‘She Sucked My D*ck’: Moms Go Thermonuclear Over NSFW Material In Class Reading Assignments

Parents condemned the Loudoun County’s school board during a May 11 meeting over explicit material in reading assignments for high school students.

In a series of videos posted by Ian Prior on Twitter, parents read passages from books, including “Monday’s Not Coming” by Tiffany Jackson, which were apparently assigned to 9th grade students in Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS). This is the same school board meeting where a mother blastedthe school system’s use of critical race theory.

<COMMENTS EDITED>


https://dailycaller.com/2021/05/13/...signments-nsfw-virginia-school-board-meeting/





These parents are damn right to be upset about this. I’m glad that news about this is being reported. Between resisting reopening, 1619 project, critical race theory and their treatment of parents opposed to it and now this, that DC suburbs schools are a real mess.

 

I’m glad I live in a conservative area where none of these issues are a concern here. I’d be incensed if that was curriculum material for my son.

 

I have no issues blasting schools on using racist or sexually explicit content - does anyone?

 

It's crude, and on that alone I'd oppose it. There are proper ways to educate 9th graders about sex.

On the other hand, if we're being honest with ourselves, it's nothing 9th graders haven't heard before, nor used themselves.

 

Tough call. Who defines what is considered sexually explicit? Personally, I think the statements in the OP are crossing a line...but I hate to use the old expression "slippery slope" but it probably applies well to this topic.

I read Flowers for Algernon as required in my high school class and it had sexual situations. Was a great book though.

 

Two things - first a comment and then a question:

1) This and the CRT indoctrination taking place in LCPS and elsewhere is why our schools are failing.

2) Aren't the educators peddling this porn to minors breaking the law?

I would do more than take this up with the school board, and I hope the parents in Loudon Co. ratchet up the pressure. They've got some housecleaning to do up there...

 

Ah, progressives at work.....progressing the country straight down the toilet. I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked....sarcasm.

 

WHAT is up with people continuing to Post Entire Articles that Violate Fair Use and Copyright?

Rule 15:

long articles should be quoted from and/or summarized, not quoted in their entirety. Content copied from other sources must meet "fair use" guidelines, and violations of copyright will be deleted and subject to infraction.

Anyway, as to the OP Topic:

It seems like just more of "PC Run AMOK".

Just more fodder for the Faux Outrage crowd.

PS - Rule 15 exists for a very legit reason.

Carry on.

 

This is a tough call. It’s high school so it’s not exactly stuff they don’t know or seek out. When I was in 9th grade back in the early 90’s, we were made to watch Romeo and Juliet and Juliets breasts were shown to us. Again, early 90’s. In Sugarland, TX.

 

Yep, certainly not as wholesome as the Bible:

--Ezekiel 23:19-21 (NIV)

 

We watched the same movie in my HS freshman English class, in the middle of nowhere Wyoming.

 

We watched Romeo and Juliet as well in the 9th grade and remember exactly the scene you are talking about. Would have been mid 80s.

We did have to get a permission slip signed from a parent though.

 

Were the students told they had to read these particular books?? It's not as if 9th graders haven't already been discussing things of this nature for a few years already. If their parents have beyond basic cable they have probably already watched movies with nudity and sex in them either there or on the internet. It's the age we live in.

 

I don’t remember if we did or not. I do not remember anyone having to miss class either, so if we did, all the parents signed off on it lol.

 

But Huck Finn was pulled from the book shelves.

 

I wonder at what age these pretend-angry conservatives deem it appropriate to talk about sexuality. 10th grade? 11th? 12th?

 

Aw come on now Ben....in this day and age,
kids know more about sex than their parents do...and could probably teach them a few things....sarcasm

 

I’m going to be honest when I say; I have no problem with this.
1.)sex in literature is never about sex. It’s about power dynamics. If you want sex in literature, read about how a guy took his gf to a sugar cane field and she sucked on that sweet stalk. Having these kinds of talks actually help people concetualize power about their bodies.
2.) This is the space to do this. It’s not erotica. It’s their life where sex is becoming a theme for theme.
3.)If you really want to stop sex in literature, don’t encourage people to read Shakespeare.

 

The OP did NOT use the entire article and you are NOT a moderator.

Shove off.

 

Remember folks, the left thinks this is acceptable, and worse still, normal

 

I wonder how young "progressives" think children should be exposed to pornography in school.

4th grade? 2nd Grade? Kindergarten?

 

I had to dig to find a different article about the issue and found this. Apparently it isn't required reading - just in the library. And the parents are not saying that they are anti LGBTQ - they just didn't think the books were appropriate for high schoolers. I think they need to take their heads out of their butts if they think high schoolers aren't already reading/hearing about this kind of thing. And maybe these parents need to read Cather in the Rye again.

Loudoun County Public Schools spent nearly $2 million on books for “diverse classroom libraries” in elementary and high schools.

The school district says the majority of the books are about race, culture, language and religion, but the books under scrutiny are ones dealing with LGBTQ topics.

None of the books are required reading, but some feel the books are not appropriate for students. The majority of opponents at the meeting were particularly angry about sexual content in some of the books for high schoolers. GBTLQ school book controversy in Loudoun County (fox5dc.com)

 

Doesn't sound like a sex ed class, seems more like lit. And the material sounds extremely inappropriate for high school kids. I'd be pissed too.

 

Seeing boobies is not quite the same thing as an explicit sex scene.

 

Sex ed? Sure, talk about it. Soft porn? GTFOOH!