9/11 - WTC Building 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

Discussion in '9/11' started by Brother Jonathan, Dec 5, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Jones/Harrit paper has been refuted as bad science. The so-called peer reviewers were people how consulted on the paper. The Millette paper refutes the finding of the Jones/Harrit paper. So, if the Jones/Harrit is correct...why don't they repeat their experiments?....share their samples????
     
  2. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Only somebody with zero personal experience with thermite, military grade demolitions (such as are used in controlled demolitions) or how controlled demolitions are actually performed would make such a completely clueless assertion. It is no accident that the relevant professional community that most unanimously rejects this theory are professional demolitions experts.

    And QH reveals in short order that he believes vacuous nonsense that has been so thoroughly debunked that any truly sentient being would be embarrassed to still believe it. In actuality, the head of WTC security was John McNeil, and he was killed on the job that day. The company for which Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker (the Bush cousin) worked ended its contract with the WTC in 1998... three years before the 9/11 attacks, and two years before George W. Bush would be elected President.

    An account which demonstrates a complete vacuum of knowledge about demolitions work. No amount of wandering around in uniform could distract from the requirements of such a job, and the impossibility of conducting it in the same places where people actually worked on a daily basis.,even for much smaller buildings. Walls must be torn out, load bearing columns exposed, large demolitions charges set with explosives, blasting caps, det cord and an entire electronic detonation system. The process for a job a fraction of the size of the WTC takes months of 10 hour work days.

    We'll ignore also that after all that work, such a detonations system could never have survived the impact of the airplanes.

    It is this simple reality that renders the theory of controlled demolitions of the WTC towers stupid out of the gate. For a reasonable person, this alone would end the idiotic continuance of the discussion.

    Ignoring that "smuggling heavy equipment" is an absurdity at its inception, if this was done "in the weeks leading up to 9/11" it would have been about six months too late.
     
  3. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    3000 people were killed that day. Anybody who can giggle as they discuss it is a despicable human being.
     
  4. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How big do you think that column is? Ten inches?

    The WTC core columns had outside dimensions of (the smallest) 36 inches by 16 inches, all the way up to 52 inches by 22 inches.

    You are suggesting trying to kill a pterodactyl with a flyswatter.

    Read the paper and learn something that is not merely an internet meme.
     
  5. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Aaaahhhh.... the Harrit paper in which paint chips were mistaken for nano-thermite of a type that has never actually existed. A paper which not only was never peer reviewed, but when it was published in violation of the journal's standards, the editor-in-chief resigned in disgust calling it not science but politics.

    Really?

    Are you really that many years behind?
     
  6. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which you claim was brought down by office fires. Over 3000 people were murdered that day not from office fires but from something else that looks like explosives.
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You left out the part about the planes.
     
  8. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No airplane hit building 7.
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Building 7 was hit by Building 1. Collateral damage.
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Stop being disingenuous,You know full well it was more than JUST 'office fires' than led to the destruction of the WTC towers..The towers quite literally had a good portion of their guts torn out by two hundred plus ton missiles filled with jet fuel flying at 443 and 542 MPH.

    The major structural damage,plus the fires coupled with gravity doomed the towers.
    NO explosives
    No incendiaries like thermite
    NO 'inside job'


    Nothing but the work of some zealots trying to buy their way into what they call heaven,with the blood of innocents.
     
  11. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is baloney. It is physically impossible. Stop with the nonsense.
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    WHY is it impossible?

    You REALLY think newton's laws work with that much damage?

    really?
     
  13. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Newton's laws are natural laws. They can not be violated. Something besides an airplane and office fires brought down those buildings.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Baloney. Or bologna, if you prefer. Nothing else was needed. The vast majority of experts agree.
     
  15. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    First of all you are several hundred years behind the curve as Newton made mistakes.

    Wikimedia Commons

    Sir Isaac Newton dropped a series of game-changing books about physics, math, science, and astronomy that have influenced scientific thought for generations, sort of like the Tupac of theoretical equations. His most famous and important work, the Principia, is a three-volume series of mathematical proofs about his laws of gravity and motion. People based calculus on the stuff Newton wrote in Principia, which is why it came as such a shock to the academic community when an undergrad at the University of Chicago discovered a big fat mistake in one of the equations that had somehow gone unnoticed by legions of scientists, mathematicians, and professors for 300 years.


    Diego Cervo/Photos.com

    Write out all the formulas you want, Newton was still wrong.

    Robert Garisto was working on a paper for a history of science class (because school subjects based entirely on the discussion of painful minutia are best when they are combined) when he noticed that Newton had mistakenly plugged the wrong number into an equation to find the mass of the Earth -- Newton had used 10.5 seconds in his write-up, but 11 in the actual problem.

    Garisto didn't think much of the error when he found it -- he assumed it had been put in there intentionally by his instructor, and that spotting it was part of the assignment. However, not only was the botched equation taken verbatim from Newton's book, but no other scholar in history had ever realized it was there. We're talking about 300 years of meticulous study and discussion, and not one person had ever noticed that Newton had put the wrong number into his own equation.



    Read more: http://www.cracked.com/article_2046...ed-shockingly-long-time_p2.html#ixzz2mmdOY6B0

    AboveAlpha...Oh yeah....the aircraft impacts along with the Jet Fuel caused the collapse.
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nothing was violated that day......Newtons laws didn't apply to what happened.

    the lower part of the towers could NOT have met the top part with an EQUAL and opposite reaction....all the energy was in the top part falling.
     
  17. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The vast majority of experts haven't looked into the issue. NIST lied in their report. FEMA admits to high temperatures in the destruction of building 7.
     
  18. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Newton's laws are not man made laws. They are only observance of natural laws. They can not be violated. Newton's laws apply to everything we do every day. They most certainly apply to 9/11.
     
  19. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay folks. 3000 people died on 9/11 and you people want to play silly games. Fine with me. I didn't know any of those people anyway. When they come for you don't blame me. I tried to tell you the truth.
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're misinterpreting the laws.....there was NO way the bottom floors could make an equal and opposite reaction with the top floors,Any more than a nail could with a hammer....
     
  21. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    And what exactly is your truth?

    Answer this question.

    Since the result of 9/11 was a extreme long term recession and almost Depression incurred by the United States and the World where all Large Corporate Entities experienced Multi-Billion Dollar Losses and Multi-Trillion Dollar Losses WORLD WIDE....why would any U.S. Governmental Entity that at the time was Republican Controlled and known to back Big Business desire to have 9/11 occur?

    Answer that.

    AboveAlpha
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Back on the cross?
    Don't blame us for your lack of evidence.
     
  23. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    LOL!!!

    That was funny!

    AboveAlpha
     
  24. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "when they come for you"???

    what do you mean

    who is "they"???

    why would they come for us??????

    what are they going to do to us?

    [MENTION=64100]Brother Jonathan[/MENTION]
     
  25. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And why didn't a Democrat controlled government in the guise of Obama toss them under the bus after being elected and discovering the truth.

    Or why didn't a budget conscious Bush simply pay 19 crazy people to fly the planes into the buildings and achieve the same result and exposure for a fraction of the price and effort.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page