Dear Illegal Immigrants...

I DID NOT MENTI0N RACE WHEN I SAID POOR WOMEN.
You did
It was racist to do so.
Got it?
The rest of your post is a completely tangential distraction from that massive reveal you fell into.

 

where are the democrat politicians, when it comes to the little girls that get raped, whilst on the journey up to America? what about the children?

 

We are of course in a time where intentional confusion, deception and misdirection is rampant- not a time of honesty or good faith. The objective would appear to be that of weakening people by making them unsure of what to believe, and what words really mean.... doubting themselves; and the only rational reason to do that to people is to reduce their ability to resist corrupt power. We have people in high positions telling us that don't know what a woman is- and the actions they are taking tell us they don't want us to know either. This is dangerous stuff.

One of the key tools is this misuse of language, confusing your understanding of your own thoughts. You must know what words mean- and use the right ones, both in you mind and in your statements, so your understanding and communication is clear.

Let's take a look at the work "Immigrant". Generally, a person who leaves one country, to become a permanent resident of another. Permanence of course means that he assimilates, becomes one of the citizens, adopts the values and systems of his new nation. Otherwise- he is at best a colonist, or a squatter as they used to say- someone present only to gain, not to contribute.

Another way of looking at this is simple terms is when a hunter goes to see the owner of land, and asks permission to enter and hunt on that land- That makes his presence and actions righteous, he has approval and consent. However, if that hunter simply jumps the fence, enters the property and hunts anyway- the right words are trespasser and poacher.

This is the difference between true migrants who ask permission, and the illegals who jump the fence. They are POACHERS, not immigrants.
I've decided to make that correction in my own vocabulary in identifying such people; they are not deserving to be known as immigrants, to do so legitimizes the illegality of their presence.
They are- Poachers, entering secretly, preying on the assets of a place they have not been invited to.

We might want to correct a number of the terms we use in todays word-circus, to stop legitimizing fundamentally wrongful conduct and the people who promote it.

 

very well put.

I think that laura ingrham is too full of herself, and a brat. But occasionally, after sometimes watching hannity, when she comes on, she can make some good talking points.
She was hosted an episode talking about that very thing. How illegals that come over, are being taught to expect handouts, and more importantly not that they need to assimilate to our customs, but yet, for some reason, that we should assimilate to theirs, and their languages, etc.

Only Democrat Politicians in America, could be so sick as to sell their own people out that much as the traitors that they're!

 

Drivel.

 

I said they were Mexican Citizens. They swore allegiance to Mexico when they acquired their land.

 

So Cubans who came here by boat to escape Fidel Castro are all illegals because they jumped the fence?

We have the 1980 Cubans Adjustment Act. We have 8 USC 1158 that defines when, how, and to what extent asylees/refugees can apply, which means any time and to any degree, whether here or abroad. We have Temporary Protective Status, a new law in 1990 as a compromise between hard-line immigration restrictionists and social conservatives. The point is, whether a person is "illegal" or not depends on facts and circumstances. Migrants, if they have a prima facie case of an asylee/refugee case. Some do and some don't. Thus, your terms are not precise enough.

The other point there is a difference between an EWI, which you are referring to as "jumping the fence" but that is not entirely accurate given our laws for refugee/asylee laws have, read the Central American migrants during the battle between the Sandinistas and the Contra Rebels who were peddling, via the CIA, drugs into the country.

The legal term is out of status and based on why they are out of status, or illegal, will depend on if they can adjust status or not. Adjusting status does not always mean staying in their country of origin for the paperwork comes through. For some, that is the case, such as Fiance or spousal visa, but for some, it is not the case.

 

So what. In human relations, might makes right. It has always been this way and it will always be that way. The only reason that America is openly transing kids without fear of consequence is because the people with the guns say it is ok. The ONLY reason why it is ok in America to openly talk about eradicating whiteness is because the people with the guns say it is ok. The one thing that CRT radicals appear to have gotten right is their insistence that everything comes from power. They may not be wrong on that count. That is why the next century most likely will have Chinese morality and Western morality will most likely fall. We are in severe decline with the test scores of American students at or very near 3rd world levels. You cannot compete on a global scale with a nation filled to the brim with low IQ people. This will become more clear in a decade as they accelerate the mass offshoring of engineering. I see South Africa as the future for America. Hopefully that won't be for another fifty years.

 

Oh really? Might makes right and may God defend the right. If you and I were to stand across over 20 paces with big irons on our hips, who do you think will win that battle? You or me? Do you really think God will be on your side that day? As a civilized society, our country has made mistakes, some very bad, but we must also acknowledge those mistakes, not bury them whether it is slavery with our founding fathers or the Trail of Tears and other native American treaties we have signed or whatever. We can teach math, social studies, history, science, and any other core educational course without politics. Does it really matter to ban Anne Franks's Diary because it talks about a "girl's self-discovery" about her body in the midst of Nazi Occupied Netherlands? Or are we missing the true value of what her Diary is about? Or how about Huckleberry Finn? Are we truly missing the value of that book because some say it uses a derogatory remark in today's terms but not when the book was written?

Education today, especially primary and secondary education, is a "check the box" sort of thing. Teachers teach to the test whether it is with ASCI or the state exam. Some schools get by simply by prestige, especially some private preparatory schools in the NE and upper Midwest. Our biggest problem is that we think every kid is college-bound and making high school that way, generally. Most civilized countries have a three-tier system of high school from Germany to the UK to Japan. At least, they teach education, while we, teach about how to feel good about what the other guy is thinking, read Flodia HB 1557 and HB 7.

Second, the United States has never been #1 in education since 1992, the last time we were ranked #1. Since then we have continued to drop because education has become political. In 2009, we were ranked #18 out of 38 industrialized countries. In other words, "complacency and inefficiency, reflective of lower priorities in education, and inconsistencies among the various school systems contributed to a decline."


https://www.historynet.com/was-the-usa-ever-no-1-in-education/

https://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93442.pdf

 

As far as I know , no American politician has any legal jurisdiction outside the US.

 

A couple of things.
I am not sure about the three tiered thing in the UK. Your description of US education is pretty similar to that in the UK, though there has been an increase in apprentiships recently.

The highest scoring countries in the world for student attainment are those countries which do indeed teach to exams. ie China, South Korea and Singapore etc.
They use a lot or rote learning, absorption and regurgitation.
I really don't know how much personal reasoning and the ability to debate is included in for example PISA scores..
Personally I think those abilities are fundamentally important. They allow you to question your world. IMO it is more important than complex mathematical skills.

 

yeah, it's interesting how dems want illegals fleeing socialism, communism, oppression in order to get their vote to implement the same system the illegals are fleeing.

 

would you care to elaborate more?

 

It's just to bad, that all of the Democrats in America, just couldn't have to house, and take care of financially, every illegal immigrant that crosses the border.

It would solve a lot of problems. Wait, I take that back, cause then, they'd do what they do now anyways. Any democrat with money, simply just doesn't live by a bunch of illegals.

So they simply don't care.

example, martha's vinyard. They say that they love everyone, including illegals, but when a couple gets shipped there, all heck breaks loose, because they can't have those type of people in their rich community. now can they? lmao!

If Republicans are going to ship these illegals anywhere, they should only be shipping them to places like Martha's Vinyard, and other Rich high class Liberal owned houses areas. Then have the news cover it, and see how "accepting" the liberal politicians really are of illegals? Because they're not! they're full of crap! lmao.

 

Moving people against their will is kidnapping.

 

it's hard to trust anyone now adays. Democrat Politicians have made it that way for a reason. it helps people panic easier, and it helps their Communist dictator Anarchist Agenda.

 

Democrat Politicians have made it very clear, that they could care less about a border, and protecting the American citizens from anyone dangerous that comes from other countries. Terrorists, rapists, Murderers, Drug Cartels, Human Sex Trafficking! They love it all! It's all crime, and they love it all!!! It's party of their Woke pc, Anarchist Agenda!!!

 

Have you tried yoga or meditation?

 

you should by now have begun to understand the law in the US. That’s miles from being correct.

 

It isn't a matter of law.
It is a matter of the meaning of words.
If I contained you using a weapon and forced you into a vehicle and took you somewhere you didn't want to hold, that is kidnapping.
These people are not prisoners, nor have they been found guilty of anything. They are waiting for their appeal for asylum to be heard.
Even the mighty USA should follow the international law they signed up to.
Read the 1951/67 United Nations convention on Refugees.
Once they are found to be guilty of something, they can then be moved under custody .
Any questions?

 

I bet you have. LIberals love those sort of things. uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I'm done different forms of meditation, but I'm guessing they're different than what most liberals do.