9/11 - WTC Building 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

It is Truther SOP - elitism by proxy. We mere mortals have proved unworthy of their explanations, then they wonder why the average truther meeting can fit in a phone box in the Bronx

 

Yes, there is a better explanation for how they did it.

 

Of course there isn't. If there was, you would have offered it by now.

 

A proper independent investigation with subpoena powers and ask the people who were involved. That has never been done. That would explain it. The truth about the events surrounding 9/11 would come out by an honest grand jury investigation.

 

So... you are just making stuff up?

 

Do you or don't you know how it was done or at least have your theory, is that really such a hard question to answer?

All i've asked is for you to explain in your own words what you think may have taken place.

you seem so sure it was an inside job or whatever but have yet show anything to prove it.

 

I do know who had the ability, the funding, and the expertise to do it. However, I do not have the evidence to implicate who I think did it. So I am not going to offer any theories. I favor an independent grand jury investigation with subpoena power to learn the truth rather than speculate.

 

You could have just stopped there...and you finally would have been correct.

 

You do know that, tons of thermite would have had to have been used, right?....if that was the case....why does Jones/Harriet only find (what they think is) trace evidence of thermite?

Why haven't they repeated their tests?

 

This is just an utterly retarded thing to say. Of course you can, proven by the fact that it was actually done. The possibilities for getting it inside are boundless when the head of WTC security is George Bush's criminal cousin, and only marginally less so in ordinary circumstances. Doing it at night is the obvious first choice, but unless someone watching knew what they were up to it could have easily been done in broad daylight. All they would have had to do is organise some form of bogus maintenance work, wear some kind of uniform and then just walk unimpeded throughout the building.

As a matter of fact, there were reports which hit the press shortly after 9/11 about a group of Israeli spies posing as art students being investigated by the FBI, who were given construction passes for the WTC buildings shortly before 9/11. Independent journalist Susan Lindauer also wrote a story claiming she had a state department source who confirmed via the WTC security feed that heavy equipment was smuggled inside the buildings in the weeks leading up to 9/11.

 

How much thermite do you think they needed to pull this off?

 

No, I don't know that. Please elaborate.

- - - Updated - - -

Do tell.

 

I don't know and I don't care. I only know what the evidence tells me happened. I'll leave the baseless speculation to you.

 

1,681lbs per column....is that realistic? Hell, the Mythbusters used 1000lbs of thermite to cut a car in half....and I dont think even that worked.

 

Interesting. Quite specific. Please elaborate.

 

Here is a link to the full article:

http://www.physics911.ca/thermite

It's very interesting....not to mention it would mean copious amounts of thermite....Tons...smuggled in and applied.

 

Not just unrealistic. Utterly retarded. This:-

hus to melt a 12 ft high Fe column, we need for an "average" column, (3.03 x 10+6 kJ)/(3.974 x 10+3 kJ/kg) = 0.7625 x 10+3 kg = 762.5 kg of thermite..

Made me laugh out loud. YouTube is loaded full of people using 1 kg of thermite or less, to completely cut through the equivalent amount of steel as was necessary for one column's destruction. Whoever wrote this post is such a cataclysmic idiot, that he does not understand the columns would have been cut horizontally, so measuring how much thermite was needed based upon their height is about as stupid as it is possible to be. Using chemistry terminology for iron in a physics equation involving the cutting of steel is also pretty dumb.

 

Perhaps you be less of a pompous (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*), and read the article. I know it sucks to be proved wrong but, you might learn not to claim things you know nothing about.

 

Giggle... giggle. You can do better than this. Provide proof of the official position.

 

Here is one and a half pounds of thermite literally blowing steel apart:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMsuXfQcduc

I explained that the equation you posted used the false variable of height in an equation where surface length/width needed to be used. Stop ignoring the things I say and admit you are talking absolute rubbish.

 

Got nothing, huh? So much for your Nutter Thermite/explosive claim.

 

You have been proven wrong. Here again is one and a half pounds of thermite blowing steel apart:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMsuXfQcduc

What is the point in arguing with us if you simply revert to name-calling every time you are proven wrong?

 

NO, we are discussing the use of explosives to bring down the WTC. Thermite is a no-go due to the amount that would have to be used..AND the fact there was no thermite found.

So what other explosive do you have?

 

25 grams of thermite burning through steel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFc84L4sDeA

 

You have already been proven to be lying about the amount needed. Here is the proof that you are lying that none was found:-

http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm

All you seem to have are lies, and since those have been proven as such you have simply resorted to name-calling.