911 Mr Demo says: Will the REAL COLLAPSE please stand up

it did collapse, however it was not a crush down, and the building did not disintegrate as a result of the collapse that was triggered by demolition.

A collapse follows every demolition, usual play on words, and gubbermint syntax terrorism to tell as little truth as possible and those who do not know the difference.


So you do not understand what a collapse is, if you did you would have stated it.

 

Partial collapse,and a collapse didn't follow THAT demolition and it didn't disinigrate because the remaining floors didn't go past their design load



And I understand what a collapse is,but I'm not going to guess what your definition is,I haven't got the time

 

HAHA.

See, that's the kind of sense of humorous I enjoy...sorry Koko. I don't like the personal name calling (*)(*)(*)(*)e.

 

if your vision is as bad as your logic I hope you dont drive.

anyone with 99% of their brain tied behind their back can see that in fact after the explosion the building did drop several feet.

That is a collapse. The collapse did not totally disintegrate the biulding however as intended.

So much for bazants crush down theory.

 

Maybe you should quit using your brains as back decoration and take into account the very real, very relevant fact that not every building is designed the same, made of the same material, or is the same size. Koko's entire claim is just as retarded as Psik's where he tries to pretend his toy "model" of the towers somehow proves that a collapse is not possible.

So much for koko's bull(*)(*)(*)(*) theory.

 

So it dropped several feet...And it's STILL a partial collapse,as the rest of the explosives apparently failed to sever key columns..

 

whew!

I am glad you took that into consideration!

So we await your detailed explanation on which types of buildings bazants theory in fact does work on if any.

 

partial collapse is still a COLLAPSE!

The correct answer to the challenge is approx 2.21 seconds.

the fact it did not disintegrate the whole thing is completely irrelevant and a red herring.

Same as what fang uses for wtc7

thanks for playing

 

now we can get a bit more complicated and graduate to high school level understandings of collapse.






what is/are the collapse time(s) in this case?

 

So this is what you're reduced to?semantics?

your whole line of reasoning here is bull****

 

According to Dykon's project list, this building is: Felling of 10-Story reinforced Concrete Building, Agentia, Newfoundland. (Sept. ’99) Philip Services, Jack or Scott Osmond, (902) 468-3331.

I suggest you call them if you want the answer. You can watch the video with sound here:

http://www.implosionworld.com/cinema.htm

Since you are all about comparison between this and the WTC. Can you tell me what's different when you watch this video with sound?

 

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Unlike troughers






I do not need to call ANYONE for the answer!


Like I said 7.7 seconds start to finish wtc 7

and of course not surprising troughers are stop watch challenged!

This is a comparison about different types of (cough) "collapses" (cough)(cough)

 

You still can't use 'troughers' right,can you koks?.....no surprise



Run away,run awayyyyyyyyyyy!

 

Unlike truthers, I don't make things up. I research the question, and get the answer from the source. That building is a 10 story reinforced concrete building. In what way is it analogous to a 47 story all steel design?

 

its really EXTREMELY simple. I challenged troughers to state the collapse time. How (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hard can that be? Even a child can push the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing button on a stop watch, but troughers, no they are all "worthless eaters" and need to ask someone who is smarter than they are to "GIVE" them the answers.

So you need me to give the the troughers the collapse times? Since you can do it yourself?

 

If only you challenged yourself to not be a such a complete and utter waste of bandwidth koko.

 

well kokomojojo since no one else out here (troughers) have the ability to CORRECTLY answer such a simplistic question I will answer it for them.


Average local collapse times range between 4.6and change and 5.2and change seconds.

Full global disintegration required 13 seconds and change.

 

You are correct!

 

So you used your stopwatch on a gif that isn't running in real speed and you think you got accurate results?

Okay ...

 

um yeh, it keeps it fair doesnt it, since that is what those who were challenged had to use, hence apples to apples CHALLENGE.

On the other hand for wtc 7 it was video.

Sorry about the pain troughers are suffering, but they should know better than to get involved with matters outside their working knowledge.

 

So you timed a gif and then responded to yourself.

I think you've hit the trifecta of stupidity koko. I'd say that was bandwidth well wasted.

 

So your working knowledge extends to clicking a stopwatch and finding animated gifs on the web?

Did you make your own diploma to go with that level of expertise?

 

too (*)(*)(*)(*)ing bad! troughers had well over a week to respond with correct answers and they proved they were not academically capable of formulating a method to accomplish that end.

Not my fault the correct answers are below the academic levels of most high school kids of the 50's.





Oh but dont lose any sleep over it since that was nly one small portion of the OP, feel free to use the graphics provided for reference and describe each situation from what can be observed. In other words dont cheat like fang did and most likely will do again.


.

 

It wasn't wasted - I haven't laughed so hard in weeks.

 

no amount or red herring off topic bull(*)(*)(*)(*) can help repair lost trougher credibility, as if they ever had any in the first place.

Thats ok continue to dodge the OP. Anyone who did not understand trougher tactics certainly do now.