I wonder if the atrocities directed against unarmed Israeli civilians

You think I was talking about you? There are plenty of gun owners who dont know much about their firearms.

 

and there are plenty of IDF soldiers who aren't particularly good shots. The Israeli domestically created weapons were lauded for being very good for somewhat trained combatants who weren't going to spend a lot of effort caring for their weapons. I bet there are more seriously good shooters in the states of Ohio, Indiana and Michigan than all of Israel.

 

I assume you know your AR inside and out, yes?

 

The 9th Amendment doesn't say anything about unenumerated rights.

 

The average gun owner in The United States has way more than three years of firearms training.

 

Wonder why we dont allow people behind the wheel based on the same mentalities? The average citizen is a good driver, so why not just abolish the whole drivers license shenanigan requirement?

 

Do you understand that the constitution gives congress no legislative power to restrict gun ownership?

 

Because requiring driver's licenses is a strategy used to control the populace. It doesn't have anything to do with making sure people are qualified...lol.

 

Arms ownership, the word gun is nowhere in the constitution...my car is a weapon.

 

A dinner fork is a weapon, by that logic. You sure you want to make that argument?

 

So do you understand that congress has only a limited legislative authority? A yes or no will suffice as an answer.

 

No disagreement from me.
An ex of mine would love to just be able to be rid of that whole mandated blow and go business that disables her vehicle.

Yea why not, I have a right to carry dinner forks with me and not pay an extra tax to do so right?

 

If that means you dont disagree with me then yea.

 

So do you understand that congress has only a limited legislative authority? You're saying that you agree with that?

 

Continue....

 

Continue? What does that even mean?

So do you understand that congress has only a limited legislative authority? You're saying that you agree with that?

 

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

"The right there specified is that of 'bearing arms for a lawful purpose.' This is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence."

US v Cruikshank

 

Im not arguing, so please continue. I wanna see where this leads.

 

Exactly as I said: the 9th Amendment says nothing about"unenumerated " rights.

What the 9th Amendment means, is that your right to fill in the blank doesn't Trump my rights.

An example: your property rights don't Trump my 2A rights, if you are open to the general public.

 

the concept of constitutional rights seems foreign to you. and you don't need a license to own a car or use it on private property

 

You think we might have the same ex?...lol

 

I beg to differ. Let someone come here in rural Southwest Florida and just try to attack some little neighborhood out in the sticks and see what kind of armed response they will get.

Pretty much it's true about try that in a small town. Over 400 million guns in the United States and the people who live out in the country and in small towns tend to own a very large number of them relative to their population

 

Well, it'll go different ways based upon your answer.

So do you understand that congress has only a limited legislative authority?

 

No, can you explain?

 

You want me to explain the constitution to you?

This is a political forum, right?