The mind-blowing evil of slicing off young girls’ breasts.

Sure, then we would have an objective tests for transgenderism. Right now girls are being groomed into transgenderism.

 

I've already proven that top surgery removes more than just adipose tissue; it removes the parts that produce milk.

Per the Gender Confirmation Center--not exactly a right-wing group--those who undergo top surgery will more than likely not be able to breast feed. Therefore, it is not as simple as removing fat; they are removing the organs of the breasts:

"
The glands and ducts responsible for milk production will be removed from your body during surgery. This means that you will no longer be able to produce milk. There may be a small amount of glandular tissue left behind, but this will not be enough to produce milk.
"

As to this first point about the preservation of the nipple and areola. That is not always the case. Per the Mayo Clinic, "If your chest size is small, you might be able to have surgery that spares your skin, nipple and areola." In other words, the nipple and the areola MIGHT be preserved IF the girl's chest size is small. Notice how those CONDITIONS widely are different from your blanket statement that the nipple and areola are preserved.

 

No, I wouldn't. I would still want the child to give meaningful consent to a surgery altering their body permanently.

 

But the child cannot give meaningful consent, as they don't have sufficient mental hardwiring to do so.

 

Yes, so I would not do the surgery until they are old enough to understand what is going on and can consent.

 

Exactly. They confuse these young girls, groom them to the operating table, slice off their breasts and likely remove their ability to ever nurse their young.

It is the most grotesque attack on young girls, and womanhood, that I have ever seen, and being perpetuated by groups in our society that we are in the habit of granting a great deal of trust.

 

nobody told bill clinton about this, did they? He went to underage sex island and raped plenty of underaged girls.

What i meant to say is that he flew over the island 35 times, but never landed. His words, not mine.

Just like he never paid of women that he's raped. And hillary never shamed women that bill raped for power.
and hillary and bill have a happy marriage. And bill didn't have sexual relatins with that woman.

and even if all of this is true, and not a lie, do democrat voters really care anyways?

 

I'm unclear on what Democrat voters care about, I do assume that the vast majority do NOT support slicing perfectly healthy breasts off young girls who have been caught up in a fad.

 

Medical Mutilation For Profit. ALWAYS JUST ONE MORE SURGERY AWAY FROM FINDING HAPPINESS: ‘Shoulder Width Reduction Surgery’: The Latest ‘Transgender’ Aesthetic Mutilation Fad.



Very profitable for "The Cutters".

 

Don't be so sure about that.

Most Dems are pretty far gone.

 

Sweden Ditches Barbaric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care Mutilation for Kids.



'Sweden’s treatment guidelines for youth with gender dysphoria say that the first line of treatment should be psychosocial support rather than giving kids dangerous drugs to stop puberty or mutilating their bodies.'

Yes. A problem between the ears is not solved by slicing between the arms and legs.

“the risks of puberty suppressing treatment with GnRH-analogues and gender-affirming hormonal treatment currently outweigh the possible benefits, and that the treatments should be offered only in exceptional cases.”

They are focused on 'gender dysphoria rather than gender identity' when determining 'access to care and treatment.”

“Psychosocial support that helps the young person live with the body’s pubertal development without medication needs to be the first option when choosing care measures.”

Yes.

'Gender dysphoria is a psychological problem that requires psychological intervention' not a mad rush 'to mutilate children without any psychological intervention first.'

The knowledge that 'gender confirming treatment may lead to a deteriorating of health and quality of life (i.e. harm), is important for the overall judgment and recommendation.”

 

Maybe the 'progressives' have returned to their Eugenic Roots with this destruction of the reproductive capacity of these young?

'HE SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD: Dem official denounced for complaining of school budget costs for disabled children who weren’t aborted. Always with their eugenics obsession.'


'Hugo’s peers were shocked to hear his comments, insinuating a child with disabilities should be aborted to avoid being a burden to the school’s budget.'

 

And of course Republicans provide so much funding for children whether or not they are disabled and they do not even hide that fact

 

then I guess Circumcision is "cutting off part of the penis"?

and in most cases this is done with no input from the male, other than maybe some screams after the fact

 

The new cult-sacrifice to the trans-cult, the breasts of young girls.

Girl sues hospital for removing breasts at age 13

Social Contagion -> Online Grooming -> Got her breasts sliced off by greedy doctors -> A lifetime of regret in a body mutilated by the Medical Gender Conversion Industry.

'A lawsuit in California is drawing even more attention to the ongoing social contagion of transgender ideology. The story of Layla Jane is, sadly, an all too familiar horror show that played out when she was at her most vulnerable. Jane was just eleven years old and already exhibiting symptoms of other mental and emotional challenges when she was somehow convinced that she was a boy “in the wrong body.” Only two years later, at the age of 13, she had been pushed fully into “transition” and wound up having a mastectomy. Now she is 18 and she is suing all of the doctors involved, as well as the hospital, for ruining her body and failing to provide her with the mental health care she clearly required. (The Epoch Times)'

'The defendants carried out “ideological and profit driven medical abuse” when they prescribed her puberty blockers and hormones and, later, performed a double mastectomy, Charles Limandri, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiff, Layla Jane, said in a statement.'

'Jane, now 18, was influenced by people online when she was just 11 and told her parents that she was a boy, prompting them to ask for guidance from doctors.'

THREE REPUTABLE DOCTORS DID THE RIGHT THING, THEN THEY FOUND THE GREEDY QUACKS

'The details of Layla Jane’s experience are truly horrifying. Upon learning of their daughter’s gender confusion, Jane’s parents took her to three different doctors, including Dr. Doreen Samelson (who is not named in the suit). All three of them told the family that they could not prescribe hormones or puberty blockers for Layla because of her young age and other emotional issues. They instead recommended counseling and therapy. But Layla was then taken to more trans-friendly doctors.

• 75 minutes later she is on testosterone and puberty blockers.
• Later, 'after a 30-minute appointment with a plastic surgeon named Dr. Winnie Tong resulted in approval for Layla to undergo a mastectomy.'
• A few months after than, her breasts are in the trash can, and the quacks are depositing the proceeds, and looking for the next group of confused young girls to disfigure.

'Now, at 18 years of age, Layla Jane is undergoing lengthy emotional and mental health counseling. This is precisely the sort of treatment she desperately needed but was never offered as a child. She was a child of eleven and her parents are not doctors. There were relying on the supposed expertise of the medical professionals they were directed to see.'

The high pressure tactics by these dreadful deforming quacks include threatening the parents with their child's suicide "you can either have a live son or a dead daughter" or something along those lines.

'We’re talking about the irreversible mutilation of children and experiments with risky drugs that were never approved for these purposes by the FDA. These procedures are being banned for underage patients all across Europe, but here in the United States, we have people that continue to double down. It needs to end.'

Layla Jane’s body (along with much of her life) has been ruined. But she is brave enough to tell her story and potentially help others being lured onto this horrible path. And if we can’t manage to have the doctors who are engaging in these abusive practices thrown in jail, perhaps bankrupting a few of them will start to get the message across. I wish Ms. Jane the best on her journey along with a full and rapid recovery, as much as that’s possible.'

Well stated, if we can't jail them, bankrupt them, at least make them uninsurable.

 

Can't have that ... they may change their minds.