“Slow motion insurrection”

Oh you mean kind of like how you flood in illegals with the intent that they're going to vote blue that kind of negation?

 

Ah yes, resistance is futile !!!!

 

Until they have to live in the s******* democratically ran States and realize that the ideology of the left is ridiculous and switch their allegiance from Blue to red...

 

Be afraid. Be very afraid. Cnn is saying to stay inside, mask up, and don’t come out until Nov. 5 2022.

 

Yeah I guess you prefer to live in a red state where the AG kills someone and does no time.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...-fines-no-jail-time-pedestrian-death-n1277705

 

"...deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6..."

This is anything but Current News. Maybe fairy tales. Beyond the unarmed white woman who was murdered, where was the deadly insurrection?

 

So did Trump win?

 

You mean like how that trans twit Biden nominated killed countless of elderly people because he shoe horned infected people into nursing homes while at the same time taking his parents out?

lol

 

He waited until the next day to go back and see what he hit. That is beyond insane.

 

" When the dead can vote , the living must revolt ! " '

​

 

They even found the victims glasses in his car.

 

Just a wee bit off topic.

 

So, let me get this straight.

He hit "something" he assumed was a deer.

He went home and returned the next day. Why? There had to be something that lead him to return to the scene and a deer would be handled by animal control or forest rangers so there would be no reason for him to go back there. That gives me the impression he *knew* that he did NOT hit an animal.

He hit the victim with enough impact for his glasses to end up in the AG's vehicle. That means either the windshield was broken and/or the windows were down and if the windows were down, the victim probably made some kind a noise upon impact. All of that also points to him being reasonably sure that he did NOT hit an animal.

But, if the windows were broken or down, why didn't the driver notice the victim's glasses before the police (or whomever) searched his vehicle?

What was he doing from the time he left the scene of an accident and his return the following day? It's doubtful that he slept if it was nagging his brain that he hit a person so why did it take so long to go back? And, why didn't he call the police or animal control when he first arrived to his destination? Or, the next morning before going back?

I didn't see anything about an autopsy but I'm wondering if the victim may have survived if he had received immediate medical attention. I don't know the laws in that state but it's usually a crime to leave the scene of an accident and if the victim may have survived had he not left the scene, why was he not charged with vehicular homicide?

My best guess is he went home and reached out to various people to try to cover this up and whomever was involved in those conversations with him probably advised him to go back to the scene to give the appearance of being concerned but he blew that act because the victim's family said he showed no remorse.

I also suspect that he may have been under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs and needed that out of his system before involving the police. There is no other reasonable explanation of why it took him twelve hours to go back to the scene. There is no other reasonable explanation why he didn't call 911 as soon as it happened or when he first arrived to his destination. It's irrelevant if people said they didn't see him consuming alcohol. There are plenty of functioning alcoholics. And, being under the influence explains why he was too stupid to NOT check his vehicle before contacting the police.

All of it is a bit "too neat" for my taste.

Finally, why aren't the residents of that state raising holy hell about him getting away with homicide?

P.S. Ugh. I do not like people right now. This is sickening.

 

How the glasses got in the car is unknown.

https://nypost.com/2021/02/24/victi...ar-of-south-dakota-ag-who-said-he-hit-a-deer/

This is another example of 2 sided justice. If the courts had any integrity something would have been said. This was obviously a snow job.

 

~ Reminds us of the Teddy Kennedy case. We all remember how that worked out.

 

I think there are 4 levels

1. Insiders (people in the criminal justice system that work together).
2. Celebrities (Hollywood)
3. Upper and middle class white Christians.
4. Everybody else.

I think we need a complete do over. It ticks me off that people will talk forever about what the Kardashians are doing and this stuff is just shrugged off? Are our priorities that far gone?

 

It is so weird that you said that. I swear I thought about that case when I was typing my post. Are you a mind reader, James Californiai?

 

~ I think many of us are thinking of the similarities. Sad situations .. .

 

Can you please remind us again who it was in 2016 who was talking about faithless electors to steal the election?

Democrats are always projecting on to others

 

Not worth it. You believe the BS in the article I don't. Nothing u could say will change your mind, but I will call it out as absolute nonsense, straight up lying, because that's what it is.

 

To be fair, they have been told that they are victims and will be further victimized. Fear and anger are not conducive to rational thought.

 

I believe we just need to be persistent and hold them accountable. Also, I would remove the immunity legal protections from the police.

 

The latter will lead to a shortage of people willing to do that job. I agree *something* has to change, but I'm not entirely sure that it's legal protections for LEOs.

 

I disagree 100%. In my town the police are paid extremely well for their work, but to add legal protections, only makes it easier for one side to be abusive.

I personally have been the target of police crap work and false reporting.

 

Show us where illegals voted…..go ahead we can wait