Wall Street Republicans gave us Hitler: https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_Hitler.pdf I have no doubt they will bring us that Fourth Reich as well. No surprise that the movement is growing with the growth of the Republican party in the USA. Perhaps it is more than a coincidence (?).
Would you prefer if I said you seek their nuclear decimation? To be the judge over them. Decide on justice for them, where your justice = their genocide? You will not rule.
And they certainly have a lot of it. But what of the European future? Even their present looks a little shaky. How would you have prevented European wars?
You can say what you like, it's just that I need to know what you are talking about before I can reply. But this is more specific and it is a good start. Yes, I would most definitely like to see US nuclear decimation. EDIT: I am talking about US nuclear programe decimated, not the nation/population. Isn't it funny how you immediately make the absurd assumption of genocide? How am I suppose to have a discussion with you if you go off on some tangent and treat it as though it was me who said it? EDIT: I now see from the misunderstanding about nuclear-decimation how you got that idea. Really? Are you sure? And that is what I want ..... right? I suppose that I said that too?
if you think about it working together actually caused ww1 austria invades serbia russia joins to helps serbia germany joins to helps austria against russia france joins to help russia against germany and so on
I guess you're right and I think it was the US that was the only nation that felt Germany should be helped onto its feet (with guidance) but Europe (the nations that took part, not the ones that managed to remain neutral) were in agreement that Germany should be brought to its knees at the end of WW I. So yeah, you could say Europe was "working together" (in agreement anyway) that caused WW II. That's certainly one way to look at it.
History does tend to repeat, and we know what Europe's history is. With the immigration issues going on in Europe it probably wouldn't take much to get the white nationalists riles up against the "economic immigrants." Just saying.
Judging by Juncker's remarks I would say he's not worried about the white nationalists. Just the opposite actually. Sounds like he is inciting them to rise up and make the EU force to reckon with.
actually, commies are likelier to be inside the Republican party: https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf
Will people be disappointed again? Yes. Will minority cultures occasionally seek independence? Yes. But will there be another Hitler? I think you are stretching to insinuate there will be. There is nothing to indicate there will or won't be. Really? Tell me. Tell me what makes Europe any different on the subject of immigration. I mean, since you are eager to single out Europe as though there is something sinister about it. Do you disregard American history as being somehow less likely to revolt or make war? That is not possible. We have had less war than you since your inception. "The White Nationalists"? huh? I am not a White Nationals and I am "riled up against" our government that allows the immigration issues to go on. "Wouldn't take much", you say? I pointed this out once in an earlier response. Immigration is a problem for us for many reasons. Many reasons! But what the immigrants represent is only a problem for us because it clashes with our own culture, laws, habits, behaviour, etc. etc. etc. In other words who and what those people are is not a problem "at home" from whence they came. THEY, in other words, is not the problem. Our problem is the politicians who've left the door unlocked. Continuing to claim that we in Europe are "riled up against the economic immigrants" is not really true but if you really insist on naming "White Nationalists" then you needn't mention it - that minority is ALWAYS "riled up".
The Nazis procured property of Jews. They shared the wealth, by taking it from the Jews. Hitler was Left Wing.
I only skimmed the article briefly. My bad if I mischaracterized Junckers position. In general I think forcing EU members to accept immigrants is a violation of sovereignty.
I'm not even sure what that's supposed to mean. Are you suggesting that these people haven't brought a high level of violent crime with them?
This was a misunderstanding? The justice of nations being decimated. Hard to misunderstand that one. Either way. You don't get to rule. And yes, I am sure that is what you want. You are sitting here telling people what they should and shouldn't do. What is best for us all. Like you are god and you know. You will not rule. We have nukes to prevent you from doing so. Your only hope of rule over us is for us to lose them. So you have none. With that in mind, I suggest you change tack. Find a workable path towards peace. I suggest you begin with learning to respect your neighbours and their chosen ways of life.
