I wonder if the atrocities directed against unarmed Israeli civilians

Your interpretation.

 

So the question is where in the constitution congress has any legislative authority to ban guns. I don't see any such language, do you?

 

I dont think they have the authority to continue the war on drugs either. So no, i dont see such language.

 

So we'd agree that the federal assualt weapons ban of 1994 was unconstitutional?

 

good analysis-the only difference is smoking herb is not constitutionally protected specifically, its more of a tenth amendment issue

 

Cats outta the bag with that one. I agree with precedent, but the challenge of unconstitutional was defeated i heard.

 

Not sure what you're saying. Do we agree that the federal assault weapons ban of 1994 was unconstitutional?

 

I think so?
Especially if it leads to ending the unconstitutional war on drugs. Can we use the same precedent is my question now considering assault weapon, or the word gun isnt in the constitution.

 

neither is Christianity or Judaism but both are protected by the first amendment

 

War on drugs is also in violation of the constitution.

But we agree that the federal assualt weapons ban was also in violation of the constitution?

 

Then we do.

 

Very terse. Do we agree that the federal assualt weapons ban was in violation of the constitution?

 

What in your interpretation cant be considered "arms"?
In my opinion its anything that can be used as a weapon.

 

Terse? Now there's a new word.
Yes. After witnessing Russias hostilities once a nation gives up its nukes, im fully on board with the right to bear arms.

 

So why would the 1994 assualt weapons ban violate the constitution?

 

Because arms applies to pretty much everything.

 

The 1994 federal assault weapons ban is unconstitutional because...

Fill in the blank.

 

the second amendment refers to arms that citizens keep and bear.

 

So what doesn't count as a "arms"

 

I just did.
Its unconstitutional because an assault weapon is "arms". Anything can be considered arms.

 

Arms? I'm not sure I follow.

Does congress have any legislative authority at all to institute an assault weapons ban?

 

Right to bear arms.
They cannot ban anything that can be considered arms. If I weaponize something, congress has no legislative authority to ban it.

 

Do you understand that congress only has the legislative powers granted to it?

 

for SECOND AMENDMENT PURPOSES --Nukes, anthrax, napalm bombs, dildos, Guillotines, MOABS, Triple A batteries, cruise missiles, 105 smoothbore guns, Torpedoes, depth charges, 16 inch naval cannon, etc

 

Where does that list come from?
How about a pressurized can of fetanyl mix like pepper spray? Or a molded Cocaine shiv?