And just who is going to do anything about it? The only teeth that tribunal has is if they can actually get ahold of the person. And no country is going to turn in the person that ended a never ending war against that country. And if I was captured...so what? I ended a war that's been going on for 70 years. Good enough for me. At least I stopped a war that has caused more deaths than what I did. Because I assure you anyone faced with such a situation is going to capitulate quickly. Just like Japan did.
So you would have no moral hesitation in committing war crimes. Genocide. If that’s what it takes to win a war, kill every man, woman and child of your opponent. Combatant or not - wipe ‘em out. Well, at least you’re honest about it. But think for a moment - that puts you on exactly the same level as Hamas. That’s what they did. You’re no better than Hamas. Let that thought keep you warm as you fall asleep tonight.
anyone faced with such a situation is going to capitulate quickly. Just like Japan did Japan did not capitulate quickly, it took a second atomic bomb and Russian invasion to get them to talk. You forget about Vietnam, Mesada, or how about any ME terrorist.
Seems to me if a society though the way you do about your family demise they'd "terrorist" not think twice about repeating that sort of thing to your neighbors and folk you live around.. Kinda wierd when think hard on it.. But hey, that's you world.
You know, you can defend against terrorism without slaughtering tens of thousands of innocents. But, of course, it is less profitable for politicians and the MIC.
Like what, a stern warning after the burial... Pay them to be better, give them everything they demand
One opinion that has more personal experience with the situation than everyone else on this forum combined, and then some.
1: It wouldn't actually take that much to end the war. Which means no genocide. 2: I'm doing it to stop a decades long war. Not because "my god hates them".
You are wrong. Not on the same day. If you can be wrong about that, maybe you should question the other things you believe to be true.
1. You said you would be willing to go that far. You would engage in genocide against the Palestinian people in order to protect Israel. First, that would be a war crime but you have already indicated that you don’t care. Second, you must logically have no moral objection to the Palestinians adopting the same approach. 2. Your approach is that you feel justified in doing anything, if it is for the right reason. Genocide, mutilation, rape, all would be ok if you have a better reason than the other side. Problem with that is, they see it the same way, but think their reasons are better than yours. In any case, your approach makes you no better than Hamas. Or Nazi Germany for that matter.
Yeah, call it a brain fart. I'll admit to being embarrassed on that one. But my overall point still stands. The reason Japan capitulated was due to overwhelming force being used.
You would think that on page 1 of "Ethnic cleansing for dummies", it would say: "be sure not to leave a future generation."
I don't know if a country defending themselves against people that constantly attack them is "ethnic cleansing" but sure, call it whatever you want. I prefer to call it what it is - SELF DEFENSE
My point exactly. You'd think that if Israel was engaging in genocide, like leftists are saying, they'd be especially careful not to leave a future generation, because that would be counter to their goal. Instead, 98% have been spared. Worst. Genocide. Ever.