“Just move to Iceland if you don’t like diversity, bigot!”

Yes, there are always those genetic cul-de-sacs, but people still do have children, and that requires taking a longer term view.

 

LONG gone. Myself, also.

 

That seems to be the case. Argentina was a major slave holding country in colonial times. Now? Very few Blacks. Where did they go? A mystery...

 

Good thing Africans are adapted to Africa’s climate, then.

Why does a nation have to continuously grow? Population growth naturally slows down in developed societies. It’s hilarious how you guys complain about environmental destruction but you want exponential growth of human populations (except whites, of course).

And Europeans would be able to keep anyone out if they wanted to. Africans are in Europe because of misguided notions of charity (from a certain subversive element) not because they overpowered Europe’s defenses. Let’s not forget we are dealing with a significant IQ difference between the two continents.

 

You don’t really believe in that, though. There would be massive die offs in Africa and other areas but for the foreign aid, medical care, technology, food, and other resources provided for by majority white countries. You’d likely be the first to cry about our duty to help them, in that situation.

 

Why aren't bigots included in diversity?

Not really pro diversity at all. Pro social control. Pro social homogenuity.

A KKK guy and a black rights matter guy living together on the same street.
Diversity.

 

“Diversity” really just means less white people. You’ll never see them complain about the lack of diversity in all minority areas.

 

Europeans have lost their faith because faith is BS. And where this thread is talking about, they were never that devout.

There is this collection of writings called the Icelandic Sagas. They are tales from Viking times. They talked of raids on churches. They spoke of Jesus as an interloper, the son of a lesser God.

The Nordic countries have always been Christian lite. It may have something to do with finding it very difficult to beleive that men from the North descended from Middle Easterners. Even DNA has proven that we didn't.

The old myths from the various tribes in Europe have been mostly wiped from history, from two thousand years of Christian rule. The myths from the north, remain intact. They have even become part of our popular culture. The days of the week are named for some of the characters. Christianity never completely won in the North.

 

Faith may be bs, but no civilization arose, let alone thrived without a faith to give meaning to life. The death of Christianity in Europe signals the death of Europe.

I can't attest to the devoutness of the Icelanders, but driving through the SW part of the island, all the little hamlets had a church.

I don't know why you say the myths of Pagan Europe have been "wiped from history." The Greek and Roman myths provided inspiration for much of high culture throughout Christendom. And low culture, too. My introduction to Greek myth was watching Steve Reeves as Hercules on TV.

 

Yup Greek and Roman mythology are as well known as Norse.
Also King Arthur and Robin Hood.

Santa Claus.

 

There are well understood reasons why the civilizations in Europe are in a different place than the civilizations in Africa, after thousands upon thoisands of years of human progression. And intrinsic factors attributable to race have nothing to do with it. Climate, natural resources, and how hard people had to fight to survive and thrive in their environment over a couple hundred generations tells the story. But to read many of the comments in here, it sounds like many wouldn't agree with that.

 

If you have to fight to survive, you're going to die if you aren't intelligent or strong enough. Which of those two attributes matters depends entirely upon the environment.

hint: sub-saharan africa never really got out of the stone age because they didn't need intelligence to survive. If your biggest adversary is a coconut falling off a tree thus killing the native sleeping under the coconut tree, you're not exactly breeding for the intelligence required to discover fire. It's more like... uhhh.... uncle toby was found dead under a coconut tree so I'm going to sleep under a banana tree.

It takes intelligence to plan and prepare for winter.

 

I don't run in your circles, but it seems to me like Eastern Europe is the place to be.

Increasingly it looks like the Visegrad nations are going to break away from the EU. Most Poles are proud nationalists. 98% of Poles are white, most ethnically Polish.

If I was on your side of these issues that's where I'd go.

It's odd that of the top 20 cities by foreign born citizens, all 20 are Western, traditionally white cities (with the exception of Hong Kong, which has extenuating circumstances).

Asians are some of the most racially homogeneous societies on Earth and the general attitude there is very racist by Western standards.

Don't even start on Africa and the ME.

It's only white nations which allow half their cities to be foreigners.

Millions of Eastern Europeans lived under Stalin, they know where this leads.

 

---

 

What an odd way to think. Who thinks about other men enough to even give them a name line cuck.

My thinking often goes along the line of other guy's girlfriends. How does the saying go? "If it wasn't for other men's girlfriends and wives, I wouldn't have half the sex I do."

 

Coconuts originated in India and east Asia. You are attempting to be clever, I guess, but the notion that one race has groomed intelligence better than another belies the facts that anyone with a proper early education and access to books can attain the highest levels of academic achievement, regardless of race. Let's stop with the subtle innuendo that one group is smarter than another by nature. There is literally no evidence to back this up, and lots of evidence to refute this.

 

Cuckold is not a new term and goes back to the 13th century. You think it's weird, but... if I'm porking your old lady while you're busy playing world of warcraft, you're a cuck. That's basically what the term means, and it has nothing to do with not being able to get laid.

 

ummm.... education doesn't change intelligence.

You might want to read up on the subject.

Seriously, you're not worth my time because you know nothing about the subject.

 

Sorry, maybe my Stanford education didn't prepare me to discuss intelligence with you, Belch. Just come out and say it. Are you suggesting one continent has a more intelligent population than another? If so, please stack rank the continents for us. Back it up with credible evidence as well.

 

If you're really interested, you could have gone to wiki, but... bleh...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nations_and_intelligence

IQ tests have been going on since the first world war, so there's quite a bit you're obviously ignorant of.

Get back to me when you've got all studied up on the subject.

p.s. your claimed stanford education means nothing in the real world, so just full stop. Nobody with a few brain cells to rub together blabs about their "education". You either hang, or you don't.

So far, you're not hanging. All you did there was to blab about a nothing burger of an education and say that it didn't prepare you to discuss the topic. This admission that you know nothing about the subject thanks to your "stanford education" isn't blowing air up any skirts.

You might as well have told us you know nothing about anything.

Good ol' Stanford!

 

LOL, I maybe struck a nerve!

First thing I saw on your wiki page was that the entire subject is controversial. 2nd thing I saw was a cited link about the correlation between rising IQ scores and education levels. So apparently my own intuition is worth more than whatever background reading you may have done. Do me a favor and read the link you provided, and then get back to me!

 

Well of course it's controversial. Jeez! Is there any subject that isn't? That's the whole point of knowledge. At one point, science was controversial. Didn't they teach you that at Stanford?

Well I guess they didn't, or you wouldn't be pointing to a controversy when it comes to these things as if it's relevant.

OMG!!! There's a controversy because science is saying that the earth revolves around the sun, instead of the other way around!!! Controversy controversy!!!!!

You stanford boyahs don't exactly embrace controversy, I guess.

as for the cited intelligence levels raising because of education, I'm not really sure which part you're talking about. You mind expanding on that?

 

Looks to me like Judaism is taking on global Islam in the battle for world domination? I mean, who TF would leave a temperate climate to go and live the rest of their lives in a cold one unless it was to achieve some kind of agenda?

 

That's a great question! I'm not exactly looking to live in Alaska because it's freezing up there!!!

Last I checked, real estate prices weren't exactly rising based on the amount of snowfall, but... the lefties are all about "Hey, let's take these guys out of places where it doesn't snow, and put them where it does snow, because, ya know, snow is all about easy livin'!!!!

No, they're really silent on this, and I'm guessing that they're silent on this issue because....

and lefties will not be able to come up with something that comes after the word "because". I don't want to say they're just stupid, but... well, let's give them a chance to explain. I want to think that my opponents have more intelligence than a dead squid, so....

Have at it lefties!!!!

 

I already conceded that it's controversial, so, let's go onto your second point that... you saw a cited link, and figured out (all by your lonesome?) that because of that cited link you saw, that your own intuition is worth more than whatever background reading I may have read?

Are they pumping out retards at stanford now? I do have a few colleagues from Stanford, and they're not that stupid, but they are kinda old.