Oh boo hoo.... whinning cause your baseless theories are questioned and not everyone buys your complete BS. Oh lord, please don't put me on ignore, the last thing I want is for a holocaust denier and a truther to put me on ignore.. whatever shall I do?
thats right! it has to have the gobbermint grade AAA bull(*)(*)(*)(*) seal of approval and thats a ok with troughers. The bigger the lie the more they worship it! holocaust denier? You mean people still believe in the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing holocaust? got a real noob here peeps!
Dont you think it would be wise to educate yourself first so I dont have to go behind you and correct you all the damn time? Yes you are trying to impress people out here since you have no math, none, zippo, nada and you never will.
Astrophysicists claim the universe is 13 billion years old. Is mathematics 1 million years old? One hundred thousand? Calculus and Newtonian Physics are not even 500 years old. Physics is how reality works. It does not matter if people understand it. But it consists of inanimate matter and forces. It is incapable of giving a damn about anything. Mathematics is merely a help in understanding it. The Sun did not orbit the Earth just because people thought it did and could not do the math. And I really don't give a damn what YOU regard as credible. All of the people who have decided to believe that airliners of less than 200 tons including 30 tons of fuel could destroy 400,000 ton buildings in less than two hours have already designated themselves as mentally defective. Can't even figure out what questions to ask to solve the problem. psik
You REALLY have an obscenely huge ego problem...Calculus is MUCH older than 500 years,Newton in fact used it... Mathematics is at least as old as humanity. And it's amazing the damage a bullet that weighs ounces,if even that,can do to a much larger human body,or even bigger animals 200 tons was plenty..
Every time you get called on your mistakes you bring out this bs. You're making a mistake. You're right that the physical world doesn't give a damn that you're making a mistake, but that does not somehow make your mistake correct. Your explanation for your observation is wrong. This explanation can be proven wrong but if you refuse to learn the concepts that prove you wrong you'll always be wrong. As you already admitted, momentum and inertia cannot slow the progress of the collapse to zero. You can run a momentum conservation all day long and you'll never mathematically show a point where the collapse stops. This is why you keep calling the math bull(*)(*)(*)(*). It's because the only math you know to describe the collapse doesn't work to describe the collapse. The process that you assert should have slowed the collapse to zero (the energy lost damaging the structure) is the process that you don't have any understanding of at all. This is what you need to learn about.
When did I say momentum and inertia were the only factors? You are the one who talks about buckling and complain about my saying "crush". But both require energy and the only source would be the kinetic energy of the falling mass. But then we don't have data on the amount of energy required to collapse each level of the core. It takes 0.118 joules for one of my single paper loops. It's not a "mistake" when you leave out information, is it? psik
I am supposed to be insulted by the obscenely ignorant? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_calculus ROFLMAO I knew that Newton was credited "by some" for inventing calculus when I was in grade school. On no, there goes that obscenely huge ego problem getting out of hand again. But there have been recent discoveries that Archimedes was approaching the invention of calculus before he was killed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes_Palimpsest But still the universe was running on physics before the dinosaurs were wiped out. Did gravity have anything to do with that meteor impact. psik
Eyes darlin' , the difference between us and 'them', as far as the controlled demo is concerned, is that we believe our own eyes as they do not dare to believe theirs. Let them stay stuck in their totally insane muddle of nonsensical equations, For ''Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.'' and indeed that are all that
<shakes head> Useless to post to someone so steeped in their ignorance that they can't admit being wrong..Calculus in one form or another has been around for thousands of years - - - Updated - - - There was NO 'controlled demo'...you're seeing what you wish to see.
http://www.math.tamu.edu/~dallen/history/archimed/archimed.html LOL alright. I just gave you an excuse to BS. Notice that says "anticipated" not invented. You can't find anything to support your claim because there aren't any. Problems that needed calculus to be solved existed before Newton and Leibniz and some Greek mathematicians recognized the issues involved but no one invented calculus to solve them. psik
Ummmm,a precursor to calculus is still ',like I said 'one form or another',didn't say a damn thing about him inventiing anything save his archimedes screw begone.
Yeah the even stupider ones came after 9/11 by morons claiming it was an inside job, the joooooos did it, or my favorite, it looks judt like a CD therefore it is!
