911 WTC World Trade Towers, Did Thermate do This?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Sep 21, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So tell me why it can't....
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    do you know what you are looking at? Tell us what you "think" we are talking about here.
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You said it can't happen that way...now explain WHY it couldn't....time to back up your claims.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    airyoplanes can not destroy that building in the manner seen in those clips.
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Airplanes plus impact damage plus fire plus gravity can, and did.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    you cannot say that without being completely intellectually dishonest.

    All you know is that you saw a tv show.

    you saw fire, you saw a hole, you saw the building fall.

    You and others refuse to address the columns disintegrating to dust, just like you refuse to address the fake planes in all those fake videos and you refuse to address the fact that the sprinklers were working and that wtc2 did not have enough fire for a decent BBQ before they blew it up.

    You have no evidence beyond pure speculation and guess work.

    Now address those columns turning to dust.

    thermate does not do that. nor does an airyoplane, nor does jet fuel
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why not?.....
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    well if you think they can disintegrate steel into dust by all means share this miracle with us.
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The steel in WTC did not 'turn to dust'. This point has been addressed many, many times.
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't think that,YOU do.

    NONE of the steel was disintegrated
     
  11. obediant_consumer

    obediant_consumer Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAN5i21wBq4"]Thomas Kean aftershocks from planes caused collapse of WTC Building 7 wearechange - YouTube[/ame]
     
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    you are confused, it has not been addressed by anyone but me unless of course this is one of your semantic word conflation games?
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    more word play? more intellectual dishonesty. do you people ever tire of acting like 5 year olds?
     
  14. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
  15. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    what part of 'none of the steel was turned to dust' is wordplay with you?....seems someone here needs to get an intellect before they start throwing around the 'intellectual dishonesty' insult.
     
  16. obediant_consumer

    obediant_consumer Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    after 10 years of debate over wtc7 turns out the truther and the debunkers were both wrong.....it was the aftershocks of the planes hitting that made wtc7 come down with zero resistance...
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    for you to claim steel did not turn to dust or the equivalent thereof is intellectualy dishonest and worse a bold face lie as even a blind man can see it, not to mention it was stated on most of the network news and even platakey said the whole thing simply turned to dust.

    Is your position so weak that you have to lie?




    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]





     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't have to lie when I say steel does NOT turn to dust....not now, and not on 9/11.


    and NO ONE said the steel turned to dust,except silly troofers.

    Is your position so weak ,that you'd have to make up an impossibility?
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    yeh and dipsticks of the world thought it was impossible to fly too!

    How did that work out for ya?
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    the theory of flight is more scientifically sound that your magically disintegrating steel
     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113

    yeh those who were not scientifically inclined thought the phonograph was magic too.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Red herrings.
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hardly, point being you are incapable of discussing what you cannot even imagine much less have no knowledge of.
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not a question of what I can imagine....I can imagine quite a bit, it's a simple fact that steel will not instantly turn to dust, not now, not ever.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "instantly" is your word not mine.

    nice sleight of hand.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page