A basic question for 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists....

Where EXACTLY is conservative TV commentator Barbara Olson (or her body) right now?

 

What? Nothing?

 

One theory is that she is still alive.

9/11: Ted & Barbara Olson / Fake Victim Mysteries
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YarIJ_xfkts


I'd bet it was true. After all, the proof that 9/11 was an inside job is irrefutable.
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=412501&p=1065090514#post1065090514

She was probably in on it.
https://www.google.es/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=barbary olsen lady booth

 

What proof would that be? Up to this point you haven't once provided any. Curious.

 

That 'theory' has no basis in an fact.

 

Well, personally I do believe she's dead. I just question how and when she died. Not having the answers doesn't make the question a bad one especially when no one will release video of the Pentagon strike. I believe that's the plane she was supposedly on.

 

Why does there need to be a 'video of the strike'?

 

Because some of us are just skeptical of the powers that be especially when we've been lied to before in order to go to war. It's also hard to ignore the credible people who doubt that the plane could make those maneuvers while piloted by a novice. Doubly hard to ignore that there is no plane in the wreckage.

I could easily flip that question around and ask why you don't need to see the video. Isn't hiding all the footage and different camera angles a little suspicious?

 

what kind of a crazy question is that?

do you expect people to invent a few parlor theories outside the central issue that no passenger plane hit the deck? or do believe someone posting on this board actually has first hand knowledge?

 

Passenger planes did in fact strike there targets and a fourth crashed after all four were hijacked.

That is fact no twoofers has ever challenged.

Years have gone by and every twoofers claim has been crushed shredded and proven false.

You have no evidence

 

Thats the ongoing joke. Posers et al believe I need evidence. Well I dont. They need evidence.

From all the crash sites put together they have not been able to produce enough wreckage to amount to 1/2 of 1 plane. Its hard not to chuckle a bit that the public is that gullible.

 

They found the right amount of wreckage consistent with such crashes.

The crashes were all proven to have happened as were the hi jackinhs.

The burden is on you to provide evidence to the contrary

Your every effort to prove otherwise has failed

Only fools clings to twoofers fiction

 

Evidently you have no idea what happens during a plane crash. Not surprising for someone that has no experience to mistake their imagination as proof.

 

what I know is entirely irrelevant; unless you are about to prove planes vaporize and float into the air upon impact?

I know planes do not vaporize, small chunks yeh, vaporize and lose mass...NOT

 

Well, that is one of the most astute statements you have ever made.

 

great!

so we can expect to see 400 tons of plane debris from you.


.

 

Remember, what you know is entirely irrelevant, especially when you have no clue what you are talking about.

 

No one 'lied' to you to go to war

And I don't NEED a video..there is the wreckage of a 757 all around and inside the pentagon,PLUS the FDR and CVR were both found inside the pentagon,what I find suspicious,is why truthers such as yourself ignore that.

 

So you're saying lies have never been told in order to go to war? Gulf of Tonkin, the masterful performance of the Saudi ambassador's daughter before Desert Storm, etc.

If a plane really did crash there, there would be so much more physical evidence. Just look at any other plane crash in human history. Except of course the one in Shanksville because that one's even more ridiculous. Please explain why no video will ever be released of the Pentagon strike. If there's nothing to hide, why hide it? Shut us "nuts" up once and for all.

 

Oh stop it,you know very well what war you meant when you mentioned lying....And there was literally TONS of physical evidence at the site,you just refuse to see it


And there was at least two videos of the strike at the pentagon


Your argument from incredulity is therefore dismissed as ridiculous.

 

What war do you think I was referring to? That comment wasn't directed at just one war.

Please show me the evidence and videos that you claim to have. There is a difference between video and stills. We've seen dozens of angles of the planes hitting the towers from novice videographers. You're telling me we can't get the same, if not better, footage of probably the most recorded building in the world?

 

the only 'war' that's relevant when discussing 9/11


And I never claimed to have the videos,however the one from the parking lot cam,and the one from the gas station showing an explosion in the distance ARE available,if you look for them.

And what's this ridiculous claim of the pentagon being the 'most recorded building on earth?



according to whom?

Bogus argument from incredulity

 

That is a strange statement.

Everybody knows what happens when a plane crashes. We had a terrific video of that out in San Francisco last hear.

What's strange about 2 locations on 911 is that while we were told there was a crashed plane there, nobody could see it in the Pennsylvania field, and in the Pentagon, the only pictures released show it to be something other than a 757.

So.....

 

LOL, thanks for proving my point about no clue. A plane coming in for a landing at a much slower speed compared to something entirely different, a crash straight into the ground at 580mph.

 

Sigh...I guess you're unaware but there are many, many security cameras inside and outside the Pentagon. Not to mention the surrounding areas which were confiscated. But keep playing dumb. It really helps your argument.