According to this video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NKneR0ghgM "The New American Century (6/10) PNAC Exposed" (7:00 time mark) ...the war in Afghanistan is about building an oil pipeline.
hmm yeah, US in Afghanistan to build a gas pipeline between Turkmenistan and Pakistan.. seems perfectly legit. Same reason the US went to Iraq "for oil".. except all the major oil contracts went to Russian and China. Damn facts, kills truthers every time.
Only an insider would be in a position to know the reasons. Maybe it would have been too difficult to guard. Who knows what kinds of behind-the-scenes deals might have been made. Anyway, the US wanted Iraq to deal in dollars and Iraq wanted to deal in euros. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2003/feb/16/iraq.theeuro http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Iraq/Iraq_dollar_vs_euro.html That seems to be the main reason they wanted Libya and still want Iran. http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CLA410A.html http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=libya+gold+dinar&sm=1 I hope everyone knows that Iran used to be a de facto American colony. http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Iran_KH.html Here are two good sites where objective info on this can be gotten. http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/ http://www.globalresearch.ca/
So on one hand scott/cosmored/fatfreddy 88/david c says the evidence is crushing,and the other hand he says 'who knows?' We're NOT laughing with you,kid
You're trying to cloud the issue to confuse the viewers. The evidence is crushing that the government planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=321927&page=42&p=1063295289#post1063295289 (post #41 It's pretty obvious that they did it so that the American people would support their invasions. The reasons for their invasions are obviously oil and money-related. Sometimes original plans don't work out and changes have to be made. If their studies were to show that they'd never be able to protect a pipeline against periodic bombings by the millions of resentful local people, it's plausible that they'd postpone it for a while or change the plan. There are lots of plausible scenarios; only insiders know which one is the real one. Our not knowing exactly what they're thinking and planning to do with Afghanistan doesn't make the crushing proof of an inside job go away.
Confuse, obfuscate, cloud...whatever can be done to keep the discussion as muddy and non specific as possible, then throw in a few insults for good measure. That's the agenda of the disinformation specialist. It's what they do.
That's been your agenda since you joined here. Good of you to admit it. Hey ... THAT must be why you link to all the 'no-planes' sites! You're just clouding the issue.
Not mine Han...yours. You've been at it right here for close to a decade now. Oh...that's right! Only 2 years...I almost forgot the "official" number.
Look what you just did there, Fraud: "keep the discussion as muddy and non specific as possible, then throw in a few insults for good measure". Your agenda is showing.
Replicating your behavior, for demonstration purposes, isn't very difficult. Obtaining the truth, is my agenda. What's yours?
Pointing out idiots who link to 'no-planes' sites and then claim they are trying to obtain the truth.
Another effective smackdown, ey boss? You can't find anything in the 37 points raised, that have any truth to them at all, huh? Amazing....
I presented points to you, as did several others, boy. You snivelled and whined and failed to back up your claims. Again. Why do you keep linking to 'no-planes' sites, Fraud? (You'll not answer, I know)
Since when did you pay any attention to any links that weren't 'officially' provided? Aren't they all null and void if they aren't stamped "official"?
I read the links you posted. I quoted their no-plane lunacy. You failed to explain why you support them.
We all actually do lookto see which gloriously stupid lie you are schlepping out each time. Weneed an occasional fofl.