13 minutes of truth

The truth movement has proved 9/11 was an inside job. Don't be the last to know.

The 9/11 Toronto Report

 

When does the grand jury hearing start?

 

I don't know. I will volunteer to be on it if asked.

 

Of course it is. Lies are only lies when truth is highlighted. Got it.

 

Guaranteed: there won't ever be one.
No one will ever form it.

 

they would only ask engineering and architecture experts.

 

If only we could figure out a way where corporations could profit wildly from it, then, maybe the truth would be told. Keep up the good fight, bro.

 

So you've lied before? Then then, according to you, everything you say is a lie right? Thanks for clarifying.

 

Pretty harsh, calling Fraud a third grader.

 

You have to be kidding me. RtWngaFraud has been telling the truth for years. While you are not smart enough to understand his truths is proof that government schooling/indoctrination works. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=332351

 

You just called him a third grader ... I was just saying it was pretty harsh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCjEi4z2KZA

 

According to him though, if you've lied before, then you have no credibility and can't be trusted right? SO I'm sure that RtWngaFraud has told lies before right BJ? Or is he Jesus Christ? SO using his logic, if you've lied before, you can't be trusted. EVER.

 

Silly boy.

 

Thanks, bro. It is futile to try and have an honest conversation within these ranks, and with such infested jungles. Truth is something that is combated, tooth and nail, and if you speak TOO loudly, well, you'll be..."punished", as you've now learned for yourself. The control runs very deep...

 

No, wrong. Truth is reality. What you are proposing is not reality. You want everyone to put aside what those of on the ground eye witnessed that day, suspend reality in favor of you not-based-on-fact claims. How is that reasonable?

Do you also believe the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary was a hoax?

 

Apparently, you can selectively ignore discrepancies in the official accounting of the incident. How is that any different?

Sandy Hook? Well, what is it you guys always say? "Irrelevant'?

 

Inconsistencies?...Oh you mean things we don't know? Name one.

 

No, I mean the missing or incorrect information and accounting displayed in the "official" BS story. One SMALL example would be the changing NORAD timelines, and their 'versions' of what the military did or didn't do.

 

What changes in the NORAD timelines?...for what?

 

I heave lots of posts on it. Use your "search" option (if you're really interested in the answer to the question you posed), or not. I don't care.

 

Once again, you can't get specific unless you cut and past something. Why is that? Broad claims have no value or validity...not to mention its disingenuous.

H

 

Search function didn't turn up anything huh? Well, to be fair, what can you do in two minutes huh?

 

You haven't heaved one, not a single one.

 

i was an official story hugger once too. at least till I applied a little physics. now I am appalled at the level of bull(*)(*)(*)(*) perpetrated on the american people.

 

Incorrectly I might add...