9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - The Big Picture

Discussion in '9/11' started by PPP, Mar 24, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You need to put this in the conterxt of what was going on. The fire department had other things to do besides keeping the press up to speed. Normal lines of communications were toast. A lot of information had to be sent out by word-of-mouth.

    That can get garbled on a good day. You have nothing here.

    As for the anti-Jerwish crap on the video, maybe it is more signifcant than the facts that they are reporting because it tells us something about who is behind the tin foil curtain around 9/11.
     
  2. Indofred

    Indofred Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,103
    Likes Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    83
    A agree in part. In a difficult situation, information is commonly blurred and errors are made.
    However, this was a press release that was very badly timed.
    Consider this, how is it that a building, with no serious damage, is reported to have fallen by official channels, just before it actually falls.
    Up to that point, there were only small fires reported and nothing to suggest structural damage of any sort.
    Other building, far closer to the twin towers, remained standing, even though they had far worse damage.
    Still, they didn't house all the files for major wall street investigations.
     
  3. Indofred

    Indofred Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,103
    Likes Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You really do have to lie (or at least twist the truth) to make your point.
    He clearly states, there was small wreckage but none of the large components you always find at a crash site.
    He also tells us, there was only a small hole in the building, not something big enough for an aircraft to have made.

    I see it this way, if you have to twist things to make your point, you're clearly incorrect.
     
  4. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because a foreign news company got something wrong?

    No serious damage? What the hell are you talking about? It just had 2 110 storey skyscrapers fall into it causing MASSIVE damage to multiple floors and started raging fires throughout the entire building. How is that no serious damage? Makes it extremely apparent you have no idea what you're talking about. Speaking from pure ignorance.

    Something you guys don't seem to understand is several people knew WTC 7 was going to collapse for hours before it did. There was a raging inferno inside and an entire corner of the building was gone. There are, literally, dozens of quotes from firefighters, first responders, etc. that are saying building 7 is coming down. In fact, they even pulled everyone out of the collapse zone (much to the anger of the firefighters who were searching for their brothers) in advance. There's nothing odd about this, hearing that the building is going to collapse inevitably can easily get miscommunicated. You even stated such yourself. Add in someone who maybe isn't as fluent with the WTC complex, and can't pick out buildings. Sounds reasonable to me.

    This is a bold faced lie. There is nothing factual in the above statement. There were multiple reports of raging fires on multiple floors, and a 13 floor gash taken out of the building. To say what you said is nothing less than a lie, and you know it.

    Jesus, first off, there was no real documentation lost in the building collapse. All relevant and important information was saved on servers. I have seen no evidence of any important information lost during the collapse.

    You truthers love comparing apples to oranges. There were a few buildings that were standing, almost all of them had to be destroyed. The buildings that were standing were not 47 storeys, hell some of them weren't over 10. They were reinforced concrete, and the steel section of all those buildings failed due to the fires that were started.

    Do some research.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lying again?
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    now thats some serious hard core troughing man!

    prematurely talking about the destruction of a building blamed on muslims and you say they got something wrong

    yeh they (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up and showed it was known in advance. DOH

    positions like that are borderline sycophant if not having one foot in the white room.
     
  7. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Apple, chicken salami, pickles, gravy and lemon. *nod*
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeh gets tougher every day pushing that official "story"

    [​IMG]
     
  9. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    *shrug* not really. You guys are the most entertaining people I find. Not even my children say things as dumb as you guys and they're only 10. My 13 year old, he knows more about 9/11 than you do. He doesn't get as much of a kick out of it as I do.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am sure he knows your version. I wonder if he wil be so prone to the enjoyment of embarrassment and red faces as troughers of today are suffering from truthers gittin it done?
     
  11. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LoL my son has watched woo shows. I assure you, he knows your side of the story.
     
  12. PPP

    PPP New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The nut doesn't fall far from the tree.....
     
  13. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Speaking of nuts, did you notice that neither of the two who reporters who got the story wrong are from New York?
     
  14. Indofred

    Indofred Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,103
    Likes Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ask the BBC, not me.
    Its their story so moan at them. However, the FBI photo and the man interviewed by the BBC do look very much alike.
    They also attended the same flight school and lived at the same address.
    Clearly an error that anyone could make.
     
  15. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    <eyeroll> lazy truthers...
     
  16. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There will always be secret information that the public will never know about.
     

Share This Page