Lesbians Commit Child Abuse With Doctors' Blessings

I'm not familiar with Jesus camps, I never realized they involved pumping kids full of drugs. So which of these camps injected kids with drugs?

 

This had nothing to do with the right or the left. The thread was out of control and over half of the posts in there violated the TOS of the forum in some cases multiple times.

 

Nice dodge:

Care to answer the question now?

 

The lesbians started advocating (influencing the child) at 3

 

What silliness, as if the testosterone of puberty would cause one to want to mutilate their male genitals,LOLOL!!! No, its to prevent testosterone from interfering with his choice to mutilate his genitals.

 

Just being a lesbian is, for a child's sake = to "being against males".

Think about it. Imagine a woman who refuses to have sex with a man and only uses a man's sperm to create you. In all other regards a man to her is useless as tits on a boar hog. [old farm expression]. So you're a boy and your mother has forsaken all men and all things male [except her female sexual partner who is parading around as a male, or your mom is, or whatever role-playing butch/femme arrangement they have going]. So really you're only example of 'being male", modeled for you is "being a woman [female] and acting more bullish than other females".

So one day you look between your legs and you realize "I'm a male". I mean, it really hits you for the first time. This occurs around the age of 3 actually..depending on the individual child. By 3, kids are far more aware of the world than most give them credit for. After all, for the preceding years they've been mostly observing, cataloging, sorting, analyizing their world. So by 3 you look between your legs and realize you're a male and then it hits you....The center of your world and reason for being [at that age], your very own mother, rejects "male" so much that she takes to her bed another woman and one of them "acts the male" but won't have anything to do with them.

Very quickly, to avoid rejection, you might analyze, catalog and sort that if you continue on the path to outright maleness [beard, lower voice, bigger muscles, the whole nine yards], your very own mother will come to reject you.

Don't start thinking about higher reasoning right now. This is the mind of a child that is using its rudimentary reasoning to "figure out how not to fall from favor from the clan".

So then you as a little boy begin to say "momma, I really feel like a girl" "I want to be a girl".

And momma, being a lesbian and all about girls, probably wanting to have had a girl baby to begin with, in a culture that promotes mutilating children to suit their fanatasy world thrust on them by the world of adults, is thrilled to pieces to hear the news. "Johnny wants to be a girl! Let's log all this down and get him to a doctor before he starts puberty!"

Where are the child psychiatrists? Where are the police?

 

Does that mean that as a heterosexual male, I'm against males too? Are you against everyone you're not interested in having sex with? Are you against your own children or are you interested in having sex with them?

Maybe, just maybe, rational human beings are capable of seeing and expressing the worth of individuals without wanting to get in bed with them.

Of course, you may not consider lesbians as being rational (or indeed, human beings) but that would be a whole different issue.

 

Why would I respond to a red herring? Your comparison is completely irrelevant. Care to answer the question about which flavor of ice cream you prefer? That's equally applicable.

 

Oh please, what of single women who never marry? I had an aunt who raised her son by herself; she pretty much hated men, she never had men who weren’t related in the house. To my knowledge her son has never attempted to mutilate himself, and he’s straight and has a girlfriend at the moment.

Also, it says right on the article they “deliberated with family and psychiatrists.” They’re doing what’s in his best interest. What are the police going to do in order to help him? Locking his parents up is only going to make things worse, especially if he knows why they got locked up.

 

That was a one to one situation. Two powerful adults reinforcing the idea as a team is another story.

It's one thing to badmouth males incessently. You never know how many "transgender kids" may result from that...you didn't say.. But if a child SEES EVIDENCE that his gender is so despised or rejected at such a deep and visceral level that his own mother would try against the laws of nature to reproduce with another woman night after night instead of lying with a man in the same way, then he might internalize that deep and unmatchable rejection of his gender and wish to not be that gender his mother protests so completely, so viscerally and robustly against.

A man with a wife is not rejecting other males. He is simply attempting to reproduce with the correct gender. I highly doubt that the man goes on and on day after day representing his hatred of his own self/gender for the boy to hear and internalize.

See the difference? The heterosexual man is celebrating what men are for, reproductively/biologically speaking. The lesbian mother is rejecting what men are for reproductively/biologically speaking. And let me tell you this too. I've known quite a few lesbians in my travels and have heard their candid feelings about men in general, spoken liberally actually at nearly every opportunity that presents itself. The narrative goes like this, "men are good for one thing only: sperm. Otherwise we women have no need of them."

You say that enough around a little boy, laugh about it enough in your circles in front of him or outright preach it to him as some militant lesbians are very capable of, and that boy might feel like being a boy is going to wind up alienating himself from his own mother.

The Dr. from Johns Hopkins is right: this IS a mental issue and should be exhaustively suspected as such before a child is ever chemically altered under the age of consent to not be the gender he was born as..

 

Since you 'care' about children so much you should be just as mad about hundreds and hundreds of kids being brainwashed.

But you wont answer the question...no surprise, since you are a believer and do not want to be shown as a hypocrite.

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg52wBzwV8k&feature=related"]Sunday Night - Girls will be girls (Part 2 of 2) - YouTube[/ame]

The bad music at the very beignning lasts only 20 seconds

The one person who againts given kids horomone blockers is a Catholic...thats a surpirse

Best part of the video is from 4:50 on.

 

Why should it mean that?

Heterosexual men have their 'male bonding' w/their pals over fishing, sports, pool, etc - then go home to their wives/GF's... most of them are pretty well balanced in this way..... at least the ones I've known......

 

yes, but just keep your mitts off of 11 year olds

 

Not a problem here, Im gay not a pedophil!

PS: if you mean giving the hormone blocker to the 11 y/o, perhaps you shoud see the video I posted 2 pots back!!!

 

She shouldn't have been allowed to take hormones or have surgery to become a female! She is happy now, and she should be miserable, probably considering suicide! Her parents should have forced her to get over herself and suffer being someone she wasn't!!

Well, that's what some people think, anyway.

 

So what is the difference between two parents influencing a child to believe they are the opposite sex, and influencing a child to believe in a mythical being?
Influence is influence either way, after all...

 

Exactly my point. Lesbians can and do socialise with men (and women they're not in a relationship with) in exactly the same way as the rest of us do.

A woman being sexually and emotionally attracted to other women doesn't make them evil man-hating monsters who want to turn all little boys in to little girls.

 

Mak, its said that some people would rather have people like Kim suffer than be happy.

It makes you wounder if they are happy themselves.

 

that's comforting, a whack job who likes to spend his life commiserating with other mentally deficient individuals, evaluating the confused child of two fellow whack jobs, who is burdened with the task of trying to please his two mommies.

 

Hes happy now because her moms are letting him wear a dress and pretend he is a girl. Has nothing to do with taking hormones.

 

Who is Kim? And is there ANY evidence that gender reassignment makes transgendered people happy? John Hopkins closed their gender reassignment clinic after conducting "follow-up evaluations on as many of their former transsexual patients as possible. When the follow-ups were performed, they found that most of the patients stated that they were happy as members of their target sex, but that their overall level of psychological functioning had not improved."
These two moms pointed to the potential of suicide that is prevalent among transgendered people, but there is no evidence that the threat is any less for tansgenders who have gone through reassignment.

 

See Post #187

 

I think kids want to emulate their parents. This kid will likely have his gender reassigned so he can become a lesbian.

 

Some outraged over drug treatments for transgender child

This is consistent with other transgender kids.

It seems like the lesbian couple's 2 other sons do not have any transgender issues and they could see the little boy that began taking the hormones always identified as a female.

When would you like to start (and this goes for the rest of the right wingers here) looking at the facts, and stop thinking with the creatures of your mind?