I'm still not sure what sounds like more fun, having some viscous (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) I can call "Hilldog" or an old, fat, balding version of Richey Rich in the whitehouse. Remind me again why we don't really have a third option.
We do have a third option. It's called prioritizing your opinions when you vote. I say figure out what you think is best for the country and prioritize on what will further your opinion. Voters should never accept everything a candidate says is their goals.
I'd say it's best to assume that anything that sounds good is a lie. For instance when I heard things like transparent government, shut down gitmo, no more crazy wars, what the candidate (Obama) really meant was more secrecy and punishment of whistle blowers, killing US citizens without trial in the middle east, and the expansion of middle east wars. Guess what I'm saying is that is we want actual change, gotta dump the two paries.
Because there is no law that restricts stupid people from voting. We live in a generation that can name the kardashians but not their representatives. You cant fix that.
This is why I think Trump will win. He has brand name, and Hildog is just an awful person from what I've seen of her. That aside she's also a annul politician. Why anyone would want her in charge of anything is beyond me. She represents arbitrary restriction and that's about it. - - - Updated - - - Why? /10char
Yeah, I kinda figured you were talking about our two party system. And, I agree. Though it will never happen. To many people have the us vs them mentality. What people should do is pick a candidate based on the character of the individual in the primaries. Then in the general election choose based on about two issues. Because, for each president they can only accomplish a change in legislation for couple of things. For me, so far, I would like to see Carson and Biden square off. God forbid we choose between two genuinely good people.
