They are not superhuman and blending in an urban environment which has private security and trained law enforcement while trying to transport tons of explosives to accomoplish a task like this is not doable even for them. NIST said no such thing to refute the facts I have states
And while all the time avoiding how they got to the columns and floor bracing to create cutter charges.
You're underestimating them, again. And yes, you are in conflict with NIST with your incessant claim that "TONS of explosives" would be needed.
You're presupposing "them"...a nefarious goup of people inside the goverment who willing to kill their own US citizens. I doubt you could find enought "them" to participate.
Good. Now, show me where the US government plotted against, and carried out acts of violence to cause the death of US Citizens. Be specific.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/18/n...-assumes-mythic-qualities.html?pagewanted=all The B-Thing "artists" had no trouble doing what they wanted.
ya know, posting images when you can't support your claims...puts you in the same category as 7Forever. just sayin
Lol what? You said "willing to kill", I agreed and then you said "plotting to kill" I.e. moving the goal posts hence the .gif I posted. What's the disconnect here?
Saying they can walk on water or the surface of the sun or breathe in space without a spacesuit would be overestimating them. Circumventing WTC security is not. And once again, you are in conflict with NIST'S findings regardless if you admit it or not. Denialism is the path to trutherism, and you're on it.
Circumventing WTC security and the port authority for the weaks and months needed to prep the building and position / arm such an enormolus amount of explosives without something amiss being noticed by even the janitorial staff would in fact be beyond even their abilities. Once again nothing whatsoever in NIST conflicts or contradicts what I have stated I am not in denial you are being dishonest and you know it
Yeah, adding more fantastical ideas will make your claims more legitimate. It would not take WEEKS or months for demolition technology to be inserted nor tons of explosives to get the job done, the latter (pre nor) is supported by NIST, which you're still denying that you're in conflict with.
Those were not fantastical ideas they were facts and the reality of what it takes to demo a building. It is you stating a falsehood about what NIST states and that is fact. Yes it would take that much time and effort which is the norm for any such demolition.
Perhaps for average people, yes, but not men in special forces. And welcome to trutherdome Nazi. Your continued denial of NIST's findings have ushered you in the exclusive club. Hooray!
Yes men in special forces too. I am not denying the findings of NISt you are dreaming up findings they never gave.
Rather than getting lost in speculation about how it happened, can we get to a point of agreement about what happened?
we all know what happened. even the 9-11 Deniers know what happened, I am fully convinced of this. I think they're just playing silly games.
NO, there isn't any agreement on what happened, the towers were either intentionally destroyed by a well-planned demolition, or they "collapsed" because of the alleged airliner crash. There is a HUGE difference and that is very important.
no one of any true engineering or architectural significance disagrees with the official history of the event. sorry, but you lost.
Sorry but you cite an argument from authority and really the vast majority of Engineers and Architects have abstained from making any sort of statement about 9/11 because they don't want to become involved in a controversial subject. From strictly a probabilities POV, we can clearly see that it is totally improbable to have both towers destroyed in the manner that they were. How is it that an action that is only accomplished by careful planning & placement of explosives ... just happens in response to fires & damage alleged to be the product of an aircraft crash.
As soon as a significant number of AMERICANS get it, that is the fact that there is something VERY WRONG with the system as it stands. our "leaders" support the FRAUD that alleges hijacked airliners were used as weapons. Why are these clowns still on the public pay-roll?
Nope & nope. But just for clearity sake: you're saying that NIST didn't conclude that a singular failure of a beam (or whatever architectural term they use) caused global failure?
