Trump Could Win Pennsylvania, May Not Debate, Rendell Says Breaking News at Newsmax.

Yeah, and Hillary wants Candy Crowley to back up all of her lies. When every news outlet says that all of Hillary's statements are 100% accurate while Trump's are 10% accurate, it kind of makes anyone look bad. Moreover, why would anyone want to go up and debate a lawyer that just laughs after getting a rapists off?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...etting-a-suspected-child-rapist-off-the-hook/

Without a debate spectacle, Hillary is left alone with her dismal record. Why distract from that?

 

Do you have Hillary tourette's? But hillary, but hillary, bu bub b but hillary!

Can you respond to what I said without crying about clinton? We're talking about the draft dodging, orange coward being scared of being emasculated by a smart woman on national TV.

 

How can you or anyone stand behind the Clinton crime legacy. They've outsource American prosperity. They accept donations from foreign countries. Clinton has had been disbarred, and you still just look away.

Trump is not a perfect candidate. But Hillary is HORRIFIC. She should be in jail, but you seem to care more about Trump's mascara that he wears on TV that looks orangish on crappy 80's TVs than anything else.

To answer your question, I would expect Trump to do the same as any other American that doesn't have experience lying in public in a debate against Hillary: Awful. You see most people make an effort to tell the truth. This is not the same for trial lawyers. They don't care at all for the truth. All they care about is how their message is conveyed to the jury. And this would give her a huge advantage. With MSNBC to back up her lies with their "TRUTH-O-METER", and Candy Crowley, how would anyone expect to get a fair shake?

 

A series of debates on national tv solves all of this.

 

What's wrong with a written Twitter discourse? Something that can be fact checked in real time by the average American? Or are we concerned about the lack of lackeys the process?

 

Clinton tourette's. You just cannot do without crying about clinton.

- - - Updated - - -

Seriously? You want a tweet fest instead of an actual debate? I understand you want to avoid the emasculation of trump on national TV. The dumbing down of America continues. This may be the dumbest suggestion i've seen this race.

 

Classy. Comparing those who don't support Clinton to the disabled. Just easier than fact checking your decision to vote for someone.

 

You just cannot respond or even try to defend trump. I get it. He's indefensible.

 

That will happen anyway. But by skipping the debates Trump could avoid humiliating himself any more than he has already done.

 

What, you don't think Trump is an expert at lying in public. Have you actually done any research. He is a master. His only weakness is he doesn't even know when he is lying. Of course on the other hand he probably doesn't know when he is telling the truth either. With Trump's mental illness the fact is that he believes whatever he says is the truth. He has an excuse being certifiably nuts but his supporters don't have the same excuse. Or at least not all of them do.

 

The difference is that PEOPLE DIED when HILLARY LIED. Take Benghazi. All she needed to do was authorize a protective force to rescue the ambassador. Instead she did nothing, and lied about it instead. To me that's a whole new level.

 

Do you know how the commercial news networks work? They take money from people to alter the news coverage. Hillary has $200 Million dollars from large corporate donors to make Trump look bad.

Let me prove it to you.
Trump says he disagrees with a Muslim father at a DNC rally, and he now "Attacks Gold Star Families".

A terrorist in England chops up at least 5 people today with a knife. (He's being called mentally deranged by the media now and his references to Islam have been stricken).
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ed-terrorist-knife-attack-central-London.html
Most networks don't mention the story because it makes Hillary look bad

Let's face it, people are stupid. They will believe the propaganda just like the Nazi's did in WWII.

 

It's been Beaten to death because people don't like to hear that their fellow citizens are being executed abroad. It is the Secretary of State's job to ensure safety at the embassies. It's pretty much her job, and she's running on her record. Why are you so anxious to move on to other issues? Perhaps you like the crappy trade deals she passed like NAFTA and GATT that helped destroy the labor market in our country. Maybe you would rather focus on her career at Wal-Mart as a union busting executive. It seems like you are anxious to avoid talking about anything that has anything to do with Hillary.

 

Just think...if all those thirteen or so BENGHAZI investigative committees had you on their panel they could have saved millions of taxpayer dollars and resolved the issue once and for all. Why didn't you call them?
I'm sure guys like Trey Gowdy and Darrell Issa would have loved to have heard from you...

 

agree. I would be willing to bet any of the hillary supporters here any amount of money that trump will be in the debates.

 

So now it's a waste of time and money to even investigate criminal activity? And as far as "saving millions" the only way to do that would be to stop congress from meeting. They're going to spend their time on something after all. Personally, I think this is a better use of taxpayer funds than bringing fellow legislators on the "Lolita Express".
https://www.rt.com/usa/343048-clinton-epstein-lolita-express/

 

That Would appear to be an a rather self defeating place for a Republican to go since Sam Walton union buster was a Republican.

 

As evidenced by Hillary nabbing recent former Republican donors, union busting is something both parties and the media can all get behind.

Also just throwing this out there, but people that voted for Clinton originally over Perot are huge idiots. Perot stated pretty clearly that if we didn't repeal NAFTA that jobs would start pouring out of our country. Now here we are almost 15 years later, and it looks like Perot was right, wages have flat-lined, and there are barely any jobs left in our country. Why in the hell are we even talking about electing anyone remotely associated with NAFTA?

 

You're a bit off the tracks there, aren't you? First, I think you mean investigating "suspected" criminal activity. Investigation after investigation led by Republicans have conceded that there was no criminal activity or even carelessness on Clinton's part regarding Benghazi. The blame, if any, belongs to the security "experts."

As to the "Lolita Express," that has been debunked so often and so thoroughly that anyone who still brings it up is completely out of touch with reality.

Have you ever considered using facts in your post instead of invented stories that have been disproved? Sticking to the facts could even appeal to reasonable people and not just to the whack-jobs who will believe anything that confirms their political prejudices.

 

Nope, Trump will run away from the debate stage. He knows he'll look like an idiot in a one on one with Hillary Clinton.

And if Clinton's poll numbers hold, she won't have any trouble getting under his very thin skin.

 

Debunked Eh? Only on MSNBC. Here, I love this quote from the Daily Mail:
Bill Clinton spent enough time aboard disgraced Wall Street mogul Jeffrey Epstein's 'Lolita Express' airplane that he should be eligible for frequent flyer miles, according to a shocking new report that reveals how often the former U.S. president road along with with the convicted sex offender.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-26-TIMES-just-three-years.html#ixzz4GaS9q9ul

 

The Daily Mail is a scandal sheet, not a newspaper.

 

Whatever. Things have moved fast and Trump's numbers are down in Pennsylvania. I doubt trump can afford to skip debates.

 

Oh... isn't that a guy Trump hung out with? Was that back in 1980 something? Would not be when Bill was President and .....fails to implicate Hillary.

PLENTY of sources cited that lack much cred.