The Authoritarians Can Stuff It: New SoCal school board bans CRT on day one

I mean those who think they know more than the people who have dedicated years of their life to studying the issue.

 

Not true.

Read the link before commenting.

 

If your link proves a point you have to make, you'd include the copy/paste with the link proving your point.

And all you provided was 1 person's opinion.

 

Yeah, them. The ones who think a man can be a woman.

 

So you didn't read it. This guy's opinion is informed, yours ignorant.

 

As is yours.
Opinions mean nothing except to the person making it and those gullible enough to believe it.

Proof is much better for making a case.

 

Which the link link provides. Which makes my position a fact

 

No it doesn't. Don't besmirch the name of common sense like that

 

I've already explained to you that any and all of the race based guilt punishment oppressor, victim equity inclusion bs is all under the umbrella of CRT.

Downstream of the course taught in law school. Nobody cares if you can't figure that out. But down be surprised as we keep fighting to get this **** removed from schools.

So stay confused in the corner and let the adults/parents figure this out. They have stake in the game. You don't.

 

All you're doing is showing ignorance of both current reality and history. I'm tired of doing everyone's homework for them. So I'll provide one link and one video, the rest is entirely on YOU to educate yourself. I'm not going to spoon feed you every single little detail just because you want to argue and ignore. Though I'm not sure why I'm providing links, you've already proven that you won't read it unless someone cherry picks out of an entire article and quotes a specific part for you so that you can cherry pick that small part while ignoring everything else said.

LINK: William Ellison - Wikipedia

 

LOL, you even admitted the link is 1 professors opinion.
Which makes it NOT a fact.

 

Just because you told me doesn't make it fact. You need more than your opinion to make something fact.
Do you feel guilty? I don't.
You keep removing this from schools, it is easy, since it's not in primary schools.

There's nothing for me to be confused about. I don't share your opinion because your opinion is based on boogey man partisan nonsense.

 

What are you trying to prove.
A few blacks in USA owned other blacks? So what? I never said anything different.

All your doing is harping about a few out of thousands trying to justify slavery in USA.

And you are correct. I am not going to watch an entire video or read through an entire link/story to try and figure out what little tidbit one is trying to make.
If you have a point from a link, point it out.
People should not have to guess what you are trying to say, just say it and show it.


I've read enough links from people who claim it makes proof of a point, only to find it doesn't exist in the link.
So I won't waste time searching for something that may not exist.
It's the claimants job to show the point in the link that makes their case.

But it doesn't matter in this case. I don't know why you're trying to prove to me a few blacks in USA owned slaves.
That has nothing at all to do with this CRT nonsense in primary education.

 

I've already said my point. And if you're not going to bother educating yourself and not use logic then I have no desire to continue.

 

Your point is irrelevant to CRT in primary education in schools.
So what if 1 or 2 black people owned slaves. Not a thing to do with CRT.

So, what is the purpose of your point?

 

Educate yourself first. Then we can talk. Far more than 1 or 2 blacks owned slaves. Until you educate yourself, there's no point in talking to you.

 

I am educated, they have no bearing on CRT.
CRT is not a primary education curriculum.

Why don't you try to educate yourself?

 

I'm explaining it too you as it's being used when people on the right are looking to stop CRT in schools. If you are blinders on because its not the exact course from law school...then that's a you problem.

But at the end of the day, when these complaints are popping up and we call it 'CRT' because it's absolutely downstream from CRT...that's why. You can declare "nothing burger" but again, there are too many links videos and discussions of both parents and administration alike that highlight this problem as to how race is being handled now in our schools.

And nobody cares if you or anyone else wants to turn a blind eye on it or scoff because you think it's not CRT.

 

Again, people are looking to stop CRT in schools when it does NOT exist in primary education schools.
It's a solution to a problem that isn't real. Silly, but go ahead and do it.

The CRT crowd got inflamed from RW boogeyman nonsense. It worked not doubt. That's why I also called it a political football. And it was effective. But it's a solution to a non existent issue.

I call it NOT CRT because it's NOT CRT.

 

It's not a boogeyman since all this race based nonsense has been confirmed. By both students parents and teachers. I don't care that you refuse to call it CRT. For some asinine reason, you seem to think CRT is limited only to the law school course. It is not. It's a theory based on race based principles of which all these examples are related to.

It's not a boogeyman. It's a problem and we are going to our a stop to this bullshit because you won't.

 

CRT isn't history it's bunkum. And worse. It's one very few things I've ever seen produced by educrats in which everybody loses.

 

I posted the following to @yardmeat but he never responded to it, in fact he ran from the thread and never came back. Perhaps you can have a go at it...

Perhaps you can explain why the Detroit Public Schools Superintendent Nikolai Vitti admits to using it as shown in post 43. Perhaps you can also explain why LibsofTikTok keeps posting teachers admitting to using it. Or perhaps you can explain why the National Education Association passed a resolution saying that its "reasonable and appropriate" to include CRT in curriculum and pledged to create a team of staffers to help teachers "fight back against anti-CRT rhetoric"? LINK: Teachers union vows to 'fight back' against Critical Race Theory critics (nypost.com)

You can continue to deny if you wish. But when you have school Superintendents, teachers, and the largest teachers union in the country all outright admitting to using CRT in their curriculum's then all you're doing is eating the sand that you've buried your head in.

 

You want to stop history? Good luck with that.

 

This paragraph is in your linked article to the NEA.

...
To boost the effort, the NEA will work to publicize “an already-created, in-depth study that critiques white supremacy, anti-Blackness, anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy … capitalism … and other forms of power and oppression,” according to the NEA site.
...

Can you find it on the NEA website?
I did a quick look and did not see those words. Even if they are there, that's not CRT.

 

Talk about the forest through the trees. Are you trying to tell me that you know more about what CRT is than the NEA? Why would they need to create a team to "fight back against anti-CRT rhetoric" if they are not using it? Additionally, you cherry pick one sentence while completely ignoring the very next sentence... "“We oppose attempts to ban critical race theory and/or The 1619 Project,” the NEA said." Again, why would they oppose attempts to ban CRT or the 1619 Project which the author of which said is based on CRT....if its not being taught? (btw, the 1619 Project IS being taught in over 4,000 schools. Despite several REAL academics pointing out that it is not an accurate account of history)

I'll also note that you couldn't answer either of the other instances I noted.