911 Mr Demo says: Will the REAL COLLAPSE please stand up

yeh troughers arent real brite are they? None of them have addressed the OP yet

Which one are collapses and which are demos and which if any use explosives and which if any do not?

 

yes you can see the inward buckling in several areas.

Too bad theres no inferno to weaken the steel though huh! LMAO

How far into the demolition sequence is that again?

Now I never noticed that before. so thats where they lost the core, interesting.

Nice find.

However;

Now here is how you weaken steel





see and look how good that works!






now that what I call some nice buckling!


and another good way to do it is with orange jello! It has to be orange or orange and lemon mixed together make for yummy mouth buckling flavor.




you want to avoid making a mess though like these guys by letting it spill over the edge but you can see what a great job it does.

 

does that include the insurgency that took over the government converting to the gubafia?

Noone swears to defend the country that is purely tarded childish understanding of the law. They swear to protect the sovereignty which is a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing rag on a pole. to hell with the people and the country. you really need to pay closer attention.

right they dont give a (*)(*)(*)(*) and thats why they didnt bother investigating it.

 

I see koko is busy putting words in others mouths and denying what's plainly evident..

 

why dont you get together with your pals and address the OP

Which one are collapses and which are demos and which if any use explosives and which if any do not?

 

Why don't YOU quit making up stuff you have no way of proving?

YOU claim there was no 'inferno',based apparently on just what you could see on the surface

 

I thought monopolies were illegal.

what surface?

Oh invisible fire! Now thats novel! How does that work again?

I am enjoying watching all the troughers hide out and talk about EVERYTHING BUT THE CHALLENGE IN THE OP.

you're doing GREAT!

If this were a contest

 

And you're a lawyer? Yikes.

By the way, I responded to the OP in post #17. You must have missed it after posting your archive of animated GIfs that you've collected over the last 11 years.

 

I responded in post 25

 

No you didn't. You quoted my post and then asked me to respond for you. Do you need help understanding why 2 things traveling through different distances should take different times to do so if they are both travelling at the same speed?

 

Apparently you need help in understanding why they hit the ground at the same time under the conditins shown

and you further need help in understanding why your position is completely irrelevant to the point being made


and last you are ducking the OP challenge

Which one are collapses and which are demos and which if any use explosives and which if any do not?

your posts have nothing to do with the OP challenge.

 

I need help understanding why you think that. The WTC7 is a 47 story building of which your video only shows a portion, and then compares that portion to the collapse of different sized buildings. 1. What makes you think they all "hit the ground at the same time" when they clearly didn't. And 2. what makes you think they were travelling at the same speed since they were all different sizes?

 

those are your thoughts not mine, good luck with that red herring.

now lets get down to what I wanted to talk about and feel free to express your thoughts:

Which one are collapses and which are demos and which if any use explosives and which if any do not?

 

I have to give it to you, Fang. I am not sure how you can keep going against someone who makes a brick wall look like a genius. Brick walls aren't stupid enough to try and claim a fusion bomb the size of a golf ball went off in the towers. A brick wall won't try and pretend the government somehow had the ability to add CGI instantaniously to every camera including ones transmitting live. A brick wall won't try and pretend every person watching live that saw the plane is wrong. A brick won't try and pretend that for some reason two objects supposedly going the same speed for the same amount of time can travel a different amount of distance.

On a plus note, anyone reading the exchanges between yourself and Koko will instantly realize koko's claims are retarded to the point one wonders who could possibly be stupid enough to believe them.

 

If they are not your thoughts then you should not represent them as your thoughts by making statements such as:

Of course, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Obviously the only answer that remains is that they are not your thoughts because you didn't stop to think about what you posted at all. You posted the side by side GIFs in an attempt to claim that intentionally demolished buildings fell at the same rate of speed as the collapse of WTC7. What you didn't think about, clearly, is that the buildings you posted are obviously different sizes, which easily and completely invalidates your premise that they fell at the same rate.

 

......................................................

Red herrings dont buy much gas

 

Given you're claims are nothing but red herrings and bull(*)(*)(*)(*), I will bow to your acknowledgement that your red herrings don't buy much gas. If you could harness all that methane from the bull(*)(*)(*)(*) you could power a small city though. Just sayin.....

 

Really? Last time I checked freefall is freefall.

So tell us how many microseconds difference there is between them.


If ANY troughers out here had any real training they would be able to spot the differences in the pics posted in the OP botta bing botta bang, BUT NOT EVEN ONE OF THEM CAN HANDLE IT!

So much for REAL experience and their credibility.

I already told you insignificantly different speeds are irrelevant to the point.

No matter how you want to slice and dice it your zero relevance positions are still zero relevance.

Now I gave you the benefit of a doubt several times and you may as well admit you do not have the necessary experience to even guess whats going on in those buildings above.

 

this should help anyone with a handicap better understand others posts.

 

you just proved with your own reply that the CIA was behind 9/11.

Al-Queda was funded by the CIA and The Bush family was friends with the Bin Ladens ordering the government to let them be the ONLY ones to fly that day on 9/11 when nobody else could.

 

actually if you are like him and believe the conspiracy THEORY of the governments that 19 muslims pulled off 911, then your wrong,you are indeed a conspiracy theorist.lol

if you accept the truth that it was an inside job then you are a conspiracy REALIST.

 

A conspiracy realist is just a narcissistic nutjob.

 

Exactly. The acceleration of gravity is a constant. The building heights are variable. What does this say about the amount of TIME it should take for each building to hit the ground. Can they all hit the ground at the same TIME if gravity is constant and the height is variable?

See here's the key. If there's no difference in the amount of TIME they fell, then they must have traveled at different SPEED. And if this is the case, the purpose for your comparison vanishes.

 

Consider: WTC7 was 226 meters tall. That's an impact time of 6.8 seconds at free fall. WTC7 actually takes 13 seconds to collapse. This is slower than an object dropped from 820 meters, or 3.6 WTC7s stacked on top of each other. Your videos show buildings that are much shorter than 226 meters falling at the same rate as the WTC7 even though they have been scaled to appear the same size.

If you don't see the problem here then you fail at simple math.

 

so your point and claim then is that wtc 7 never goes into freefall. got it