In a case being backed by a leading anti-racism group, a trial began in France on Friday in which the defendant stands accused of a racially-motivated attack on a white man in a Paris metro station. The trial of a 29-year-old accused of a racially motivated attack on a white man in a Paris metro station began at a court house in the French capital on Friday, in a legal case being backed by a leading anti-racism group. According to the prosecution, the accused man assaulted the victim after first using a string of racial slurs - including sale Français (dirty Frenchman) and sale blanc (dirty white). It is also alleged that he used a broken bottle as a weapon during the attack, which took place in 2010. While this is not the first accusation of incidents of so-called anti-white racism in France, this latest case is the first to have been backed by leading anti-racism group, The international league against racism and anti-Semitism (Licra), which is supporting the prosecution. "Insulted because he was white" In an interview with French radio station RFI, Licra vice-president Philippe Schmidt said he believes there was clearly a racial dimension to the attack. He was insulted because he was white," said Schmidt. Although only one suspect is standing trial, there were reportedly several others involved in the assault. "They came after him because of the colour of his skin," Schmidt commented. "The guy is white, the guy is French, and that's why they came after him." The notion of whites as the victims of racist abuse is not new in France, but remains highly controversial. http://www.france24.com/en/20130426-france-paris-anti-white-racism-trial-licra so it goes ....
Why should it be controversial? Because those laws were originally designed to punish whites ? Whites are the victims of minority violence far more often than the other way around, yet non-whites are rarely (if ever) prosecuted for racially motivated attacks. Amusing how the white man is always depicted as the oppressor in our history books, and in university sociology departments.
In Britain, white people are more likely to be victims of racist abuse than non-white people, yet the authorities only ever take a stand against racism whenever a non-white person is the victim.
In suburb, this is whites person wich are victims of racism, in the rich city or in they countrysides, the colored people... There's racism everywhere today in France, and more and more... It will be worsen with Hollande's politics wich don't do anything in order to solve the problem.
Hate speech laws in Europe should be applied to anyone who makes racist remarks in public places. A black woman was arrested in the UK last year for a racist rant on a bus and the offender's colour is irrelevant when it comes to hate crimes.
White people are receiving black-administered discipline and punishment from France to South Africa and all over the planet. Black people are justifiably seeking payback and revenge for present and past social injustices which they have suffered under white rule. Whenever whites are punished and disciplined by blacks, whites should not be angry, but consider it as personal sacrifices and contributions for the sake of of racial diversity and multiculturalism. The punishment will also be an opportunity for whites to repent and atone for their sins and feel better about themselves. Do you stand ready to make a sacrifice for diversity?
What a load of tosh. Maybe we should punish all German people because of the evils they committed in the 1940s? Maybe we should "discipline and punish" the people of Rome because of the Roman Empire? Maybe all Spaniards should be punished because of the atrocities their forefathers committed against the natives of South and Central America?
Unfortunately thats how many people see it. However we're becoming less and less Christian (turn the other cheek). 40+ thousands of years of warrior, from Vikings, Spartans, Franks, Romans, Crusaders and so on - that people think the can keep slapping away at that cheek and not awaken their worst nightmare.
White who are attacked are often as young as they where not born at the time of colonization... Why should they pay for something wich happened when they where not here? That's stupid...! I come from Lorren and I don't spend my time offend the German, and, when I met a German person of my age, I don't reject him because of his nationality... We can call that "racism", because they see somebody's color skin, and, if it's to white, they think that she's able to be offended because he come from a "nasty country"... And, all the countries in the word which are not extremely young does shameful thing. If you think like that, we must punnish everybody... Nice!
What's so suprising about that development? Turks, Kurds and many Sunni Arabs as well as negroes consider themselves as conquerors of the country. They see their presence similar to a military triumph and will continue to purge their new homelands from the natives or other "infidel" migrants.
