9/11 Physics: "You Can't Use Common Sense"

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Mar 20, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Dingo44

    Dingo44 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    661
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh boo hoo.... whinning cause your baseless theories are questioned and not everyone buys your complete BS.

    Oh lord, please don't put me on ignore, the last thing I want is for a holocaust denier and a truther to put me on ignore..

    whatever shall I do?
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats right!

    it has to have the gobbermint grade AAA bull(*)(*)(*)(*) seal of approval and thats a ok with troughers. The bigger the lie the more they worship it!

    holocaust denier? You mean people still believe in the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing holocaust?

    got a real noob here peeps!
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dont you think it would be wise to educate yourself first so I dont have to go behind you and correct you all the damn time?

    Yes you are trying to impress people out here since you have no math, none, zippo, nada and you never will.
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thing the truthers can't or won't grasp is that it wasn't JUST the government that investigated 9/11
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, they do. It happened.
     
  6. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Astrophysicists claim the universe is 13 billion years old. Is mathematics 1 million years old? One hundred thousand? Calculus and Newtonian Physics are not even 500 years old.

    Physics is how reality works. It does not matter if people understand it. But it consists of inanimate matter and forces. It is incapable of giving a damn about anything. Mathematics is merely a help in understanding it. The Sun did not orbit the Earth just because people thought it did and could not do the math.

    And I really don't give a damn what YOU regard as credible. All of the people who have decided to believe that airliners of less than 200 tons including 30 tons of fuel could destroy 400,000 ton buildings in less than two hours have already designated themselves as mentally defective.

    Can't even figure out what questions to ask to solve the problem.

    psik
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You REALLY have an obscenely huge ego problem...Calculus is MUCH older than 500 years,Newton in fact used it...

    Mathematics is at least as old as humanity.

    And it's amazing the damage a bullet that weighs ounces,if even that,can do to a much larger human body,or even bigger animals

    200 tons was plenty..
     
  8. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    11,013
    Likes Received:
    3,935
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Every time you get called on your mistakes you bring out this bs. You're making a mistake. You're right that the physical world doesn't give a damn that you're making a mistake, but that does not somehow make your mistake correct. Your explanation for your observation is wrong. This explanation can be proven wrong but if you refuse to learn the concepts that prove you wrong you'll always be wrong.

    As you already admitted, momentum and inertia cannot slow the progress of the collapse to zero. You can run a momentum conservation all day long and you'll never mathematically show a point where the collapse stops. This is why you keep calling the math bull(*)(*)(*)(*). It's because the only math you know to describe the collapse doesn't work to describe the collapse.

    The process that you assert should have slowed the collapse to zero (the energy lost damaging the structure) is the process that you don't have any understanding of at all. This is what you need to learn about.
     
  9. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    When did I say momentum and inertia were the only factors?

    You are the one who talks about buckling and complain about my saying "crush".

    But both require energy and the only source would be the kinetic energy of the falling mass. But then we don't have data on the amount of energy required to collapse each level of the core. It takes 0.118 joules for one of my single paper loops.

    It's not a "mistake" when you leave out information, is it?

    psik
     
  10. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I am supposed to be insulted by the obscenely ignorant?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_calculus

    ROFLMAO

    I knew that Newton was credited "by some" for inventing calculus when I was in grade school. On no, there goes that obscenely huge ego problem getting out of hand again.

    But there have been recent discoveries that Archimedes was approaching the invention of calculus before he was killed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes_Palimpsest

    But still the universe was running on physics before the dinosaurs were wiped out. Did gravity have anything to do with that meteor impact.

    psik
     
  11. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female


    Eyes darlin' , the difference between us and 'them', as far as the controlled demo is concerned, is that we believe our own eyes as they do not dare to believe theirs.

    Let them stay stuck in their totally insane muddle of nonsensical equations,

    For ''Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.'' and indeed that are all that ;-)
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    <shakes head> Useless to post to someone so steeped in their ignorance that they can't admit being wrong..Calculus in one form or another has been around for thousands of years

    - - - Updated - - -

    There was NO 'controlled demo'...you're seeing what you wish to see.
     
  13. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You do not seem to have provided a link to support your claim. LOL

    psik
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You provided the link,homer.....


    'LOL'
     
  15. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    http://www.math.tamu.edu/~dallen/history/archimed/archimed.html

    LOL alright. I just gave you an excuse to BS. Notice that says "anticipated" not invented. You can't find anything to support your claim because there aren't any. Problems that needed calculus to be solved existed before Newton and Leibniz and some Greek mathematicians recognized the issues involved but no one invented calculus to solve them.

    psik
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ummmm,a precursor to calculus is still ',like I said 'one form or another',didn't say a damn thing about him inventiing anything save his archimedes screw


    begone.
     
  17. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You said:
    You did not bring up Archimedes, I did.

    psik
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jesus what a d******,you can't even follow a thread.

    enough of your thread derailing.
     
  19. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah the even stupider ones came after 9/11 by morons claiming it was an inside job, the joooooos did it, or my favorite, it looks judt like a CD therefore it is!
     

Share This Page