9/11: What really happened on that day? >>MOD WARNING<<

NORAD had at least 3 different "versions" of their "story". If I killed somebody and changed my alibi 3 different times, I'd be in jail. Shills like to defend this though, calling it "refining" the explanations of events.

 

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/NC21Dj05.html

 

Citations needed.

 

I was wrong. Sorry.

There were at least 4 versions.

http://digwithin.net/2013/01/12/eberhart/

 

Brilliant. I ask for a citation and you send me to Kevin Ryan's blog.

 

So it is your contention that NORAD didn't change their story?

 

[video=youtube;eRxJgbpdFMg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRxJgbpdFMg[/video]

 

Eberhart is not so good at CYA, is he?

From the Commission Report:

 

Is this the extent of your superior financial acumen, or do you have more to add on this subject?

 

Non responsive.

Now you have a "fresh" example as to why it is that engaging shills is rather pointless. Dodge, misdirect, ignore, ridicule. The shill.

 

Ryan is a charlatan and the blog is crawling with known charlatans.

 

Hilarious,coming from the master of 'unresponsive'

 

leftysergeant,

Why are you ignoring the question I asked you?

Here it is again: So it is your contention that NORAD didn't change their story?

 

My apologies for being away so long. I'm having some serious issues with a certain moderator over in the forum that I used to spend most of my time in and it's taken its toll on me. Anyway, once more into the fray...

I don't make that argument concerning the official story. I have frequently seen this argument being made against those who try to debunk theories that don't coincide with the official story, however.

I think that's a question that would probably be better asked in this thread, as it relates directly to the pentagon attack:
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...sident-truthers-american-77-hit-pentagon.html

While I may be suspicious of evidence, I don't discount it.

I take it that you don't believe that the official story is itself a conspiracy theory?

Tell me, have you ever read any of David Ray Griffin's books? I'm thinking of a certain passage from his book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" that strongly suggests that the official narrative does exactly what you are claiming alternatives to the official narrative do, and provides evidence that this is the case as well.

 

Based off leftysergeant's continued non-response to my question, it is as though I am asking him if he is cheating on his wife or something. Good gravy, quit being a coward and answer the question already.

 

Oh, I can find you more. You want to explain these transactions first, and how they are possible without prior knowledge to 9-11?

 

Can you source your quote, so it may be more fully examined?

 

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/NC21Dj05.html

 

Thanks. So (according to your source) the same guy who bought UA put options also bought over 100K in AA shares on the same day. How does that fit with foreknowledge, in your opinion?

 

It is not one person we are talking about here.

Explain how we have a 11 to 1 ratio of put to call options?

In what world of mathmatical probability does that exist?

Read the article. Have you ever heard of Prometheus software?

 

In the case of the UA, we are talking about one entity. Can you answer my question, please?

 

Wow!

I answered your question by explaining that we aren't talking about one person here. You then completely duck the fact that multiple trades have a mathmatically impossible ratio's. I have sourced these to you now. WTF are you talking about?

Talk about outing yourself!

 

In addition, AA stock had been trending down for weeks before 9/11, just like most of the NYSE. She the chart above.

 

The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.
No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.

 

In the case of the UA put options vs the AA share buy, we're talking about one entity. Explain how this instance points to foreknowledge.

- - - Updated - - -

Yelling won't change fact that you're incorrect, here. I pointed out one example already.