9/11 Truth for Dummies: Why Near-Free Fall Speed Was Impossible Without Explosives

He stated that they were able to successfully overcome those hurdles and he signed off on it.

 

The title can sound childish, but not so far from reality.

The Twin Towers were full of offices at high layers, this means a lot of flammable things which to catch fire needs just a little suggestion. And the impact of a plane with some good fuel inside is a very good suggestion.

Once in a office the fire starts, to stop it is not that easy and the fire, considering the initial temperatures of the involved environments probably run a lot.

There are videos showing burning pieces of furniture and other falling from holes in the external structure, on a side, before of the collapse of the first tower to fall.

A big plane, crashing, transforms kinetic energy also into heat, a part gives acceleration to the target structure, breaking it, [try this: use a hammer, hit with force a piece of metal and it will become hot .... kinetic energy becomes heat].

 

genericBob.

What unit of measurement is used to determine what load a floor is designed to uphold?

 

interagency rivalry has always been a problem,It's NOT 'edited'

And 'inept investigation' is YOUR opinion only

 

In other words, he was pressured to sign off. Yeah, I got that too. He even said as much.

 

It's a bit more than "interagency rivalry" but, you're certainly welcome to you own perceptions.

Yes, it WAS greatly inept. The purveyors of the sideshow admitted as much.

 

uh huh
sure they did

 

Non sequitur.

 

No, he was not 'pressured' to sign off.

Keep spinning, Boss. You gotta keep that post count up.

 

First of all, have you ever heard of Fahrenheit 451?
why is it called Fahrenheit 451?
Unless there was some means of force-feeding the fire with oxygen
the fires would never have gotten hot enough to even weaken the
structure of the towers.
Secondly, the heat would have to be focused, because unfocused
heat would not do the job, in order to achieve the destruction of the
tower(s) the energy of these fires would have to be focused on specific
parts of the structure to achieve the result.

 

Pssst...Big holes in the side of the building,wind force fed it.

 

and little elves in fireproof suits focused the energy?

 

Who says it has to be focused?

 

so you assert that totally unfocused energy could produce the observed result?

 

Like an uncontrolled fire in a chimney-like structure?

Yep.

 

Would an uncontrolled/unfocused fire in a chimney cause what was seen on 9/11?

 

Adding on the initial damage made by the aircraft: yep.

 

asymmetrical damage & unfocused fires producing complete & total destruction.
Ya, sure, U betcha ....

 

It was enough

 

Plus gravity.

 

wow man
Gravity works.

and indeed overcoming the 90+ stories
of skyscraper and all of the structural anomalies
that naturally occur in any work of human hands.

 

Indeed. Gravity wins.

 

is this to be considered characteristic of the
loyal opposition?

 

Insults, off topic

 

Given the non-uniformity of the damage that allegedly
kicked off this "collapse" why should gravity & gravity
alone guarantee a completely straight down "collapse"?