koko. Incapable of understanding physics. Incapable of even googling a simple event. Back on ignore you go.
you cant read, it said space debris not paint nothing said paint you are making (*)(*)(*)(*) up again sore loser LMAO
You are stuck with the fact that a slow-moving, propellor-driven aircraft penetrated the steel hull of the USS Hinsdale.
From your link - Space Debris Step 1. Press Ctrl+F Step 2. Type Challenger Step 3. Read the caption of the first instance hilighted. "A fleck of paint left this crater on the surface of Space Shuttle Challenger's front window on STS-7." Step 4. Make excuses for your total failure at using basic internet research skills.
You could pull close to 600mph in a 767 out of a dive. But koko still doesn't get it. f=ma e=1/2mv2 Go learn, discover why you are delusional, and make excuses, as predicted.
No. Max speed is about 265. You must be thinking of some other aircraft. It is, further, unlikely that the one that hit the Hinsdale pulled out of a dive to hit it at water line. - - - Updated - - - Nothing ON the planet. Lots of (*)(*)(*)(*) in orbit around it.
nothing on the planet is right. nope you should be looking at about 320 knots round about 380 mph, not that far off the claimed speed for 911
No. We have a lot of eye-witness accoints and video of far better resolution than you cheesey gifs. You need to prove that none did, not the other way around.
and none of them agree so its bull(*)(*)(*)(*). so lets see the evidence. not my fault all the videos are cheesy fakes and I am talking about the same clips you claim are high quality
The OP supposes nothing about whether or not 767 hit the WTC. Rather, it poses the question as to whether a 757 could penetrate steel. f=ma e=1/2mv2 Says yes, it can.
MASSIVE FAIL that also says it could penetrate a diamond the size of the earth and come out the other side of course your usual departure from the reality of the situation not withstanding
Actually, they do pretty much agree. It was big and grey and they could not see the windows or a logo one the front. At a thousand feet plus, a United aircraft of that time looks mostly grey and the windows are hard to see against the dark background and the horizontal stabilizers would at times have concealed the logo on the tail from various vantage points. You have another truckload of bugger all.
"aluminum wing v steel and the plane was not going at supersonic speeds" USS HINSDALE APA 120 - Kamikaze vs ship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hinsdale_APA-120_-_kamikaze.jpg USS STERRET DD 407 http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h98000/h98062.jpg Empire State Building - B25 vs building (masonry exterior) http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0311.shtml <<< Mod Edit: Personal Attack >>>
Masonry is far more resistant to aircraft than steel and a far lighter aircraft went right inside the ESB. You lose, Kokomojojo.
garbage they said it was gray, black, green, american airlines markings, no markings, blue markings, windows, no windows, big, small, military and you label that pretty much agree? give me a break, it could have been a volkswagon and you would say it pretty much agrees. sheees. - - - Updated - - - OMG Where did the wings go? They must have made a mistake because there are no wings, it must have really been a torpedo.
