New CNN Poll Shows 50% of Americans Support Removing Trump From Office

Pass on the advice and let's see it then.

After all, currently the Trump administration is fighting tooth and nail to keep a report which totally exonerates him a classified secret when they can unilaterally release that information.

 

Most of us still remember 2016.

 

I doubt 50% of Americans are filled with 'hatred' for the President. In fact there is a groundswell of support from a previously predicted source. https://bongino.com/polls-show-34-percent-of-black-likely-voters-approve-of-trump-presidency/

 

I didn't claim that it did per se, I simply am of the thought that if the DOJ thought it material to the public inquiry of the Mueller Report, it would have released it.

 

That's not a crime.

 

You made that up.

You sound like Adam Schiff. Composing your own version of events.

 

Judge Sullivan might very well render the entire DC Grand Jury proceeding as being fruit from a poison tree.

In any event, the Grand Jury never rendered an indictment of Trump. The whole can of worms would put Weissman in more jeopardy than Trump.

 

Those results are supported by the Reuters/Ipsos poll results.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ngressional-hearings-poll-shows-idUSKBN1Y02MO

Since those INCREASES in support for impeachment are outside the MoE it is clear that the public hearings did their job when it comes to educating the electorate about the High Crimes of the BLOTUS and his cronies.

 

That doesn't appear to always be the case. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/why-2016-election-polls-missed-their-mark/

 

I just read this report on a perfect example of something that remains classified, does not pertain to trump, but members of Congress should want to know about.

Apparently, the DOJ just issued a flat denial to a 60 minutes FOIA request to identify a "congressional nominee" who attempted to contact Guccifer 2.0 in order to obtain the Hillary Clinton emails. That individual, who remains anonymous, might be a congressman now or might run for office in the future. Congress should want to know that information, right?

And I get that specific story has nothing to do with Trump or Ukraine, but you must keep in mind that the request for the mueller documents is broader and has been going on longer than the impeachment inquiry. It just so happens that Congress has expanded authorization when it is pursuing an impeachment inquiry.

 

I am of the thought that I don't trust Barr to place the interests of the public over that of the executive.

 

Do you remember 2018?

 

I did not.

Trump gave an interview to Fox and Friends last week. During that interview, he directly linked his decision to hold up military aid to the Crowdstrike investigation.

Trump also called for China to investigate his domestic political opponents while standing on the lawn of the white house.

 

You do not understand that legal concept.
Full stop.

 

That is an understatement.

Barr is BETRAYING his Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution and the Law of the Land.

Apparently the BLOTUS is a supreme dictator who can, and does, break whatever laws he wants to without anyone giving him guidance. If anyone deserves to be disBARRed it is him.

 

Don't kid yourself. We want the whole process - trial and all - to be complete prior to the week before election day.

 

You seem to think Barr is Trump's personal lawyer. He isn't. He doesn't give legal advice to the President. He runs the justice department.

 

Barr is BEHAVING like your BLOTUS's personal lawyer which is why he deserves to be disBARRed IMO.

 

I guess I'm not as good analyzing behavior as you are.

 

I think most Americans don't know or understand what Trump, Manafort, Perry etc were trying to do to Naftagaz.

 

Your own BLOTUS considers Barr to be his personal lawyer based upon the text of the Ukraine phone call.

Barr nefariously rewrote the findings of the Mueller report to benefit his client, the BLOTUS.

Barr has INTERVENED on behalf of your BLOTUS's personal tax returns.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/bill-...o-become-his-impeachment-scapegoat?ref=scroll

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...e-william-barr-serves-only-donald-ncna1062521

https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...-personal-lawyer-attorney-general-2019-9?IR=T

 

A lot of work to respond to a post that said nothing meaningful.

 

Kneejerk denialism does not alter factually documented reality.

 

Factually documented reality is subject to interpretation. Have you forgotten that this stuff is policis?

 

If that is all you have to cling to now that says volumes.