You asked the above and I answered. You then went on to make it sound as if I was dodging the question in a pathetic attempt to make me look silly. MIRROR TIME. PS, for the amazingly, pathetically moronic posters who are so stupid, they should not be allowed to walk the streets without professional carers, I am a Muslim.
In regards to my previous post about wiki, I try not to use it at all. Since it can be edited it's very difficult to know if the information is factual. There are some sourced sections which have come in handy, it also works for common sense definitions (i.e. occam's razor, Maslow's hierarchy of needs, etc.). However, it doesn't stand up to sites like 9/11myths, or most of the JREF postings. They use multiples reputable sources to prove their points, just making my point on what I deem credible for sources. Secondly, so? What does your being a Muslim have to do with anything? That's like saying since I'm a fat guy I know everything about food.
Gladly, here you go. It's all factual, want to know how I know? Because my father owns one of the companies involved. The building was vacant, it was destroyed, apartments are going to be built, they got tax breaks to pay for the demolition, and the blue prints reflect the building description. That article is 100% factual and it is internet media taken from a main stream source. Anything else?
The posts get dafter. Wiki is rubbish but not when you quote it for something you like the sound of and I don't know anything about Muslims but, when you find out I'm a Muslim, it doesn't mean I know anything about Muslims. All this crap because the people named by the FBI as suicide bombers are still alive. Bloody hell, the BBC have interviewed them on camera - what more do you need?
I wouldn't put Forum Communications Company up as something fantastic. The tried to publish names even though they were aware their actions may cause problems for the people named. http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20080052.htm Not very nice of them.
Are you seriously this dumb? Find something in the article that isn't factual, and I will gladly dispute it. I didn't say I know it's a fact because daddy is building it. In fact, I didn't even say my dad owned it, that's how (*)(*)(*)(*)ing bad you guys are at reading comprehension. I mean, seriously, are you able to read and comprehend ANYTHING that is written? Anything at all? I said my dad owns a company building it, and the information contained in the article is factual. Which is what I was asked to do. Jesus, it's like watching an elephant tie a shoe.
It seems too every time you comment, yep. Once again, truthers complete inability to comprehend or understand anything that is written is on full display. I never said that I only accept things I like. I said that I don't believe things that aren't properly sourced on Wiki, because anyone can post anything they want. However, like the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing examples I gave, things like occam's razor, and Maslow's hierarchy of needs that are defined on wikipedia don't need to be confirmed. They are common sense descriptions. If I went to wiki and did a search for Maslow's hierarchy of needs, and got the nutrition pyramid my brain would say, "Bull(*)(*)(*)(*), stop reading, move on." It's not whether I like it or not, it's whether it's accurate or not. I determine it's accuracy by clicking on the little numbers, and reading the sources. You know...what they're for. I'm saying that you being Muslim doesn't make you an expert on all things Muslim. There are people that claim to be Catholics that don't know anything about the bible. I used the comparison of saying, since I'm a fat guy I know all things food. It's a perfectly simple and accurate comparison. Stop and think for once before you post.
First off, what relevance does this have too...anything? You asked me to provide a factual piece of media, and I did. Now you're attempting to discredit them because in 2008 they wanted access to jurors? You accuse people of the murder of thousands, and you have the balls to judge a newspaper over asking for jurors names? Get real. Way to dodge your own request though. Also, I wasn't putting them up there as "something fantastic", I never even made the claim. Great job at attempting to put words in my mouth. For you guys being the "truth" movement, you'll certainly lie, cherry pick, or do anything you can to mislead people. chuckle heads
Originally Posted by PPP Give me one source of corporate powered political news in mainstream media or internet media that is 100% factual? I will add this: I did not think I had to bring it to a 1st grade level of understanding
The directly above is your original quote, quit making (*)(*)(*)(*) up. Nice to see you're moving the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing goalposts again. Do you ever get sick of lying? Why would you say something so completely stupid, when I can go back and find the truth? So now, because I proved you to be wrong, somehow you have to bring it down to 1st grade for me? Look in the mirror buddy. You're lying, you're busted lying, and that goes to show to anyone that reads your posts exactly what you and your movement are made of.
Good, I've grown tired of you constantly moving the goal posts. I've shown in this thread that you can't even stop from lying between pages of posts. You're a liar.
In your mind. I didn't blame "Jews" for anything. I believe there may be enough evidence to strongly suggest some Jews, or maybe the Israeli government were involved but not "Jews". There, for the terminally idiotic, is a massive difference between "Jews" and "some Jews". One suggest traits or blame for a whole group whilst the other, my term, suggest the same but only for the guilty, not all. What you're doing is attributing anti Jewish feeling where there is none. You made it up, you told an untruth, you lied. - - - Updated - - - In your mind. I didn't blame "Jews" for anything. I believe there may be enough evidence to strongly suggest some Jews, or maybe the Israeli government were involved but not "Jews". There, for the terminally idiotic, is a massive difference between "Jews" and "some Jews". One suggest traits or blame for a whole group whilst the other, my term, suggest the same but only for the guilty, not all. What you're doing is attributing anti Jewish feeling where there is none. You made it up, you told an untruth, you lied.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm The FBI published names and photos but, after interviews were released, they said they'd simply got the wrong name. How about the wrong photo, wrong flight school, wrong everything else. Bloody hell, you invaded a country on evidence that was proven to be false. How many dead American soldiers did that cost you?
No evidence of a plane crash - nothing. [video=youtube;mcWT2lQszEE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcWT2lQszEE[/video]
WOW - WTC 7 fell down. Pity is was in the background, still standing. Here's what happened; the propaganda machine released the news just a little too early and before they'd fired the demolition charges. The anti Jewish section of the video is a sad spoil to what is otherwise a compelling piece of evidence. [video=youtube;s0qdLoobkUI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0qdLoobkUI[/video]
