‘No!’: Anchor Chris Wallace Fiercely Pushes Back Against Democrat’s Clinton Email Cla

‘No!’: Anchor Chris Wallace Fiercely Pushes Back Against Democrat’s Clinton Email Claim During Tense Interview ​

By Curt
May, 29th, 2016

Jason Howerton:


“Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace pushed back forcefully when Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) compared Hillary Clinton’s use of private email to that of former Secretary of State Colin Powell.

“I do want to get back to the point that I wanted to finish…that is the comparison with Secretary Powell is—“ Schiff began.

“No! I’m sorry,” Wallace interrupted. “Hillary Clinton is running for president. Colin Powell is not running for president. The rules in 2004 were completely different. They’re completely different guidelines.”

Wallace said the guidelines about email use was repeatedly strengthened prior to Clinton’s time as secretary of state.

“Hillary Clinton was operating in a different world. Can we please stay to the issue of what Hillary Clinton did or didn’t do and not talk about Colin Powell?” the anchor added.

When Schiff tried to push back, Wallace claimed that Powell is “irrelevant” in the case of Clinton’s private email scandal.

Read--- http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ts-clinton-email-claim-during-tense-interview

(Excerpt)

Read more:
http://www.floppingaces.net/most-wa...s-clinton-email-claim-during-tense-interview/

The Progressive Socialist Left and their coconspirators the Lame Stream media are attempting to control the language to make it look like an Email Faux-Pas. This was a deliberate misuse of technology to use personal property to conduct government business.
As a recently retired Soldier of 26 years, a holder of a lowly “SECRET” Clearance, I am aware that any computer, phone, USB Drive or device of any type that I plug into a government computer, has immediately become government property. It should be unthinkable for any government petty functionary such as a “secretary of state” to even consider establishing a PRIVATE Email Server to conduct government business.
The infantile excuse that Colin Powell used his email account has no bearing on the felonious use of Hillary's Private Email Server. IMO, the fact that no one in the Lame Stream Media is demanding her head on a plate, or that no one is Congress is taking action to prevent Mrs. Clinton from running for POTUS (due to imprisonment) is unfathomable to me.

 

If Colin Powell or Condi Rice used private email, then investigate them. What Hillary has done shows her complete disregard for national security. This is secondary to her own personal considerations and THAT is an important consideration regarding a Presidential candidate. She disqualifies herself by her actions. Chris Wallace is no hard core right winger and even he has had it with these pathological pro Hillary liars. There is an old saying “Don’t p….s on my leg and tell me it’s raining”. That, however, is exactly what the Dems want us to accept each time they use their talking points in defense of Hillary's actions. I think they have finally run out of urine as it is no longer working. The investigation has shown she never had approval to run her own private server. The Obama administration is like Pontius and has completely washed their hands with this. Hillary has mocked the FBI with the whole wiping of the server with a towel comment. She is doomed. Sure, she has Democrats are out there still fighting for her on this issue. It is all futile. She never took her role as Secretary of State seriously. She was completely aloof in handling the sensitive materials. The FBI takes this very seriously. Just ask David Petraeus.

 

Heck, I'm just a school district employee and even I know that any school business conducted on my phone, home computer, personal email, etc, becomes district property and subject an FOIA request.

 

I fully agree, therefore Hillary is subject to Federal laws involving the handling of Classified, Secret and Top Secret. Something Hillary certainly failed to do.

 

I have no problem with Powell going to prison also.

 

The only problem is that Colin Powell used an Email system, he Did NOT create a private server, nor did he send and receive classified material. To the best of my knowledge he also did not instruct his aide(s) to alter classified material and have it sent similar to the message from Hillary to Jake Sullivan.

See:
Hillary Instructed Adviser To Strip Heading From Sensitive ...
https://lockerdome.com/dailycaller/8368036885313300
Hillary Instructed Adviser To Strip Heading From Sensitive Talking Points. On June 16, 2011, Hillary Clinton's top foreign policy adviser, Jake Sullivan, ...

 

Yawn and yawn (6 characters)

 

I am just saying that Hillary defenders use this excuse all the time and it's worthless.

 

Colin Powell did use private email and erased all the emails.

Rice did not use private email but here senior professional staff did. They have not responded to multiple inquiries made by the IG.

This was a systemic failure inside the Department of State not Hillary. The IG report confirms that.

- - - Updated - - -

Not worthless. The IG report confirms it and even goes as far to say that Hillary's use of private server is mitigated by the fact that she turned her emails over where Rice's staff won't respond to any questions and Colin Powell admitted he destroyed the emails.

- - - Updated - - -

This of course is not true. He may not of used a private server but he used a private laptop. He did send and receive classified information. That is also documented. It is also documented that he deleted all those emails instead of turning them into the State Department unlike Hillary Clinton.

 

Thats my reasoning when I hear lefties use him as an excuse, prosecute both of then, next!

 

Really, I can't find that part in the audit, please post a link.

 

Are you now claiming that the following is a lie?
"Another revelation is that she instructed Jake Sullivan, her deputy chief of staff at the time and now her campaign foreign-policy adviser, to strip classification from some material and fax it to her over an unsecured channel. “[T]urn into non-paper w no identifying heading and send non-secure,” she told him in what can only be construed as a direct order to violate the law regarding sensitive or classified information."
Source: http://www.veritaspac.com/2016/01/11/when-the-sos-does-it-that-means-its-not-illegal/

“The Department’s current policy, implemented in 2005, is that normal day-to-day operations should be conducted on an authorized Automated Information System (AIS), which “has the proper level of security control to … ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the resident information.”
Source: https://usuncut.com/politics/5-times-hillary-clinton-lied-emails/

Hillary Clinton's Private Server was never authorized because she never told the State Dept., she was using an unauthorized system.

 

The thing that bothers me most is why she did it.

She did it to keep all of her conversations secret from history and from the American people.

This behavior strips away all pretense and lets us know what she really thinks of the American public.

And good for Chris Wallace.

 

Here is the section of the report that states that.

 

There is no independent verification that Clinton ever told anyone to do that. Until I see actual proof I will reserve judgement.

As far as the IG stating she never received permission that is not exactly true. What the IG report stated was they found no evidence that Clinton ever sought permission but the claim for CIO that he was unaware of her use of private email server and private email devices was found to be a false claim and that the CIO was aware of her use.

 

Why won't you post a link?

 

No wonder you won't post a link supporting your statement, it's not true!

The OIG report said no such thing, you got that information from the Mother Jones website.
Looks like you're as deceitful as Hillary herself!

 

WaPo: IG report showed Hillary had “inexcusable, willful disregard” for … rules?
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/05/...-had-inexcusable-willful-disregard-for-rules/

~~~~~~​

 

She planned her daughter's wedding using that server...

 

Do you want me to breath for you too. It takes nano seconds to find the IG webpage.

- - - Updated - - -

Your information is false. That was taken directly from the IG report. The IG report is posted online in several places. It is easy to find.

 

It is clearly obvious that you have not bothered to read the actual report. I don't know where those quotes are from but they are not from the IG report. That is completely false. Anyone saying those quotes are from the IG report is not being honest. You can look up the actual IG report at the State Department IG website. Please do before making any more baseless accusations.

- - - Updated - - -

I also expect a full apology. You are talking out your south side while facing north. Please do not make accusations until you actually read the effin report.

 

This report, right?

Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary. 98 At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act.

 

Again sir the rules changed drastically between 2004 and 2008 and after.

 

Then post the effin link you got your info from, why so much stalling?

The IG report also said the only other secretary of state to use personal email “exclusively” for government business was Colin Powell, contrary to Clinton’s claim that her “predecessors” — plural — “did the same thing.” The IG also said that, like Clinton, Powell did not comply with policies on preserving work-related emails.
But the IG report said the comparison to Powell — who did not use a private server — only goes so far. It said during Clinton’s tenure, the rules governing personal email and the use of nongovernment systems were “considerably more detailed and more sophisticated,” citing specific memos that warned department employees about the security risks of not using the government system.

 

And so did Colin Powell and Rice. In fact also in the report is the fact that Rice's staff purposefully did not brief the incoming administration on the requirements to print and store the emails. The IG reports states specifically that this was done on purpose by Rice when transitioning to the new administration. Also it states that it was the State Departments requirement to ensure those directions were followed and not the Secretary of States' responsibility. It also as I have posted stated, unlike the other SOS administrations the fact that she turned over the emails is a mitigating factor. I never said that Clinton didn't violate the records act but it was clearly a deficiency with the State Department and not individual Secretaries of State.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not stalling. Can you please take some personal responsibility and find the report and read it for yourself before making uninformed claims. I am not here to spoon feed you. Take some effin initiative to make sure that you are not wrong in what you say BEFORE you say it.