http://www.isidewith.com/results/2110748 Lower than I thought (was thinking near 90%). Ron Paul (75%) I side the most with Ron Paul on issues of Foreign Policy and Immigration. R. Lee Wrights (61%) I do not side with R. Lee Wrights on any major issues. Rick Perry (60%) I do not side with Rick Perry on any major issues.
http://www.isidewith.com/results/2250191 I favor none. I am a true independent. At first I was 44% in favor of Ron Paul, but I was not being intellectually honest enough.
Romney 70% Santorum 70% Paul 50% Newt 49% You should have allowed multiple choices as I got a tie, so I selected Santorum. http://www.isidewith.com/results/2256726
I got 79% agreement with Johnson. He wasn't a poll option, so I selected Paul at 72% http://www.isidewith.com/results/2257524
The options for answers are quite general. Therefore, they can apply to a variety of the candidates. That is why answered all of them in my own words.
These things are typically worthless because it does not represent where these people really stand. They're liars. Maybe another century from now, people will realize it.
The options for answers are vague. Therefore, they can apply to various candidates. That is why I answered all of them in my own words.
Does this test represent 2008 Obama or 2011 Obama? Early 2000s Mittens or the new and improved conservative 2012 Mittens?
No it shows it is a false site. How come I have Santorum and Romney and yet I have not seen Gingrich on anybody. This is a scam at best
http://www.isidewith.com/results/2267590 I am 73% with Ron Paul (according to this survey). Interesting.
I don't think this site is accurate. It says that I agree 100% with Paul on science yet he's a creationist... I got 81% Paul 76% Johnson 62% R. Lee Wrights
http://www.isidewith.com/results/2287110 I side with Ron Paul more than anyone else, but this thing says Ron Paul believes in evolution... [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPoCsC8VT9g"]Ron Paul: Revolution minus Evolution is Just R(etarded) - YouTube[/ame] Ron Paul says he doesn't accept the theory... I could never vote for anyone that calls himself a Doctor and doesn't believe in evolution.
So if another Doctor runs for President that feels like you believe Paul does is in EVERY OTHER WAY BY FAR the best candidate for the job, in your opinion...you would still not vote for him. What a strange voter you are imo.
To each his own, I suppose. Everyone has their own issues that they consider absolute priorities, including me. Evolution (something that I am 100% convinced of) simply isn't a big deal to me, but who am I to tell someone else that their priority is wrong? *Edit* I don't see the issue of "evolution vs. creationism" anywhere in the oath of office or the Constitution. Just sayin'.
http://www.isidewith.com/results/2291442 I sided with three people I have never even heard of. Weird.
My point is that too many people vote for POTUS's for reasons that have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with running the country. What possible difference does it make whether a candidate believes in evolution or not? Can he change what happened? Will his believing one way or the other make ANY difference to anything? Will it reduce the budget? Protect America? Help the elderly? Fight crime better? PRIORITIES PEOPLE!!!!
Evolution is obvious to me. It happens. He probably does believe in evolution, but at that moment in time he was pandering. I live in Tennessee anyway. My vote won't count at all, this state is Red. If I went to the polls, I would still be voting against someone instead of for someone. I don't like the voting system and I think we should move toward an "alternative vote" system. It's just not enough to get me to the polls.