

 

As indicated, believe what you want, the truth is far different.

 

Since nobody has presented any such evidence, we'd be lying if we said we saw that. And as we're liberals, we can't do that in good conscience. As demonstrated by decades of vile conservative-Stalinist attacks on Clinton, "The ends always justify the means for my side!" may be the conservative life philosophy, but we liberals want nothing of it.

Yes, yes, you HDS afflictees can fool your fellow corrupt cultists with your propaganda, but you can't fool honest people who actually look at the evidence. And no, repeating the same whoppers again at a higher volume won't cause reality to bend to your will, no matter how much you desire it.

 

If you liberals are so blind and stone headed as to actually believe what you have written, there truly is no hope for you.

As for your "good conscience", when are you going to start displaying that? You certainly haven't so far.

 

Have you made up your list of excuses for losing in a most humiliating fashion yet?

If you haven't, you really want to get to that. Be prepared. Beat the rush. A lot of the other Trump fans have already done it.

 

Have you gathered your riot gear to go out into the streets when Trump wins? Got your instructions from the Clintons on where to riot? Or are you to far down the list to receive them yet?

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/01/poll-trump-beats-hillary-clinton-honesty/

 

Shes too stupid to recognize classified materials but is smart enough too know when their miss labelled ? Plus who knows if she deleted any.

 

It's mind boggling for liberals to not recognize that Hillary has been and is a constant liar! They could be given a list of her top ten lies, and they would deny those facts and deflect.
I could give a long list of her lies, but "I shan't cast pearls before swine!"

 

Again, thanks! You keep proving my point. No rebuttal = concede!

 

Please do! So far all I've seen is a list of opinions by her, that included catch phrases such as "I don't know", " I believe", or general opinions while the Right turned them into lies. Lol!

- - - Updated - - -

Talk to the FBI. They initially missed those mistakes as well. I guess they're all stupid huh?

 

Did she get State Dept. approval for her shadow server and did it meet all the rules a regulations for official business especially for classified information?

 

What does this have to do with my request?

 

Very well said, and totally true. Love it when the truth blossoms so eloquently, as this explanation has done. Awesome!

 

I asked you two questions which have to do with the topic of this thread and your previous statements. Try again.

Did she get State Dept. approval for her shadow server and did it meet all the rules a regulations for official business especially for classified information?

 

Restated: no facts presented by you equals loss. You do realize that you give liberals a bad name, right?

 

The meme issued by the ideological entertainment masters in 2008 was that Obama was not qualified for the presidency because of inadequate experience.

So, the faithful parroted the peculiar mantra that a civil rights attorney who taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School between 1992 and 2004, and served as a state or US Senator from January, 1997 thru November, 2008, had no political resumé whatsoever. They supported his GOP opponent (before they had been told that he, as an American POW, was a loser!)

In 2012, their marching orders required them to vilify the President with the emphasis on that individually-mandated health insurance reform plan based upon private exchanges. (Their Carnival Cruz got so hysterical, he inexplicably shut down Yellowstone Park!) Then, they nominated and extolled the only politician in the nation who had signed into law his individually-mandated health insurance reform plan based upon private exchanges.

Go figure.

Understandably, they have had a hissyfit over their ineffectual Republican-run Congress, and rallied 'round a show business entertainer whose political resumé is so impressive it has thousands and thousands cheering in New Jersey. (You have to take his word for it - but don't look to FactCheck! for an endorsement. Look to the neo-nazi Daily Stormer or American Freedom Party for that.)

Of course, all of this is just substantive background information needed to hone in on Cinton's perfidy. No, none of those excuses for the fizzled taxpayer-funded perpetual vendetta caprices by the aforementioned ineffectual GOP-run Congress.

Seeking something really disgusting with which to assault the "wonderful woman's" judgement?

This is it:

​

Eeeyyyyew.

 

Actually, this thread has nothing to do with Hillary's emails. But if your question is, did she abide by rules and regulations, the answer is yes. And again, you are going off topic. http://thehill.com/policy/technology/234487-hillarys-emails-not-technically-illegal

And by the way, I seem to recall you starting about two dozen threads about Hillary's email, and they always turned up nothing. And your pattern of questions always seems to be about the same, and so are our answers. At this point no one knows what you expect? Your obsession with Hillary's manufactured email scandal can only be referred to those who deal with such severe conditions.

 

You couldn't resist it could you? 2 AM really interrupts my sleep pattern, but it doesn't seem to bother you now does it?

 

The Liberals, if they care to go back, will see that I produced two links of which no one from this thread has disproved, including yours truly. Believe me, Liberals are going to see real quick who earned the bad name.

 

It would take much less typing, if you just listed the times she told the truth.

But she is not a very good liar. She gets caught far too often. Of course her supporters block it out, for they have to. For its not an easy task to cover for her, unless of course you are a better liar than Clinton.

I find it funny, that the GOPhers live in denial about climate change, helped along by man, and Clinton supporters live in denial about what Clinton is. They are very much alike these GOPhers and these Demorats. They should really get along better than they do.

 

So you admit that you only post highly biased statements to make you and your fellow liberals feel a warm fuzzy. At least you admit that while trying to cover your lies.

 

No, I posted links you are unable to debunk, which means you also cannot prove them to be biased either, unless you disprove the content of those links. And since you have not done that, and can't do that, you are simply making yourself look more and more foolish with each passing post of yours. It's just that simple.