9/11 WTC Demolitions, American Anger Lives On! The Criminals Exposed!

where do you think it came from?

troughers tell the truth once in a great while. LOL

 

Still misusing that word 'troughers' I see..


And it could have come from any scrap yard

 

Since its the same yard that nist used you now claim they lied then huh



What are you talking about

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trougher

 

Who says it's the same yard?..I'm talking about you misusing the word


duh.

 

nothing wrong with my usage of the word!

the only thing wrong is your claim its wrong.




I gave you the link above, do you need me to click on it read it to you and explain each word too?



[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="class: index"]1.[/TD]
[TD="class: word"] trougher[/TD]
[TD="class: tools"] 4 up, 2 down[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="class: text, colspan: 2"] A name to describe someone who eats lots of bad food all the time.
"you trougher"
Kelly is a stereo trougher at work

buy trougher mugs & shirts
troughing trough food eat junk
by lalafox Apr 16, 2006 share this add a video

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: index"] 2.[/TD]
[TD="class: word"] Trougher[/TD]
[TD="class: tools"] 2 thumbs up[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="class: text, colspan: 2"] a person who uses public coffers for personal, political, or monetary gain

The trougher most often denotes a pig who gorges themselves at the expense of citizen taxpayers, at the public "trough" usu by advertising or parroting misleading policy.
Troughers are alos people who support government policy blindly and without regard to accuracy or truthfulness.
Generally any person who gorges themselves like a pig feeding at a the trough.

buy trougher mugs & shirts

trough trougher shill shills pundants democrats republicans
by trougherinc Nov 17, 2012 share this add a video[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]



I dont see what is so hard to understand.

Then again they say a picture is worth a thousand words.



because there are pictures of them and fema crawling all over it.

 

In a shocking change to their normal techniques truthers have now moved on to personal attacks.

Thanks for showing why truthers still aren't taken seriously after over a decade of "bringing out the truth."

 

Point me to the dirty bastard that made a "personal" attack so I can report them!

 

9/11 truthers are fargin' sneeeeeeeeeeeeaky bastages!

 

now why didnt NIST say anythign about this again?

 

out of foucus pics from truthers about who knows what,from who knows where again?

 

He can't even explain what those pictures are showing, so he can't possibly know if it's been explained or not. He can't even define what part of it is "suspicious".

 

the fact that its not suspicious to you proves I would be wasting my time trying to explain it to you.

 

Hahaha wow, couldn't make it more obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about. This is all you've done the entire time. I've asked you to explain yourself and you've busted out every excuse in the book as to why you can't explain what we're looking at.

I have now concluded by your constant running, dodging, and ignoring perfectly relevant questions that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Insert your next childish comment. I would assume it will be something along the lines of, "You haven't shown me the NIST report."

 

yep you got it.

you seem to think that NIST addressed it, I say they did not.

Its your claim, I have no reason to go one step further until you put it on the chopping block pal!

 

Your sub par intelligence is amusing. So let's do this, I digress. It's not in the NIST report.

Now, please take the time to explain exactly what it is that we are looking at, and exactly how it shows that there were explosives, space rays, or whatever to bring down the tower.

Now you have no excuses, I agree. NIST didn't say anything about it, so I'll be awaiting your explanation.

 

ok pretend for a moment that y0u are the chief inspector and you are charged with telling us what you observe from this picture:






what general conclusions can be drawn from this?

and there are general conclusions that can be drawn from this IF YOU ARE AN EXPERT eh...



here maybe its easier to see here:





what in your expert opinion would make steel look like that chief inspector?













.

 

I didn't ask you to ask me a bunch of questions about still photos that you've found.

I asked you to explain exactly what it is we are looking at, and how it confirms that thermite\thermate\nanothermite\nanothermate, or anything else brought down the towers. That's it.

 

someone want to help him?

The chief inspector apparently does not understand what causes steel to look like that.

 

Jojo doesn't know anything about the pictures he posted. Hence the trolling and dodging.

 

yes this was seen at GZ

These are NIST FOIA RELEASES

I hope you at least know what a foia release is?


So did you ever see metal in more pristine condition?






and this





and this






and firestarter! that naughty lil gurl!




wow look at all that melted steel!




and the new improved steel!








I guess NIST felt this stuff was not important enough to mention in any documentation huh.

 

In one breath you say they are NIST FoIA releases, in the next you say NIST didn't mention them.
Perhaps if you cite your source, and provide links to them, you wouldn't be so confused. As it is, 'counselor' you are yapping at your own tail.

 

so you have no idea what the usual source for video clips is?

yeh I dont see anything real complicated about that.

what dont you understand?

 

I don't understand why you find it so complicated to present your evidence.

Everyone reading this knows it's because you have none, I just wonder why you haven't figured that out yet. Keep contradicting yourself, though. It's amusing.

 

oh contare

whats amusing is that deblunders are stepping all over their weenies over the undeniably painfully obvious.

for steel experts arguing the glubbermint position they arent doing too well!

On a scope of 0 to 10 they score a -22 LOL




this is the way it was delivered from walmart;




and this is the way it looks now;






and debunkers in their best efforts cant seem to find a difference.


They seem to need it explained to them?


What steel expert needs something so obvious "explained" to them?

Maybe my exptations are WAY TO HIGH but it seems to me that these steel experts who spend most of their time throwing pejoratives at people at least have some rudimentary explanation why the second one does not look approximately the same as the first one.

I am shocked that debunkers have no idea what that makes them look like!




I mean aside from the little white ones

 

Uh-huh. Eleven years later. Any evidence to back your trolling? No?

Funny Jojo, keep dancin'.