911 World Trade Center Collapse, TRUTHERS WIN!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Aug 26, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Way to go truthers!

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA"]WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I) ...[/ame]

    How about it official story spinners! [​IMG]

    Truthers WIN!

    This shows a MASSIVE government coverup and by use of deception falsify official reports!

    NIST admits freefall and no building that is even remotely properly designed can freefall without demolition or demolition prepping.

    global failure meaning nearly the whole of the structural support fails at nearly the same instant causing a building to descent nearly straight down can be seen with the WYC 7 building and the only known way that can occur is by demolition.

    The whole building can be seen and has been measured by private parties and NIST to go into freefall for 2 seconds as can be seen here when compared to 3 demolitions;

    [​IMG]


    If a building goes into freefall for even one second during its descent that is SCIENTIFIC PROOF THERE THERE IS NO STRUCTURAL SUPPORT BELOW THE FALLING BUILDING.

    See NIST graph of ADMISSION below:


    [​IMG]



    PROOF - THE TRUTHERS were right ALL ALONG after all!


    Get the rope!


    .
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What have they won?

    The NIST report on WTC7 has been out for years, what has changed today?
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113

    recognition of the epic failure of any agency and or the back yard debunkers to claim anything different

    TRUTHERS WON!
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Truthers won" what, exactly?

    The report did not change its findings, it was simply expanded to be more user friendly to laypeople. Years ago.
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113

    admission of freefall
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'Truthers' won "admission of freefall".

    Ok, if you insist. Congrats.

    They 'won' this 'admission' several years ago. Are you just now getting around to celebrating?
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I am glad the debunkers finall come to their senses and admit wtc 7 was demolished and that the truthers won.
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    WTC7 was indeed demolished by uncontrolled, un-fought fires.

    Fire weakened the steel, gravity did the demolition.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113

    now that is scientifically impossible for a building to globally fail and freefall for even 1 second if fires brought it down.

    Please show your math and or sources


    TRUTHERS WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG!
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Prove that claim.

    Show your work.
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, you've convinced yourself and declared your victory.

    Now what?
     
  12. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Now....your team is on standby for ridicule and propaganda. Then, you'll shut down the thread if things get too "out of control".
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113

    NIST did it for me.

    Thats alright with you aint it?

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its undeniable!

    Truthers won!

    No plane hit this building!


    truthers shread the official fantasy



    [​IMG]
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]TRUTHERS RULE![​IMG]


    2 posts up NIST admits freefall! Global freefall (that means global *the whole building* failure *simultaneous or nearly simultaneous failure* of all structural supporting components) can ONLY be accomplished through demolition.

    i believe the evidence is incontrovertible when we compare the rate of descent of wtc7 against the rate of descent of 3 known acknowledged demolitions.

    How will they spin this one? I do not see how it can be done!

    See for yourselves!

    [​IMG]


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iikKzQwgBJc"]TRUTHERS WILL ROCK YOU!!![/ame]


    TRUTHERS ROCKIN THE BAD BOYS!
    [​IMG]
    Everyone loves a truther!



     
  16. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    koko, technically your side by side collapse videos are disingenious, if the different buildings have different heights, which appears to be the case.
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Trophy Points:
    113


    yeh that is a common mistake people make.

    the purpose of side by side is to show the sudden failure and rate of acceleration proving freefall. Even someone who knows nothing about math can see they match. Of course agenda driven people will pretend it has to be an "exact" match which is ridiculous but thats life LOL

    If they were substantially taller the taller one would only freefall for a longer time, or shorter time for shorter building.

    It is only meant to show the characteristics.

    Actually that is extreme, you do not even need that among non agenda people. When you deal with agenda people you need extreme examples. They need the 2x4 across the head before they get it usually.
     
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0



    If anyone DOESN'T see any red flags with WTC7, they are part of the problem (and largely ignorant and/or prepaid).
     

Share This Page