Goodness Christ, is this segment a Neo-Con's wet dream? This is why Stein or Johnson needs to be on the debate stage. There's no one there to represent "non-intervention"... It's all how much we'll intervene in the middle east, not actually questioning if we should be there at all.
Amen.....not sure about trump, but Clinton would have us in a deeper war asap. Can we just focus on economic victory?
given how much obama has done by executive order in his term (not the number of orders but their impact) what makes you think this is any barrier to him?
Ok cowfart...whatever floats your boat. I notice you still have not commented on anything other than me.
Why not? In Trump's world building a wall will keep all the Mexicans out of the U.S. and raising prices on Chinese imports will bring jobs back to America. Whooppeeee!
it really wouldnt If you look at US military history we do really really well in the war part. Look at the first part of iraq. We go in smash stuff up and kill the other guy. We do a lot lot worse when we have to hold the country down after killing the bad guys. If we had a war with iran we would not stay after its done.
Considering that his solution to Syria, was significantly better than the other candidates of course he does. When he states our attempt at nation building and intervening in countries hasn't work, and just makes terrorism worse, he's 100% accurate.